Changing of the Guard in House Leadership Does Little for Unemployment Insurance Prospects

Senate Republican supporters are wary of signing onto another bill that’s going nowhere.

WASHINGTON, DC - APRIL 03: Senators Dean Heller (R-NV), left, and Jack Reed (D-RI) speak to the press after a 61-35 vote in the Senate to advance the previous Reed-Heller unemployment insurance bill on April 3, 2014.
National Journal
Sarah Mimms
See more stories about...
Sarah Mimms
June 24, 2014, 8:13 a.m.

Sens. Jack Reed and Dean Heller in­tro­duced an un­em­ploy­ment-in­sur­ance bill on Tues­day morn­ing, of­fer­ing new le­gis­la­tion that looks very much like the bill they passed in April that failed to gain any in­terest from House Re­pub­lic­an lead­er­ship be­fore it ex­pired in May.

“What I was hop­ing would be a sprint has be­come a mara­thon,” Heller joked Tues­day.

The new bi­par­tis­an bill would re­store un­em­ploy­ment-in­sur­ance be­ne­fits for five months but would not be not ret­ro­act­ive to last Decem­ber. It is, however, pro­tec­ted by the same off­sets as the pre­vi­ous Sen­ate bill — which were called “gim­micks” by many House Re­pub­lic­ans and a num­ber of their coun­ter­parts in the Sen­ate — and does not in­clude a sep­ar­ate jobs pro­vi­sion, something House Speak­er John Boehner has said would be ne­ces­sary for his cham­ber to con­sider it.

The Sen­ate’s new bill would cost a little less than $10 bil­lion and cov­er five months of be­ne­fits. Un­like the pre­vi­ous Sen­ate bill that ex­pired on May 31, the new five-month count­down won’t be­gin un­til after the pres­id­ent signs the le­gis­la­tion, pre­vent­ing sen­at­ors from hav­ing to start over again like they did last time.

Giv­en the lack of sub­stan­tial changes to the bill, even staunch sup­port­ers say pas­sage ap­pears un­likely. “I think it’s go­ing to be very tough,” Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, said.

But Heller and Reed, whose home states of Nevada and Rhode Is­land have the highest un­em­ploy­ment rates in the coun­try, re­main pos­it­ive. “I think this can get done,” Heller said at a press con­fer­ence Tues­day. “It’s go­ing to take more sides work­ing to­geth­er, try­ing to solve this prob­lem.”

Heller began this week with a po­ten­tial ace in his pock­et: a close ally who re­cently rose up in the ranks of House lead­er­ship.

At first, the elec­tion of Kev­in Mc­Carthy of Cali­for­nia to House ma­jor­ity lead­er Thursday looked like a good sign for un­em­ploy­ment in­sur­ance ad­voc­ates. Heller and Mc­Carthy were both mem­bers of the class of 2006 in the House and hail from neigh­bor­ing states. When mur­murs of Eric Can­tor’s resig­na­tion began two weeks ago, Heller crossed the Cap­it­ol to drop by Mc­Carthy’s of­fice and of­fer his sup­port. The two didn’t dis­cuss un­em­ploy­ment in­sur­ance in that meet­ing, but the close re­la­tion­ship between Heller and Mc­Carthy offered a ray of hope that, at the very least, Heller’s in­terest in the is­sue would be heard.

Heller has since called the new ma­jor­ity lead­er and re­ceived some dis­ap­point­ing news: Mc­Carthy and Boehner are on the same page. “His mes­sage was very clear. It was very sim­il­ar to Boehner’s — very sim­il­ar to Boehner’s — and that is, ‘We want job pro­vi­sions,’ ” Heller said, adding that their con­ver­sa­tions will con­tin­ue. Boehner has called re­peatedly on Pres­id­ent Obama to make a deal with the House, of­fer­ing re­forms to en­ergy, taxes, or the health care law, Heller sug­ges­ted, in re­turn for an ex­ten­sion of un­em­ploy­ment-in­sur­ance be­ne­fits.

Heller is still hope­ful, and has said re­peatedly in re­cent weeks that he’s sym­path­et­ic to the House mem­bers’ con­cerns. The cham­ber has about 40 jobs bills lan­guish­ing in the Sen­ate and would like to see one or more brought to the floor in ex­change for a vote on un­em­ploy­ment in­sur­ance.

Heller said he has spoken with Obama about the is­sue, and was grate­ful for his sup­port, but he called on the pres­id­ent to take a more act­ive role on the is­sue. “I know this is­sue is im­port­ant to the pres­id­ent,” he said “He needs to be more en­gaged. He needs to pick up the phone and talk to the speak­er and say, ‘Hey, how can we get this done?’ ” Heller said.

But Reed, a Demo­crat, said that the Sen­ate has already jumped through a num­ber of hoops for House Re­pub­lic­ans — pay­ing for both Sen­ate bills and re­mov­ing ret­ro­act­ive be­ne­fits, which the House ar­gued would be dif­fi­cult to ad­min­is­ter, in the new le­gis­la­tion — and he called ad­di­tion­al con­cerns from the House “not reas­ons [to not pass the Sen­ate bills], but ex­cuses.”More than 3 mil­lion Amer­ic­ans have lost their un­em­ploy­ment-in­sur­ance be­ne­fits since the pro­gram ex­pired last year, he noted. “I don’t think we can leave these fam­il­ies be­hind,” he said.

And with sum­mer com­ing and un­rest in the Middle East, Heller ad­ded, this le­gis­la­tion is more im­port­ant than even. Heller said he is grow­ing con­cerned about gas prices go­ing up dur­ing travel sea­son and put­ting even more fam­il­ies in a fin­an­cial bind.

For now, the lack of move­ment in the House has even some Sen­ate ad­voc­ates for re­form balk­ing at the idea of an­oth­er vote that’s head­ing nowhere. “You know, how many times do we have to go through this ex­er­cise without the House ac­tu­ally show­ing some in­terest or mak­ing some move­ment so that we can all jump on board,” Heller said of Re­pub­lic­an sup­port­ers. “They don’t want to go through this ex­er­cise over and over again. And they’ll end up cast­ing the ap­pro­pri­ate votes, but they want this le­gis­la­tion [to be­come law].”

Al­though the new le­gis­la­tion does not in­clude ret­ro­act­ive be­ne­fits for those who stopped re­ceiv­ing checks after un­em­ploy­ment in­sur­ance ex­pired in Decem­ber, it will al­low those who had not yet com­pleted the pro­gram to re­sume re­ceiv­ing be­ne­fits for however many weeks they had left when the pro­gram ex­pired.

What We're Following See More »
AT LEAST NOT YET
Paul Ryan Can’t Get Behind Trump
14 hours ago
THE LATEST

Paul Ryan told CNN today he's "not ready" to back Donald Trump at this time. "I'm not there right now," he said. Ryan said Trump needs to unify "all wings of the Republican Party and the conservative movement" and then run a campaign that will allow Americans to "have something that they're proud to support and proud to be a part of. And we've got a ways to go from here to there."

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trump Roadmapped His Candidacy in 2000
16 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The Daily Beast has unearthed a piece that Donald Trump wrote for Gear magazine in 2000, which anticipates his 2016 sales pitch quite well. "Perhaps it's time for a dealmaker who can get the leaders of Congress to the table, forge consensus, and strike compromise," he writes. Oddly, he opens by defending his reputation as a womanizer: "The hypocrites argue that a man who loves and appreciates beautiful women (and does so legally and openly) shouldn't become a national leader? Is there something wrong with appreciating beautiful women? Don't we want people in public office who show signs of life?"

Source:
‘NO MORAL OR ETHICAL GROUNDING’
Sen. Murphy: Trump Shouldn’t Get Classified Briefigs
16 hours ago
THE LATEST
JOINS BUSHES, MCCAIN
Romney to Skip Convention
17 hours ago
THE LATEST

An aide to Mitt Romney confirmed to the Washington Post that the 2102 GOP nominee will not attend the Republican convention this year. He joins the two living Republican presidents, George W. Bush and George H.W. Bush, as well as 2008 nominee John McCain in skipping the event. Even among living Republican nominees, that leaves only Bob Dole who could conceivably show up. Dole did say in January that he'd prefer Trump to Ted Cruz, but his age (92) could keep him from attending.

Source:
#NEVERTRUMP
Sen. Sasse Calls for a Third Candidate
20 hours ago
THE LATEST

Sen. Ben Sasse, the most prominent elected official to declare that he's #NeverTrump, wrote an open letter on Facebook to the "majority of Americans who wonder why the nation that put a man on the moon can’t find a healthy leader who can take us forward together." Calling to mind recent conversations at a Fremont, Neb., Walmart, the senator pitted the presumptive general election battle between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton as such a "terrible choice" that there would be an appetite for another candidate to emerge. In a parenthetical aside to reporters, Sasse ruled himself out. "Such a leader should be able to campaign 24/7 for the next six months," he wrote. "Therefore he/she likely can’t be an engaged parent with little kids." Meanwhile, his colleague Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) admitted in a private recording obtained by Politico that Trump hurts his reelection chances.

Source:
×