Conservatives Fail to Delay Leadership Votes; McCarthy, Scalise Looking Strong

Thursday’s House leadership race looks to favor the most established candidates.

Rep. Steve Scalise
National Journal
Tim Alberta Sarah Mimms
June 18, 2014, 7:10 a.m.

House con­ser­vat­ives failed Wed­nes­day morn­ing with a last-ditch ef­fort to delay Thursday’s lead­er­ship elec­tions by one week, a vic­tory for well-or­gan­ized can­did­ates like Ma­jor­ity Whip Kev­in Mc­Carthy and Rep. Steve Scal­ise, both of whom are favored to win their re­spect­ive races.

Con­ser­vat­ives have quietly been talk­ing for sev­er­al days about at­tempt­ing to move back Thursday’s elec­tion, say­ing the short turn­around — it will be held just eight days after Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Eric Can­tor an­nounced his forth­com­ing resig­na­tion — was not fair to can­did­ates who are not as well-known throughout the con­fer­ence.

Rep. Ted Yoho, a con­ser­vat­ive second-term law­maker, tackled the is­sue head-on Wed­nes­day morn­ing fol­low­ing a sched­uled “can­did­ates for­um,” pro­pos­ing a res­ol­u­tion to push back the elec­tion by one week. Such a delay would have be­nefited Reps. Raul Lab­rador and Marlin Stutz­man, who are un­der­dogs in their re­spect­ive con­tests for ma­jor­ity lead­er and ma­jor­ity whip — in part be­cause they have had little time to or­gan­ize and com­mu­nic­ate with col­leagues across the House GOP.

“Look, if your op­pon­ents’ main strategy is to come in second, then I’m here to help them achieve that goal,” Scal­ise said.

Lead­er­ship put it up for a voice vote, and the res­ol­u­tion failed — but not by a wide mar­gin, ac­cord­ing to its pro­ponents.

“I felt com­fort­able with the way it turned out,” Yoho said after the meet­ing. Asked why he in­tro­duced the res­ol­u­tion, he replied: “Be­cause we’re rush­ing in­to this. This is a his­tor­ic and mo­ment­ous time in our na­tion’s his­tory. And to rush in­to this, we’re not do­ing our due di­li­gence. … I’ve got mem­bers com­ing up to me and say­ing, ‘I don’t know Raul. I don’t know Marlin.’”

He ad­ded: “Mr. Can­tor is go­ing to be here un­til Ju­ly 31. There’s no reas­on to rush in­to this. And I just think it’s wrong.”

The im­pact of the tight turn­around is be­ing felt more acutely in the whip’s race — par­tially be­cause Lab­rador was al­ways go­ing to be a long shot to de­feat Mc­Carthy, but also be­cause the cam­paign to re­place Mc­Carthy is a three-can­did­ate af­fair. With both Scal­ise and Rep. Peter Roskam well-known and well con­nec­ted throughout the con­fer­ence, Stutz­man, hav­ing less than a week to or­gan­ize his cam­paign, has settled on the only strategy he can: to force a second bal­lot.

“Get to the second bal­lot,” Stutz­man told Na­tion­al Journ­al after Wed­nes­day’s for­um. “On the second bal­lot, all bets are off.”

Rep. Jim Jordan of Ohio, who is whip­ping votes for Stutz­man, said their team is fo­cused solely on elim­in­at­ing someone — it would have to be Roskam — on the first bal­lot. If suc­cess­ful, only then will their at­ten­tion turn to de­feat­ing Scal­ise head-to-head. “We can multi-task some­times but at this mo­ment we are not [fo­cused on the second bal­lot],” Jordan said.

Scal­ise, whom both rivals’ camps ac­know­ledge as the front-run­ner, told re­port­ers that his team has con­tin­gency plans for a second and even, po­ten­tially, a third bal­lot. “We are talk­ing to people in both camps,” he said, about switch­ing their al­le­gi­ances later in the pro­cess if no can­did­ate gets a ma­jor­ity on the first vote.

“Look, if your op­pon­ents’ main strategy is to come in second, then I’m here to help them achieve that goal,” Scal­ise said.

The can­did­ates for­um offered the five can­did­ates for the two lead­er­ship jobs a chance to make their first and only pitch to the en­tire GOP Con­fer­ence be­fore Thursday af­ter­noon’s vote. But there were no fire­works; in­deed, ac­cord­ing to people in the room, the con­tenders were telling their col­leagues be­hind closed doors al­most ex­actly what they’ve been say­ing in pub­lic.

“It was noth­ing too pro­found,” said Rep. Peter King of New York.

That said, at­tend­ance at the for­um was con­spicu­ously sparse. Many mem­bers were seen fil­ing in­to the meet­ing room, loc­ated in the House base­ment, at least an hour in­to the sched­uled event. Sources in the room said the first peri­od of the meet­ing, ded­ic­ated to a ques­tion-and-an­swer ses­sion with Mc­Carthy and Lab­rador, was at­ten­ded by only 50 or 60 law­makers — the vast ma­jor­ity of whom were Lab­rador sup­port­ers there to voice frus­tra­tions with the cur­rent lead­er­ship team. That so many mem­bers ar­rived only for the por­tion ded­ic­ated to the whip’s race re­flects the be­lief that Mc­Carthy already has the ma­jor­ity lead­er’s post locked down.

The elec­tions will be held in private Thursday af­ter­noon, and the vot­ing is by secret bal­lot. If Mc­Carthy wins the lead­er’s race, as ex­pec­ted, a sub­sequent elec­tion will be held im­me­di­ately there­after to re­place him as whip.

Stutz­man said Wed­nes­day that he has spoken with both Scal­ise and Roskam this week, and while the Hoo­si­er State law­maker in­sisted he’s “run­ning to win,” he didn’t shut the door on cut­ting a deal with either of his com­pet­it­ors. “I’ll talk to any­body,” Stutz­man said.

Billy House contributed to this article.
What We're Following See More »
BACKING OUT ON BERNIE
Trump Won’t Debate Sanders After All
1 days ago
THE LATEST

Trump, in a statement: “Based on the fact that the Democratic nominating process is totally rigged and Crooked Hillary Clinton and Deborah Wasserman Schultz will not allow Bernie Sanders to win, and now that I am the presumptive Republican nominee, it seems inappropriate that I would debate the second place finisher. ... I will wait to debate the first place finisher in the Democratic Party, probably Crooked Hillary Clinton, or whoever it may be.”

AKNOWLEDGING THE INEVITABLE
UAW: Time to Unite Behind Hillary
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

"It's about time for unity," said UAW President Dennis Williams. "We're endorsing Hillary Clinton. She's gotten 3 million more votes than Bernie, a million more votes than Donald Trump. She's our nominee." He called Sanders "a great friend of the UAW" while saying Trump "does not support the economic security of UAW families." Some 28 percent of UAW members indicated their support for Trump in an internal survey.

Source:
AP KEEPING COUNT
Trump Clinches Enough Delegates for the Nomination
2 days ago
THE LATEST

"Donald Trump on Thursday reached the number of delegates needed to clinch the Republican nomination for president, completing an unlikely rise that has upended the political landscape and sets the stage for a bitter fall campaign. Trump was put over the top in the Associated Press delegate count by a small number of the party's unbound delegates who told the AP they would support him at the convention."

Source:
TRUMP FLOATED IDEA ON JIMMY KIMMEL’S SHOW
Trump/Sanders Debate Before California Primary?
3 days ago
THE LATEST
CAMPAIGNS INJECTED NEW AD MONEY
California: It’s Not Over Yet
3 days ago
THE LATEST

"Clinton and Bernie Sanders "are now devoting additional money to television advertising. A day after Sanders announced a new ad buy of less than $2 million in the state, Clinton announced her own television campaign. Ads featuring actor Morgan Freeman as well as labor leader and civil rights activist Dolores Huerta will air beginning on Fridayin Fresno, Sacramento, and Los Angeles media markets. Some ads will also target Latino voters and Asian American voters. The total value of the buy is about six figures according to the Clinton campaign." Meanwhile, a new poll shows Sanders within the margin of error, trailing Clinton 44%-46%.

Source:
×