New, Five-Month Unemployment Insurance Bill Will Likely Hit the Senate Next Week

Sens. Heller and Reed get ready to try again. But in the House, nothing’s changed.

Senators Jack Reed (D-RI) and Dean Heller (R-NV) stand in front of a screen showing an increasing number count to represent the number of Americans losing their unemployment insurance, on April 3, 2014 in Washington, DC.
National Journal
Sarah Mimms
June 20, 2014, 1:15 a.m.

Sen­ate ne­go­ti­at­ors are once again go­ing to bat for un­em­ploy­ment in­sur­ance. Sen. Dean Heller of Nevada — a Re­pub­lic­an who has been work­ing closely with Demo­crat­ic Sen. Jack Reed of Rhode Is­land for more than a month to con­struct new le­gis­la­tion — said the an­nounce­ment will likely come next week.

The bill will re­store un­em­ploy­ment-in­sur­ance be­ne­fits for five months and will not in­clude ret­ro­act­ive checks for the un­em­ployed who stopped re­ceiv­ing be­ne­fits in Decem­ber, ac­cord­ing to a Sen­ate aide. Oth­er de­tails on the bill are sparse, and Heller in­dic­ated this week that some of them — in­clud­ing how the bill will be paid for — are still be­ing worked out.

More than 3 mil­lion Amer­ic­ans have stopped re­ceiv­ing emer­gency un­em­ploy­ment-in­sur­ance be­ne­fits since the pro­gram ex­pired on Dec. 28. The new le­gis­la­tion will not re­im­burse those people, ac­cord­ing to the aide, but would provide checks to those who re­main un­em­ployed and qual­i­fy for the pro­gram for five months after the bill passes.

That is, if it passes.

Back in Decem­ber, Demo­crats in the House pushed to keep the be­ne­fits go­ing, but were blocked by House Re­pub­lic­ans.

That will al­most cer­tainly hap­pen again with the Sen­ate bill, un­less something changes drastic­ally. House Speak­er John Boehner has said re­peatedly that he will not bring up a bill to ex­tend un­em­ploy­ment in­sur­ance un­less it is paid for and in­cludes a sep­ar­ate jobs pro­vi­sion. That likely hasn’t changed. The Sen­ate in April presen­ted him with the former, but not the lat­ter, and Boehner al­lowed the bill to idle un­til it ex­pired at the end of May.

Heller told Na­tion­al Journ­al two weeks ago that he agreed with Boehner’s po­s­i­tion, but was un­able to get a jobs pack­age in­to the bill. It is un­clear if that has changed in the in­ter­im.

In the Sen­ate, Heller and Reed will need to gath­er five more Re­pub­lic­an votes to pass the bill. Al­though the two con­duc­ted their ne­go­ti­ations one-on-one (and with their staffs), they have be­gun reach­ing out to some of the mem­bers who joined them in passing the bill in April to sign onto the new le­gis­la­tion. They are Re­pub­lic­an Sens. Kelly Ayotte of New Hamp­shire, Susan Collins of Maine, Mark Kirk of Illinois, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, and Rob Port­man of Ohio.

The tim­ing on when the bill will come to the Sen­ate floor is de­pend­ent on the on­go­ing battle over ap­pro­pri­ations. Sen­ate Ap­pro­pri­ations Com­mit­tee Chair­wo­man Bar­bara Mikul­ski of Mary­land is sup­posed to have the floor for the next three weeks to pass the na­tion’s spend­ing bills through the cham­ber, but a fight over amend­ments could de­rail that, put­ting un­em­ploy­ment in­sur­ance on the floor as soon as next week.

What We're Following See More »
CNN/ORC
Clinton Ahead by 13 in Early Going
15 minutes ago
THE LATEST

"As Donald Trump captures the mantle of presumptive Republican nominee, a new poll finds he begins his general election campaign well behind Democratic front-runner Hillary Clinton. The new CNN/ORC Poll, completed ahead of Trump's victory last night, found Clinton leads 54% to 41%, a 13-point edge over the New York businessman, her largest lead since last July. Clinton is also more trusted than Trump on many issues voters rank as critically important, with one big exception. By a 50% to 45% margin, voters say Trump would do a better job handling the economy than Clinton would."

Source:
ACCEPT OR RESIST?
Wall Street Journal, Kristol Reflect Schism on the Right
23 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

In an editorial, the Wall Street Journal sets out to relieve conservatives of the temptation to back a third-party candidate over Donald Trump. "The thought is more tempting this year than most, but it’s still hard to see how this would accomplish more than electing Hillary Clinton and muddling the message from a Trump defeat. ... The usual presidential result is that the party that splinters hands the election to the other, more united party." But in the Weekly Standard, Bill Kristol is having none of it: "Serious people, including serious conservatives, cannot acquiesce in Donald Trump as their candidate. ... Donald Trump should not be president of the United States. The Wall Street Journal cannot bring itself to say that. We can say it, we do say it, and we are proud to act accordingly."

NOT WELL FOR THE GOP
The Trump Triumph: How’s It Playing?
1 hours ago
WHY WE CARE
  • Nate Cohn, New York Times: "There have been 10-point shifts over the general election season before, even if it’s uncommon. But there isn’t much of a precedent for huge swings in races with candidates as well known as Mr. Trump and Mrs. Clinton. A majority of Americans may not like her, but they say they’re scared of him."
  • Roger Simon, PJ Media: "He is particularly fortunate that his opposition, Hillary Clinton, besides still being under threat of indictment and still not having defeated Bernie Sanders (go figure), is a truly uninspiring, almost soporific, figure. ... She's not a star. Trump is. All attention will be on him in the general election. The primaries have shown us what an advantage that is. What that means for American politics may not all be good, but it's true."
  • The editors, The Washington Examiner: "At the very least, Trump owes it to the country he boasts he will 'make great again' to try to demonstrate some seriousness about the office he seeks. He owes this even to those who will never consider voting for him. He can start by swearing off grand displays of aggressive and apparently deliberate ignorance. This is not too much to ask."
FOLLOWS UNITEDHEALTH
Humana Will Also Exit Obamacare Exchanges
1 hours ago
THE LATEST

Humana announced it plans to "exit certain statewide individual markets and products 'both on and off [Obamacare] exchange,' the insurer said in its financial results released Monday." The company also said price hikes may be forthcoming, "commensurate with anticipated levels of risk by state." Its individual-market enrollment was down 21% in the first quarter from a year ago.

Source:
‘PRESUMPTIVE NOMINEE’
Priebus Asks Party to Unite Behind Trump
13 hours ago
THE LATEST
×