Congress’s Iraq Vets Helplessly Watch Their Gains Lost

“What was the point of all that?” Perry asks of U.S. action as Mosul and Tikrit fall to extremists.

Iraqi families fleeing violence in the northern Nineveh province gather at a Kurdish checkpoint in Aski kalak, 40 kms West of Arbil, in the autonomous Kurdistan region, on June 11, 2014. Since the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant began their spectacular assault in Mosul late on June 9, militants have captured a large swathe of northern and north-central Iraq, prompting as many as half a million people to flee their homes. 
National Journal
Clara Ritger
June 11, 2014, 5:28 p.m.

Amer­ic­ans are tired of war. For the 17 mem­bers of Con­gress who served in Ir­aq, that means watch­ing help­lessly as the cit­ies they fought for fall once more to ex­trem­ists.

Mil­it­ants be­lieved to be as­so­ci­ated with al-Qaida over­took Mo­sul, the second-largest city in Ir­aq, on Tues­day. The group then seized Tikrit, ho­met­own of former Pres­id­ent Sad­dam Hus­sein, on Wed­nes­day.

Three Re­pub­lic­an con­gress­men who served in Ir­aq — Scott Perry of Pennsylvania, Doug Collins of Geor­gia, and Brad Wen­strup of Ohio — said it feels like the pro­gress they made has been thrown away.

“Go­ing out across the desert I re­mem­ber the feel­ings that you have, won­der­ing if you’re go­ing to make it out alive,” Perry said. “Right now I won­der what that was all about. What was the point of all of that?”

A se­cur­ity agree­ment was what Perry, Collins, and Wen­strup wanted to see come out of the war, one that would al­low U.S. troops to re­main in­volved in the re­gion when the en­emy — thought to be the Is­lam­ic State in Ir­aq and Syr­ia — re­turned.

“We have an en­emy today that senses weak­ness, knows how to find it, and then goes after it,” Wen­strup said. “I think Ir­aq maybe thought they could [de­fend them­selves]. This was an op­por­tun­ity for us to have an­oth­er ally in the re­gion. I came home from Ir­aq feel­ing that we lib­er­ated 25 mil­lion people.”

But that free­dom is in jeop­ardy, Wen­strup said, if Ir­aqi cit­izens can­not or will not fight back.

And none of the con­gress­men thought there was much the United States could do.

“I think at this point the ad­min­is­tra­tion made a choice to cut and run,” Collins said. “When Fal­lu­jah fell again, we knew this for­eign policy had con­sequences. Aside from an in­ter­ven­tion, which I don’t think is on any­body’s mind, Ir­aq is go­ing to have de­fend for it­self. At this point we’ll see if the Ir­aqi se­cur­ity forces are cap­able.”

Fal­lu­jah fell to mil­it­ants in Janu­ary. The city was taken by U.S. forces in late 2004 at the cost of more than 100 Amer­ic­an sol­diers’ lives, the blood­i­est battle of the Ir­aq War.

The Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion ac­know­ledges the set­backs in Ir­aq.

“On the bat­tle­field, it can­not be con­sidered a suc­cess,” said Robert Beec­roft, former U.S. am­bas­sad­or to Ir­aq, at a Sen­ate com­mit­tee hear­ing Wed­nes­day. “It’s a struggle. We’re do­ing what we can to sup­port them with equip­ment, as­sist­ance, train­ing, and shar­ing any in­tel­li­gence.”

Re­ports from Mo­sul said the Ir­aqis changed out of their mil­it­ary uni­forms, aban­doned their weapons, and fled their homes to es­cape the vi­ol­ence.

“It seems to me that the Ir­aqis laid down a lot of the arms that we gave to them,” Wen­strup said. “So that doesn’t seem to be the solu­tion.”

At the Sen­ate hear­ing, the pres­id­ent’s nom­in­ee to serve as the next am­bas­sad­or to Ir­aq, Stu­art Jones, ex­pressed con­fid­ence that Ir­aq could de­fend it­self, and said groups are com­ing to­geth­er to re­spond to the at­tacks.

“We will con­tin­ue to work with our in­ter­na­tion­al part­ners to try to meet the needs of those who have been dis­placed, and we will try to work with the se­cur­ity forces in their fight against [IS­IS],” Jones said.

And that may be all the U.S. can do, save from chan­ging course on the pres­id­ent’s for­eign policy and send­ing troops back in­to the re­gion.

The vet­er­ans in Con­gress also har­bor doubts about what will hap­pen in Afgh­anistan, where U.S. troops are set to leave by 2016. But Amer­ica isn’t ral­ly­ing to step back in­to the war — and that means liv­ing with the con­sequences of let­ting Ir­aq and Afgh­anistan de­fend them­selves.

“I don’t think we’re power­less,” Perry said. “I think we can help form pub­lic opin­ion, which will help to guide [Obama] to some ex­tent. But I don’t think there’s any ap­pet­ite from the Amer­ic­an people to go back and do our work twice.”

What We're Following See More »
“CLINTON MUST BECOME THE NEXT PRESIDENT”
Bernie Sanders Seeks to Unite the Party
3 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Instead of his usual stump speech, Bernie Sanders tonight threw his support behind Hillary Clinton, providing a clear contrast between Clinton and GOP nominee Donald Trump on the many issues he used to discuss in his campaign stump speeches. Sanders spoke glowingly about the presumptive Democratic nominee, lauding her work as first lady and as a strong advocate for women and the poor. “We need leadership in this country which will improve the lives of working families, the children, the elderly, the sick and the poor,” he said. “Hillary Clinton will make a great president, and I am proud to stand with her tonight."

“MUST NEVER BE PRESIDENT”
Elizabeth Warren Goes After Donald Trump
4 hours ago
THE DETAILS

In a stark contrast from Michelle Obama's uplifting speech, Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren spoke about the rigged system plaguing Americans before launching into a full-throated rebuke of GOP nominee Donald Trump. Trump is "a man who has never sacrificed anything for anyone," she claimed, before saying he "must never be president of the United States." She called him divisive and selfish, and said the American people won't accept his "hate-filled America." In addition to Trump, Warren went after the Republican Party as a whole. "To Republicans in Congress who said no, this November the American people are coming for you," she said.

FLOTUS OFFERS STRONG ENDORSEMENT OF CLINTON
Michelle Obama: “I Trust” Hillary Clinton
4 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"In this election, and every election, it's about who will have the power to shape our children for the next four or eight years of their lives," Michelle Obama said. "There is only one person who I trust with that responsibility … and that is our friend Hillary Clinton." In a personal and emotional speech, Michelle Obama spoke about the effect that angry oppositional rhetoric had on her children and how she chose to raise them. "When they go low, we go high," Obama said she told her children about dealing with bullies. Obama stayed mostly positive, but still offered a firm rebuke of Donald Trump, despite never once uttering his name. "The issues a president faces cannot be boiled down to 140 characters," she said.

SANDERS BACKER CONFRONTS STUBBORN SANDERS SUPPORTERS
Sarah Silverman to Bernie or Bust: “You’re Being Ridiculous”
5 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Many Bernie Sanders delegates have spent much of the first day of the Democratic National Convention resisting unity, booing at mentions of Hillary Clinton and often chanting "Bernie! Bernie!" Well, one of the most outspoken Bernie Sanders supporters just told them to take a seat. "To the Bernie-or-bust people: You're being ridiculous," said comedian Sarah Silverman in a brief appearance at the Convention, minutes after saying that she would proudly support Hillary Clinton for president.

‘INEXCUSABLE REMARKS’
DNC Formally Apologizes to Bernie Sanders
9 hours ago
THE LATEST

The Democratic National Committee issued a formal apology to Bernie Sanders today, after leaked emails showed staffers trying to sabotage his presidential bid. "On behalf of everyone at the DNC, we want to offer a deep and sincere apology to Senator Sanders, his supporters, and the entire Democratic Party for the inexcusable remarks made over email," DNC officials said in the statement. "These comments do not reflect the values of the DNC or our steadfast commitment to neutrality during the nominating process. The DNC does not—and will not—tolerate disrespectful language exhibited toward our candidates."

Source:
×