Raul Labrador is quietly considering a campaign for House majority leader, according to a source familiar with the congressman’s thinking, potentially setting up a head-to-head contest with Majority Whip Kevin McCarthy to replace Eric Cantor.
“He’s getting a lot of encouragement from other members,” the source said.
Labrador was approached by several influential conservative members Thursday morning after Rep. Jeb Hensarling announced he would not challenge McCarthy for the No. 2 spot in leadership.
While Labrador enjoys strong support among the most conservative members of the House GOP, it’s unclear whether he would have the ability — with the special election less than a week away — to build a broader coalition capable of giving McCarthy a competitive race.
As Labrador contemplated their encouragement to enter the race, another Republican, Rep. Pete Sessions, dropped his bid.
Labrador is now carefully considering whether he wants to enter the fray — and whether he could possibly win.
An outspoken sophomore lawmaker from Idaho, he is one of the most popular tea-party-allied members of the GOP’s right flank.
Labrador has occasionally rubbed some Republicans the wrong way with his vocal criticism of the current leadership team. He has frequently attacked that team for being too passive and is one of 12 members who refused to support Speaker John Boehner’s reelection. He has consistently said the leadership team is not representative of the conference because it does not include a red-state Republican.
Labrador’s name has occasionally been mentioned as a dark-horse candidate for a leadership position. In fact, earlier this year, Labrador joked in an interview with National Journal that he might “do something crazy” like run for speaker of the House.
It’s unclear what his timetable is for making a decision. Many lawmakers have already left Washington and will not return until Monday.
This story was updated with the news that Rep. Sessions had dropped his bid for majority leader.
- 1 High Court Vacancy Spells Trouble for Congress
- 2 Why Four Justices Were Against the Supreme Court’s Huge Gay-Marriage Decision
- 3 The Winners and Losers From the South Carolina Republican Debate
- 4 Can Obama Unilaterally Raise the Minimum Wage?
- 5 FBI’s Facial-Recognition Technology Has Achieved ‘Full Operational Capability’
What We're Following See More »
Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”
“We haven’t seen a true leftist since FDR, so many millions are coming out of the woodwork to vote for Bernie Sanders; he is the Occupy movement now come to life in the political arena.” So says Bill Maher in his Hollywood Reporter cover story (more a stream-of-consciousness riff than an essay, actually). Conservative states may never vote for a socialist in the general election, but “this stuff has never been on the table, and these voters have never been activated.” Maher saves most of his bile for Donald Trump and Sarah Palin, writing that by nominating Palin as vice president “John McCain is the one who opened the Book of the Dead and let the monsters out.” And Trump is picking up where Palin left off.