Senate negotiators are once again going to bat for unemployment insurance. Sen. Dean Heller of Nevada — a Republican who has been working closely with Democratic Sen. Jack Reed of Rhode Island for more than a month to construct new legislation — said the announcement will likely come next week.
The bill will restore unemployment-insurance benefits for five months and will not include retroactive checks for the unemployed who stopped receiving benefits in December, according to a Senate aide. Other details on the bill are sparse, and Heller indicated this week that some of them — including how the bill will be paid for — are still being worked out.
More than 3 million Americans have stopped receiving emergency unemployment-insurance benefits since the program expired on Dec. 28. The new legislation will not reimburse those people, according to the aide, but would provide checks to those who remain unemployed and qualify for the program for five months after the bill passes.
That is, if it passes.
Back in December, Democrats in the House pushed to keep the benefits going, but were blocked by House Republicans.
That will almost certainly happen again with the Senate bill, unless something changes drastically. House Speaker John Boehner has said repeatedly that he will not bring up a bill to extend unemployment insurance unless it is paid for and includes a separate jobs provision. That likely hasn’t changed. The Senate in April presented him with the former, but not the latter, and Boehner allowed the bill to idle until it expired at the end of May.
Heller told National Journal two weeks ago that he agreed with Boehner’s position, but was unable to get a jobs package into the bill. It is unclear if that has changed in the interim.
In the Senate, Heller and Reed will need to gather five more Republican votes to pass the bill. Although the two conducted their negotiations one-on-one (and with their staffs), they have begun reaching out to some of the members who joined them in passing the bill in April to sign onto the new legislation. They are Republican Sens. Kelly Ayotte of New Hampshire, Susan Collins of Maine, Mark Kirk of Illinois, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, and Rob Portman of Ohio.
The timing on when the bill will come to the Senate floor is dependent on the ongoing battle over appropriations. Senate Appropriations Committee Chairwoman Barbara Mikulski of Maryland is supposed to have the floor for the next three weeks to pass the nation’s spending bills through the chamber, but a fight over amendments could derail that, putting unemployment insurance on the floor as soon as next week.
What We're Following See More »
"As Donald Trump captures the mantle of presumptive Republican nominee, a new poll finds he begins his general election campaign well behind Democratic front-runner Hillary Clinton. The new CNN/ORC Poll, completed ahead of Trump's victory last night, found Clinton leads 54% to 41%, a 13-point edge over the New York businessman, her largest lead since last July. Clinton is also more trusted than Trump on many issues voters rank as critically important, with one big exception. By a 50% to 45% margin, voters say Trump would do a better job handling the economy than Clinton would."
In an editorial, the Wall Street Journal sets out to relieve conservatives of the temptation to back a third-party candidate over Donald Trump. "The thought is more tempting this year than most, but it’s still hard to see how this would accomplish more than electing Hillary Clinton and muddling the message from a Trump defeat. ... The usual presidential result is that the party that splinters hands the election to the other, more united party." But in the Weekly Standard, Bill Kristol is having none of it: "Serious people, including serious conservatives, cannot acquiesce in Donald Trump as their candidate. ... Donald Trump should not be president of the United States. The Wall Street Journal cannot bring itself to say that. We can say it, we do say it, and we are proud to act accordingly."
- Nate Cohn, New York Times: "There have been 10-point shifts over the general election season before, even if it’s uncommon. But there isn’t much of a precedent for huge swings in races with candidates as well known as Mr. Trump and Mrs. Clinton. A majority of Americans may not like her, but they say they’re scared of him."
- Roger Simon, PJ Media: "He is particularly fortunate that his opposition, Hillary Clinton, besides still being under threat of indictment and still not having defeated Bernie Sanders (go figure), is a truly uninspiring, almost soporific, figure. ... She's not a star. Trump is. All attention will be on him in the general election. The primaries have shown us what an advantage that is. What that means for American politics may not all be good, but it's true."
- The editors, The Washington Examiner: "At the very least, Trump owes it to the country he boasts he will 'make great again' to try to demonstrate some seriousness about the office he seeks. He owes this even to those who will never consider voting for him. He can start by swearing off grand displays of aggressive and apparently deliberate ignorance. This is not too much to ask."
Humana announced it plans to "exit certain statewide individual markets and products 'both on and off [Obamacare] exchange,' the insurer said in its financial results released Monday." The company also said price hikes may be forthcoming, "commensurate with anticipated levels of risk by state." Its individual-market enrollment was down 21% in the first quarter from a year ago.