Tea Partiers Are Unsatisfied With a Wide Range of House Leadership Options

Kevin McCarthy backer Devin Nunes calls complainers “exotic members” who “obviously aren’t conservative.”

Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-MN) confers with U.S. Rep. Steve King (R-IA) during a news conference at the U.S. Capitol July 13, 2011 in Washington, DC.
National Journal
Sarah Mimms Elahe Izadi
June 12, 2014, 10:12 a.m.

House Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Eric Can­tor fell to shock­ing de­feat at the hands of a man who labeled him as pro-am­nesty. This should be the per­fect op­por­tun­ity for the most vo­cal and hard-line op­pon­ents of im­mig­ra­tion re­form — their sup­port­ers helped topple one of the most power­ful men in Wash­ing­ton.

Mem­bers of the con­ser­vat­ive Re­pub­lic­an Study Com­mit­tee are run­ning for both ma­jor­ity lead­er and to re­place Rep. Kev­in Mc­Carthy as ma­jor­ity whip, should he win the top con­test.

But still, some tea parti­ers aren’t happy.

Re­pub­lic­an Reps. Steve King and Michele Bach­mann, both hard-liners on im­mig­ra­tion, are eye­ing the pos­sible duel elec­tions with an air of de­pres­sion, ar­guing that none of the can­did­ates for either po­s­i­tion will feel any dif­fer­ently about im­mig­ra­tion than his pre­de­cessors.

And the only solu­tion they’ve got to of­fer: Delay the June 19 lead­er­ship elec­tion “so that we can ac­tu­ally field a can­did­ate who’s not for am­nesty. That was the res­ult of the elec­tion in Eric Can­tor’s dis­trict,” Bach­mann said. “It would be wrong for us to have an elec­tion for lead­er­ship for the Re­pub­lic­an Con­fer­ence without even one can­did­ate who stands for se­cur­ing our bor­ders and re­ject­ing am­nesty.”

For these law­makers, the cur­rent can­did­ates to be the next ma­jor­ity lead­er have un­sat­is­fact­ory stances. Mc­Carthy has come out in fa­vor of al­low­ing the the un­doc­u­mented to ap­ply for leg­al­iz­a­tion. House Rules Com­mit­tee Chair­man Pete Ses­sions, R-Texas, beat a primary chal­lenger in March who had at­tacked him for sup­port­ing a guest-work­er pro­gram. (Ses­sions, for his part, has em­phas­ized that his po­s­i­tion on im­mig­ra­tion is “bor­der se­cur­ity, bor­der se­cur­ity, bor­der se­cur­ity.”)

Two of the can­did­ates for ma­jor­ity whip — Rep. Marlin Stutz­man, R-Ind., and Deputy Whip Peter Roskam, R-Ill. — have sup­por­ted as­pects of im­mig­ra­tion re­form that the far right has termed “am­nesty” as well. Re­pub­lic­an Study Com­mit­tee Chair­man Steve Scal­ise, R-La., has strongly op­posed their ef­forts.

But even with Scal­ise at the helm of the RSC, a frus­trated Rep. Dev­in Nunes, R-Cal­if., said the tea party is not sat­is­fied. “They don’t like them either,” Nunes said of Roskam and Stutz­man. “They’re not happy with Scal­ise, they’re not happy with Roskam, they’re not happy with Mc­Carthy, they’re not happy with Can­tor, they’re not happy with [House Speak­er John] Boehner, they’re not happy with Ses­sions — so I don’t know who their can­did­ates are.”

Nunes, it should be noted, is a ma­jor sup­port­er and ally of Mc­Carthy.

King and Bach­mann are in the minor­ity in their op­pos­i­tion to all of the can­did­ates and Bach­mann, to be fair, is re­tir­ing at the end of the year. Mc­Carthy and Ses­sions have a “big head start” in their cam­paigns for next ma­jor­ity lead­er that will be dif­fi­cult for oth­ers to over­come. “We don’t have the lineup of con­ser­vat­ive rule-of-law can­did­ates in place, so we’re ask­ing for a delay in this vote so that there’s time for the con­fer­ence to come to its senses,” King said.

The bid to delay a vote is frus­trat­ing not only rank-and-file Re­pub­lic­ans, but many con­ser­vat­ives as well. “They don’t have can­did­ates,” Nunes told re­port­ers. “They just come out here to you guys and com­plain and they blog and they Face­book, but when it’s time to ac­tu­ally raise money and go re­cruit can­did­ates and win elec­tions so that you can stop Obama, which is what they say they want to do, they don’t have a cap­ab­il­ity of do­ing it.”

“They’re ob­vi­ously not con­ser­vat­ive,” Nunes ad­ded, call­ing his col­leagues on the far-right “exot­ic mem­bers.”

King and Bach­mann’s read­ing of Can­tor’s race as a ref­er­en­dum on im­mig­ra­tion and es­tab­lish­ment con­ser­vat­ism, Nunes says, is wrong.

Im­mig­ra­tion re­form did be­come a flash point in Can­tor’s race. His op­pon­ent, Dave Brat, fo­cused on the ma­jor­ity lead­er’s sup­port for a path­way to cit­izen­ship for chil­dren brought here il­leg­ally. Na­tion­al tea-party groups largely sat the race out and spent al­most no money in the dis­trict, but Brat had the back­ing — and plat­form — of people like pop­u­lar con­ser­vat­ive ra­dio show host Laura In­gra­ham. In real­ity, there were many con­trib­ut­ing factors to Can­tor’s loss, in­clud­ing con­stitu­ent ser­vices, time spent in his dis­trict, bad polling, and the re­drawn dis­trict it­self.

King wants Rep. Jim Jordan, a mem­ber of the Re­pub­lic­an Study Com­mit­tee who has re­peatedly said he will not run for lead­er­ship, to re­con­sider a bid. Bach­mann is dis­ap­poin­ted Rep. Jeb Hensarling, R-Texas, de­cided to bow out. When asked how many oth­er law­makers are like­wise on the prowl with them for someone who is “anti-am­nesty,” King turned to a gaggle of re­port­ers and said, “You’re go­ing to send the mes­sage out to them and let’s just see.”

So there you have it. Are you a mem­ber of the House of Rep­res­ent­at­ives whose po­s­i­tion on im­mig­ra­tion lines up with King and Bach­mann? Then you may want to give them a call, be­cause they’re look­ing to build a co­ali­tion that can ac­tu­ally sway an elec­tion. And so far, it’s just the two of them.

What We're Following See More »
BACKING OUT ON BERNIE
Trump Won’t Debate Sanders After All
1 days ago
THE LATEST

Trump, in a statement: “Based on the fact that the Democratic nominating process is totally rigged and Crooked Hillary Clinton and Deborah Wasserman Schultz will not allow Bernie Sanders to win, and now that I am the presumptive Republican nominee, it seems inappropriate that I would debate the second place finisher. ... I will wait to debate the first place finisher in the Democratic Party, probably Crooked Hillary Clinton, or whoever it may be.”

AKNOWLEDGING THE INEVITABLE
UAW: Time to Unite Behind Hillary
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

"It's about time for unity," said UAW President Dennis Williams. "We're endorsing Hillary Clinton. She's gotten 3 million more votes than Bernie, a million more votes than Donald Trump. She's our nominee." He called Sanders "a great friend of the UAW" while saying Trump "does not support the economic security of UAW families." Some 28 percent of UAW members indicated their support for Trump in an internal survey.

Source:
AP KEEPING COUNT
Trump Clinches Enough Delegates for the Nomination
2 days ago
THE LATEST

"Donald Trump on Thursday reached the number of delegates needed to clinch the Republican nomination for president, completing an unlikely rise that has upended the political landscape and sets the stage for a bitter fall campaign. Trump was put over the top in the Associated Press delegate count by a small number of the party's unbound delegates who told the AP they would support him at the convention."

Source:
TRUMP FLOATED IDEA ON JIMMY KIMMEL’S SHOW
Trump/Sanders Debate Before California Primary?
2 days ago
THE LATEST
CAMPAIGNS INJECTED NEW AD MONEY
California: It’s Not Over Yet
2 days ago
THE LATEST

"Clinton and Bernie Sanders "are now devoting additional money to television advertising. A day after Sanders announced a new ad buy of less than $2 million in the state, Clinton announced her own television campaign. Ads featuring actor Morgan Freeman as well as labor leader and civil rights activist Dolores Huerta will air beginning on Fridayin Fresno, Sacramento, and Los Angeles media markets. Some ads will also target Latino voters and Asian American voters. The total value of the buy is about six figures according to the Clinton campaign." Meanwhile, a new poll shows Sanders within the margin of error, trailing Clinton 44%-46%.

Source:
×