Tea Partiers Are Unsatisfied With a Wide Range of House Leadership Options

Kevin McCarthy backer Devin Nunes calls complainers “exotic members” who “obviously aren’t conservative.”

Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-MN) confers with U.S. Rep. Steve King (R-IA) during a news conference at the U.S. Capitol July 13, 2011 in Washington, DC.
National Journal
Sarah Mimms Elahe Izadi
June 12, 2014, 10:12 a.m.

House Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Eric Can­tor fell to shock­ing de­feat at the hands of a man who labeled him as pro-am­nesty. This should be the per­fect op­por­tun­ity for the most vo­cal and hard-line op­pon­ents of im­mig­ra­tion re­form — their sup­port­ers helped topple one of the most power­ful men in Wash­ing­ton.

Mem­bers of the con­ser­vat­ive Re­pub­lic­an Study Com­mit­tee are run­ning for both ma­jor­ity lead­er and to re­place Rep. Kev­in Mc­Carthy as ma­jor­ity whip, should he win the top con­test.

But still, some tea parti­ers aren’t happy.

Re­pub­lic­an Reps. Steve King and Michele Bach­mann, both hard-liners on im­mig­ra­tion, are eye­ing the pos­sible duel elec­tions with an air of de­pres­sion, ar­guing that none of the can­did­ates for either po­s­i­tion will feel any dif­fer­ently about im­mig­ra­tion than his pre­de­cessors.

And the only solu­tion they’ve got to of­fer: Delay the June 19 lead­er­ship elec­tion “so that we can ac­tu­ally field a can­did­ate who’s not for am­nesty. That was the res­ult of the elec­tion in Eric Can­tor’s dis­trict,” Bach­mann said. “It would be wrong for us to have an elec­tion for lead­er­ship for the Re­pub­lic­an Con­fer­ence without even one can­did­ate who stands for se­cur­ing our bor­ders and re­ject­ing am­nesty.”

For these law­makers, the cur­rent can­did­ates to be the next ma­jor­ity lead­er have un­sat­is­fact­ory stances. Mc­Carthy has come out in fa­vor of al­low­ing the the un­doc­u­mented to ap­ply for leg­al­iz­a­tion. House Rules Com­mit­tee Chair­man Pete Ses­sions, R-Texas, beat a primary chal­lenger in March who had at­tacked him for sup­port­ing a guest-work­er pro­gram. (Ses­sions, for his part, has em­phas­ized that his po­s­i­tion on im­mig­ra­tion is “bor­der se­cur­ity, bor­der se­cur­ity, bor­der se­cur­ity.”)

Two of the can­did­ates for ma­jor­ity whip — Rep. Marlin Stutz­man, R-Ind., and Deputy Whip Peter Roskam, R-Ill. — have sup­por­ted as­pects of im­mig­ra­tion re­form that the far right has termed “am­nesty” as well. Re­pub­lic­an Study Com­mit­tee Chair­man Steve Scal­ise, R-La., has strongly op­posed their ef­forts.

But even with Scal­ise at the helm of the RSC, a frus­trated Rep. Dev­in Nunes, R-Cal­if., said the tea party is not sat­is­fied. “They don’t like them either,” Nunes said of Roskam and Stutz­man. “They’re not happy with Scal­ise, they’re not happy with Roskam, they’re not happy with Mc­Carthy, they’re not happy with Can­tor, they’re not happy with [House Speak­er John] Boehner, they’re not happy with Ses­sions — so I don’t know who their can­did­ates are.”

Nunes, it should be noted, is a ma­jor sup­port­er and ally of Mc­Carthy.

King and Bach­mann are in the minor­ity in their op­pos­i­tion to all of the can­did­ates and Bach­mann, to be fair, is re­tir­ing at the end of the year. Mc­Carthy and Ses­sions have a “big head start” in their cam­paigns for next ma­jor­ity lead­er that will be dif­fi­cult for oth­ers to over­come. “We don’t have the lineup of con­ser­vat­ive rule-of-law can­did­ates in place, so we’re ask­ing for a delay in this vote so that there’s time for the con­fer­ence to come to its senses,” King said.

The bid to delay a vote is frus­trat­ing not only rank-and-file Re­pub­lic­ans, but many con­ser­vat­ives as well. “They don’t have can­did­ates,” Nunes told re­port­ers. “They just come out here to you guys and com­plain and they blog and they Face­book, but when it’s time to ac­tu­ally raise money and go re­cruit can­did­ates and win elec­tions so that you can stop Obama, which is what they say they want to do, they don’t have a cap­ab­il­ity of do­ing it.”

“They’re ob­vi­ously not con­ser­vat­ive,” Nunes ad­ded, call­ing his col­leagues on the far-right “exot­ic mem­bers.”

King and Bach­mann’s read­ing of Can­tor’s race as a ref­er­en­dum on im­mig­ra­tion and es­tab­lish­ment con­ser­vat­ism, Nunes says, is wrong.

Im­mig­ra­tion re­form did be­come a flash point in Can­tor’s race. His op­pon­ent, Dave Brat, fo­cused on the ma­jor­ity lead­er’s sup­port for a path­way to cit­izen­ship for chil­dren brought here il­leg­ally. Na­tion­al tea-party groups largely sat the race out and spent al­most no money in the dis­trict, but Brat had the back­ing — and plat­form — of people like pop­u­lar con­ser­vat­ive ra­dio show host Laura In­gra­ham. In real­ity, there were many con­trib­ut­ing factors to Can­tor’s loss, in­clud­ing con­stitu­ent ser­vices, time spent in his dis­trict, bad polling, and the re­drawn dis­trict it­self.

King wants Rep. Jim Jordan, a mem­ber of the Re­pub­lic­an Study Com­mit­tee who has re­peatedly said he will not run for lead­er­ship, to re­con­sider a bid. Bach­mann is dis­ap­poin­ted Rep. Jeb Hensarling, R-Texas, de­cided to bow out. When asked how many oth­er law­makers are like­wise on the prowl with them for someone who is “anti-am­nesty,” King turned to a gaggle of re­port­ers and said, “You’re go­ing to send the mes­sage out to them and let’s just see.”

So there you have it. Are you a mem­ber of the House of Rep­res­ent­at­ives whose po­s­i­tion on im­mig­ra­tion lines up with King and Bach­mann? Then you may want to give them a call, be­cause they’re look­ing to build a co­ali­tion that can ac­tu­ally sway an elec­tion. And so far, it’s just the two of them.

What We're Following See More »
AND VICE VERSA
Plurality of Trump Voters Just Want to Stop Clinton
14 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

"Nearly half of American voters who support either Democrat Hillary Clinton or Republican Donald Trump for the White House said they will mainly be trying to block the other side from winning, according to a Reuters/Ipsos poll released Thursday." When Trump supporters were asked to give their primary reason for supporting him, 47% said to block Clinton from winning. In almost a mirror image, 46% of Clinton supporters said they were primarily out to thwart Trump.

Source:
IF HE’LL JUST LISTEN…
Many GOPers Still Think Trump Can Be Brought to Heel
31 minutes ago
THE DETAILS
INCLUDING CLINTON
Trump Finance Guru Has History of Contributing to Dems
2 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

"Like Donald Trump himself, the Trump campaign’s new national finance chairman has a long history of contributing to Democrats—including Hillary Clinton. Private investor Steven Mnuchin, Trump’s new campaign fundraising guru, has contributed more than $120,000" to candidates since 1995, about half of which has gone to Democrats.

Source:
AT LEAST NOT YET
Paul Ryan Can’t Get Behind Trump
18 hours ago
THE LATEST

Paul Ryan told CNN today he's "not ready" to back Donald Trump at this time. "I'm not there right now," he said. Ryan said Trump needs to unify "all wings of the Republican Party and the conservative movement" and then run a campaign that will allow Americans to "have something that they're proud to support and proud to be a part of. And we've got a ways to go from here to there."

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trump Roadmapped His Candidacy in 2000
20 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The Daily Beast has unearthed a piece that Donald Trump wrote for Gear magazine in 2000, which anticipates his 2016 sales pitch quite well. "Perhaps it's time for a dealmaker who can get the leaders of Congress to the table, forge consensus, and strike compromise," he writes. Oddly, he opens by defending his reputation as a womanizer: "The hypocrites argue that a man who loves and appreciates beautiful women (and does so legally and openly) shouldn't become a national leader? Is there something wrong with appreciating beautiful women? Don't we want people in public office who show signs of life?"

Source:
×