Rob Woodall to Replace Scalise at Republican Study Committee

The Georgia Republican will serve as a caretaker until November.

The U.S. Captiol dome is seen before work begins on a two-year, $60 million rnovation of March 19, 2014 in Washington, DC.
National Journal
Tim Alberta
June 24, 2014, 3:14 p.m.

Rep. Steve Scal­ise will soon be re­placed as chair­man of the Re­pub­lic­an Study Com­mit­tee by Rep. Rob Woodall, who, upon his ex­pec­ted elec­tion next month, will serve as care­taker of the group for sev­er­al months un­til reg­u­larly-sched­uled elec­tions are held in Novem­ber.

The ap­point­ment of Woodall, a second-term Geor­gi­an who presently chairs the RSC’s Budget and Spend­ing Task Force, was pro­posed dur­ing Wed­nes­day’s meet­ing of the RSC. But some mem­bers, in­clud­ing Rep. Tom Mc­Clin­tock, ob­jec­ted on pro­ced­ur­al grounds and de­man­ded a vote be held to elect the in­ter­im chair­man.

That elec­tion will be held Ju­ly 9, after law­makers re­turn from next week’s re­cess. Woodall is uni­ver­sally ex­pec­ted to be chosen as the RSC’s short-term chair­man at that point.

“This was purely pro­ced­ur­al,” Mc­Clin­tock said after Wed­nes­day’s meet­ing. “I’m go­ing to be vot­ing for Rob Woodall.”

“It’s a tech­nic­al thing,” said Rep. Jim Jordan, one of the “founders” or former chair­men of the group. Be­cause the group’s bylaws state that an elec­tion must be held to choose a new lead­er — even on an in­ter­im basis — Jordan said mem­bers felt more com­fort­able vot­ing on Woodall’s ap­pint­ment.

Top RSC lead­ers — that is, Scal­ise and the former chair­man — form­ally asked Woodall on Tues­day to serve as a care­taker chair­man un­til the Novem­ber elec­tions. He ac­cep­ted with the un­der­stand­ing that he will not seek a full two-year term as chair­man in the up­com­ing Con­gress.

“Ab­so­lutely I will not,” Woodall con­firmed Wed­nes­day when asked wheth­er he’ll seek a full term as RSC chair­man.

Once Woodall is elec­ted Ju­ly 9, there will be a one-week trans­ition peri­od be­fore Scal­ise steps down on Ju­ly 16. With a scant num­ber of le­gis­lat­ive days between then and Novem­ber’s elec­tions, Woodall is not ex­pec­ted to ruffle any feath­ers at RSC.

Scal­ise, in tan­dem with RSC lead­er­ship, also in­tro­duced on Wed­nes­day a pro­pos­al that would fun­da­ment­ally al­ter the way the group’s lead­er is chosen.

The RSC, a caucus of more than 170 self-styled con­ser­vat­ive House Re­pub­lic­ans, has for nearly 20 years had its chair­man se­lec­ted by a small group of former chair­men known on Cap­it­ol Hill as “The Founders.” (When Scal­ise steps aside, there will be five mem­bers of this group: Scal­ise, Rep. Jim Jordan, Rep. Tom Price, Rep. Jeb Hensarling, and Rep. Sam John­son.)

On sev­er­al oc­ca­sions the founders’ pick of a chair­man has been chal­lenged by an­oth­er can­did­ate, who, after col­lect­ing sig­na­tures from 25 per­cent of the mem­ber­ship, can then force a group-wide run­off vote. This happened most re­cently in 2012, when the founders en­dorsed Rep. Tom Graves of Geor­gia — only to see him lose to Scal­ise, the cur­rent RSC chair­man, in a hotly-con­tested elec­tion.

Seek­ing to avoid such in­terne­cine clashes in the fu­ture — which put the founders in the un­en­vi­able po­s­i­tion of pub­licly re­ject­ing a can­did­ate who may soon join their ex­clus­ive club — RSC lead­ers are sug­gest­ing a new meth­od for choos­ing a chair­man. Un­der the pro­posed rule tweak, the founders would in­ter­view any mem­ber in­ter­ested in the chair­man­ship, and then en­dorse mul­tiple can­did­ates to ad­vance to an elec­tion. This would al­low the RSC to func­tion more demo­crat­ic­ally, while still pre­serving the founders’ role of weed­ing out ill-suited can­did­ates.

“It would open things up, but the founders would still play a ma­jor role in the se­lec­tion pro­cess,” said one RSC steer­ing com­mit­tee mem­ber, who was not au­thor­ized to speak pub­licly about the rule change.

The pro­posed rule change must be rat­i­fied by the RSC mem­ber­ship. A vote will likely be held on Ju­ly 9, the same day mem­bers choose an in­ter­im chair­man.

Now that Woodall has been tapped to serve as a care­taker — with as­sur­ances that he will not seek a full term, and there­fore does not en­joy a head start on that com­pet­i­tion — the can­did­ates to be­come RSC chair­man in the next pro­gress will con­tin­ue cam­paign­ing for the reg­u­larly-sched­uled Novem­ber elec­tion.

Rep. Mick Mul­vaney of South Car­o­lina, who is enorm­ously pop­u­lar among young­er mem­bers in the group and has strong per­son­al re­la­tion­ships with the founders, is the early front-run­ner to take over in the 114th Con­gress. But sev­er­al oth­er law­makers are ex­pec­ted to com­pete with Mul­vaney for the RSC gavel. Rep. Louie Gohmert of Texas has already de­clared his can­did­acy, and Rep. Andy Har­ris of Mary­land is said to be ser­i­ously con­sid­er­ing a run.

Rep. Marlin Stutz­man of In­di­ana, who lost last week’s spe­cial elec­tion for ma­jor­ity whip, has not ruled out an RSC cam­paign. However, an­oth­er loser from last week’s elec­tions — Rep. Raul Lab­rador of Idaho — said defin­it­ively last Fri­day that he would not run for RSC chair­man.

This story was up­dated Wed­nes­day af­ter­noon after the RSC meet­ing.

What We're Following See More »
How Many Jobs Would Be Lost Under Bernie Sanders’s Single-Payer System?
6 hours ago

More than 11 million, according to Manhattan Institute fellow Yevgeniy Feyman, writing in RealClearPolicy.

State to Release 550 More Clinton Emails on Saturday
6 hours ago

Under pressure from a judge, the State Department will release about 550 of Hillary Clinton’s emails—“roughly 14 percent of the 3,700 remaining Clinton emails—on Saturday, in the middle of the Presidents Day holiday weekend.” All of the emails were supposed to have been released last month. Related: State subpoenaed the Clinton Foundation last year, which brings the total number of current Clinton investigations to four, says the Daily Caller.

Jim Webb Rules Out Independent Bid
7 hours ago

UPDATED: Sen. Jim Webb (D-VA) will not be playing the role of Ralph Nader in this year’s election. Speaking in Dallas today, Webb said, “We looked at the possibility of an independent candidacy. Theoretically, it could be done, but it is enormously costly and time sensitive, and I don’t see the fundraising trajectory where we could make a realistic run.”

RNC Chief Would Welcome Bloomberg
7 hours ago

“The lead­ers of the Re­pub­lic­an and Demo­crat­ic na­tion­al com­mit­tees on Wed­nes­day weighed in on the pro­spect of an in­de­pend­ent pres­id­en­tial run by” former New York City May­or Mi­chael Bloomberg (I). “DNC Chair­wo­man Debbie Wasser­man Schultz sug­ges­ted that the former New York City may­or’s pri­or­it­ies are already ‘well cared-for’ in the Demo­crat­ic plat­form, while RNC lead­er Re­ince Priebus wel­comed the idea, say­ing Bloomberg would si­phon off votes from the Demo­crat­ic can­did­ate.”

How Large Is Hillary Clinton’s Delegate Lead?
8 hours ago

Three hundred fifty-two, thanks to superdelegates pledged to Clinton, and the vagaries of the delegate allocation process in early states. Not bad, considering her results have been a virtual tie and a blowout loss.