Why the GOP Still Struggles With Polling

Cantor’s shocking defeat proves there’s still plenty of room for improvement.

U.S. Speaker of the House Rep. John Boehner (R-OH) (L) speaks as House Majority Leader Rep. Eric Cantor (R-VA) (R) looks on during a news conference after a House Republicans Conference meeting December 3, 2013 on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC. House GOPs held the meeting to discuss their agenda.
National Journal
Alex Roarty
See more stories about...
Alex Roarty
June 15, 2014, 3:56 p.m.

Re­pub­lic­ans vowed to fix the polling prob­lems that plagued their 2012 cam­paigns.

It looks as though they still have some work to do.

Eric’s Can­tor’s shock­ing de­feat Tues­day is be­ing blamed on any num­ber of factors. But among the seasoned Re­pub­lic­an cam­paign op­er­at­ives, the biggest in­tern­al cul­prit is seen as the ma­jor­ity lead­er’s long­time poll­ster, John McLaugh­lin, whose sur­vey of the Vir­gin­ia race showed Can­tor lead­ing his op­pon­ent by 34 points. Can­tor went on to lose by 11 points — an un­fathom­able 45-point swing.

The er­ror was re­min­is­cent of the lit­any of polling mis­takes made by Re­pub­lic­an cam­paigns in the 2012 elec­tion, when the party’s in­tern­al data pre­dicted everything from vic­tory for Mitt Rom­ney to marked gains in the House and Sen­ate. But while those prob­lems were rooted in dif­fi­culty sur­vey­ing young and minor­ity voters, the mis­steps in Can­tor’s race un­der­score an­oth­er di­lemma for Re­pub­lic­ans: The con­tin­ued re­li­ance, by at least some of their can­did­ates, on poll­sters with poor track re­cords.

It’s not as if McLaugh­lin’s sur­veys were held in high es­teem be­fore Tues­day. His polls were routinely off the mark in 2012, miss­ing wildly in a host of pres­id­en­tial states such as Col­or­ado and Vir­gin­ia. His repu­ta­tion wasn’t good in of­fi­cial Re­pub­lic­an circles: One GOP cam­paign aide con­firmed that McLaugh­lin was not on the Na­tion­al Re­pub­lic­an Con­gres­sion­al Com­mit­tee’s list of pre­ferred poll­sters. Among GOP op­er­at­ives, his poor track re­cord was well-known.

Ex­cept, ap­par­ently, with Can­tor, who had used McLaugh­lin for years.

“Can­tor has used him for the start,” said one Re­pub­lic­an poll­ster, who re­ques­ted an­onym­ity to speak can­didly. “He did [former Vir­gin­ia Sen. George] Al­len’s cam­paign, did [former Vir­gin­ia Gov. Jim] Gilmore’s cam­paign. He’s had a long track re­cord and done a lot of oth­er things in this busi­ness; if can­did­ates work with some­body and have a good work­ing re­la­tion­ship with them, they tend to stay with them.”

“Prob­ably up un­til this point, there’s no reas­on to make a change,” the source ad­ded. “Now that there is, it’s a moot point.”

Ex­plan­a­tions for the er­ror vary. McLaugh­lin him­self told Na­tion­al Journ­al that he thought Demo­crat­ic in­ter­fer­ence had played a role, and he blamed high­er-than-ex­pec­ted turnout. Turnout was, in fact, about a third high­er than in Can­tor’s last primary, but most ana­lysts have mocked the sug­ges­tion that Demo­crats tipped the elec­tion in Dave Brat’s fa­vor. (For one, the ma­jor­ity lead­er ac­tu­ally earned few­er votes in 2014 than in 2012, des­pite the in­crease in turnout.)

McLaugh­lin was also not the only poll­ster whose polls missed the mark. In an early June sur­vey, Vox Pop­uli, a GOP polling firm that formed just this year, found Can­tor win­ning by 12 points, 52 per­cent to 40 per­cent.

Brent Seaborn, a poll­ster with Vox Pop­uli, sug­ges­ted that Brat’s late mo­mentum helped skew the race in his favo — but he also be­lieved, like McLaugh­lin, that med­dling from the oth­er party helped con­trib­ute to the er­rant poll.

“We be­lieve that Brat sig­ni­fic­antly closed the gap in the days lead­ing up to Elec­tion Day,” Seaborn said. “Ad­di­tion­ally, we be­lieve many more in­de­pend­ent and Demo­crat voters we had fa­vor­ing Brat turned out.”

The in­ac­curacies have been seized on by politicos with­in and out­side the Re­pub­lic­an Party as proof that their polls can’t be taken ser­i­ously. McLaugh­lin also polls for Rep. Jack King­ston, who is in a run­off race against former busi­ness ex­ec­ut­ive Dav­id Per­due in a fight for the GOP Sen­ate nom­in­a­tion in Geor­gia. A spokes­man for Per­due’s cam­paign mocked in­tern­al polls taken by McLaugh­lin and re­leased by the King­ston cam­paign that showed the House mem­ber lead­ing the race.

The Demo­crat­ic Sen­at­ori­al Cam­paign Com­mit­tee, in an email sent a day after Can­tor’s de­feat, sug­ges­ted that neither McLaugh­lin nor Vox Pop­uli should be taken ser­i­ously.

“Vox Pop­uli was off by a whop­ping 33 points. For too long, DC me­dia and elec­tion ‘fore­casters’ have taken Vox Pop­uli and McLaugh­lin ser­i­ously, in­cor­por­at­ing them in­to their Sen­ate fore­casts des­pite McLaugh­lin’s ter­rible 2012 re­cord and Vox Pop­uli’s laugh­able bi­as. Will last night’s un­be­liev­ably wrong pre­dic­tion change any­thing?”

Those con­cerns could spread to oth­er Re­pub­lic­an poll­sters.

“You’re go­ing to have a lot of people tak­ing stock of who their poll­sters are, and wheth­er their data is ac­cur­ate,” said one GOP strategist.

What We're Following See More »
SHE’LL HAVE A ROLE WITH CLINTON CAMP
Wasserman Schultz to Resign at Week’s End
2 hours ago
THE LATEST

"After hours of private talks," Debbie Wasserman Schultz agreed to step down as chair of the Democratic National Committee after the convention ends. In the wake of the convention intrigue, Hillary Clinton announced she's making Wasserman Schultz "the honorary chair of her campaign's 50-state program."

Source:
MARCIA FUDGE TO PRESIDE
Wasserman Schultz Stripped of Convention Duties
10 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Democratic National Committee Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz "will not have a major speaking role or preside over daily convention proceedings this week," and is under increasing pressure to resign. The DNC Rules Committee on Saturday named Ohio Democratic Rep. Marcia Fudge as "permanent chair of the convention." At issue: internal DNC emails leaked by Wikileaks that show how "the DNC favored Clinton during the primary and tried to take down Bernie Sanders by questioning his religion."

Source:
EARLY BUMP FOR TRUMP?
New Round of Polls Show a Tight Race
2 days ago
THE LATEST
  • A Rasmussen Reports poll shows Donald Trump ahead of Hillary Clinton, 43%-42%, the fourth week in a row he's led the poll (one of the few poll in which he's led consistently of late).
  • A Reuters/Ipsos survey shows Clinton leading 40%-36%. In a four-way race, she maintains her four-point lead, 39%-35%, with Gary Johnson and Jill Stein pulling 7% and 3%, respectively.
  • And the LA Times/USC daily tracking poll shows a dead heat, with Trump ahead by about half a percentage point.
BELLWETHER?
Candidates Deadlocked in Ohio
3 days ago
THE LATEST
17-POINT EDGE AMONG MILLENNIALS
Clinton Dominates Among Younger Voters
3 days ago
THE DETAILS

In an election between two candidates around 70 years of age, millennials strongly prefer one over the other. Hillary Clinton has a 47%-30% edge among votes 18 to 29. She also leads 46%-36% among voters aged 30 to 44.

Source:
×