Rep. Don Young has been issued a formal letter of reproval — a public rebuke — from the House Ethics Committee for misconduct tied to his acceptance of impermissible gifts and trips and his misuse of campaign funds, the panel announced Friday.
The action represents the least severe of a range of punishments that the committee could have taken against Young — including a formal reprimand or censure from the full House of Representatives, or even expulsion from the House.
“I accept the House Committee on Ethics’ report and regret the oversights it has identified,” Young said in a statement Friday. “There were a number of instances where I failed to exercise due care in complying with the House’s Code of Conduct and for that I apologize. As the Committee indicates in its report, I never ‘made any knowingly false statements to government officials’ nor did I act ‘corruptly or in bad faith.”
The committee’s found that between 2001 and 2013, Young improperly used campaign funds and accepted donor gifts tied to 15 hunting trips and other activities — a total value of about $59,063.
Young was also found to not have reported certain gifts on his annual financial-disclosure statements. Young, 81, is now the longest-serving Republican in the House (he first came to the chamber in 1973).
An accompanying report on the matter released Friday by the committee says Young has already expressed regret and accepted responsibility.
In addition, the report says Young has repaid the value of impermissible gifts — $30,936 to his main campaign committee, and $28,127 to 10 private individuals or companies. The report shows that the gifts ranged from air travel, to lodging and meals, to golf outings, car rental, and even a pair of Le Chameau boots.
“I have made each of the payments recommended by the Committee and have taken significant steps since 2007 to strengthen my office’s policies for compliance with the Code of Conduct to ensure that these types of oversights do not happen again,” Young said in his Friday statement. “It is through these actions that I show my colleagues and Alaskans that I fully respect the House Rules and will continue to comply with them now and in the future.”
The committee says it recognizes the steps Young has taken to be in compliance. But Young’s regret and his efforts at compliance, it says, “do not overcome the need for a letter of reproval.”
“Accordingly, based on your conduct in this matter, the committee has unanimously determined that you should be publicly reproved,” states the letter dated June 18 to Young from Ethics Committee Chairman Mike Conaway of Texas and ranking member Linda Sanchez of Alaska.
One outside government watch group was clearly unimpressed with the Ethics Committee’s decision not to go further, calling it a “non-penalty.”
“Not exactly the sort of strong action that will send shivers down the spines of corrupt lawmakers anywhere,” Melanie Sloan, Executive Director of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, said in a statement.
“As if the non-penalty weren’t ridiculous enough, the committee laughably ‘commended’ Rep. Young for his recent efforts at complying with the rules … only members of Congress could be so blind to the wrongdoing of one of their own. Just when you think the Ethics Committee can’t do anything more embarrassing, it does. No wonder Congress has a lower approval rating than cockroaches,” said Sloan.
The investigation dates from April 23, 2010, when Young himself asked the committee to look at certain gifts he had received that the Justice Department was then reviewing.
Later that year, in August, the Justice Department sent a letter to the Ethics Committee indicating it had investigated the gifts and was referring the matter to the panel. After about two years of delays that the committee acknowledges was, in part, caused by itself — as well as disputes with both Young and the Justice Department regarding legal discovery of information in their possession — the committee eventually appointed a special investigative subcommittee in the matter.
That subcommittee ultimately interviewed 16 witness, including a former Young chief of staff, former campaign manager, and other staffers, as well as other individuals who were participants on some of the trips. In all, the subcommittee issued 20 subpoenas.
The subcommittee vote April 29 to issue its report to the full committee. Its report said that Young had violated House rules and other laws, as well as standards of conduct. The subcommittee recommended the committee issue a letter of reproval, require Young to repay the costs of the impermissible trips and gifts, and amend his financial-disclosure statements.
But the subcommittee said it did not believe that a sanction requiring action by the full House was warranted.
What We're Following See More »
Newt Gringrich is actively positioning himself as a possible VP nominee for Donald Trump, according to National Review. After a New York Times piece mentioned him as a possible running mate, he said, "It is an honor to be mentioned. We need a new Contract with America to outline a 100-day plan to take back Washington from the lobbyists, bureaucrats, unions, and leftists. After helping in 1980 with Reagan and 1995 as speaker I know we have to move boldly and decisively before the election results wear off and the establishment starts fighting us. That is my focus." Meanwhile, Trump told CNN he'd be "interested in vetting" John Kasich as well.
"House Democrats are stepping up pressure on Republicans to advance legislation addressing Puerto Rico’s worsening debt crisis by issuing a report arguing that austerity cuts can’t be sustained and have made the island more vulnerable to the mosquito-borne Zika virus." Democrats on the House Natural Resources Committee released a report yesterday that argued "further sharp reductions in government spending can’t be a part of a legislative solution"—especially with a rainy season boosting the mosquito population and stressing an island health system already struggling to deal with the Zika virus.
"ISIS has the capability to stage a Paris-style attack in the U.S. using local cells to strike in multiple locations and inflict dozens of casualties, according to the Obama administration's top U.S. intelligence official." Director of National Intelligence James Clapper told CNN's Peter Bergen that such a scenario is "something we worry about a lot in the United States, that they could conjure up a raid like they did in Paris or Brussels."
"Donald J. Trump said on Wednesday that he expected to reveal his vice presidential pick sometime in July—before the Republican National Convention in Cleveland—but added that he would soon announce a committee to handle the selection process, which would include Dr. Ben Carson." He said he's inclined to name a traditional political figure, unlike himself.
"Groups have flocked to the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs to ask for last-minute changes" to the Department of Labor's new overtime rules, which would require that businesses pay overtime to any salaried employee making more than $50,440 per year, up from the current $23,660. Business interests, as well as some nonprofits, say the move could lead to mass change in workers' statuses, from salaried to hourly. "The White House office held 22 meetings on the proposal in April, according to its calendar, and groups say more meetings are planned this week." Last month, National Journal's Alex Brown reported on how the change might affect Washington.