Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx on Tuesday said it’s time to “get past gimmicks” and focus on a longer-term solution for keeping the nation’s highway funding from drying up this summer.
Foxx’s remarks came in response to a House Republican idea to cut Saturday postal deliveries as a way to create savings that could be used to keep the highway fund solvent for another year.
“I grew up in an America that played to win. Not an America that played not to lose,” said Foxx, who met earlier Tuesday behind closed doors with House Democrats on Capitol Hill. He described the GOP’s postal-cuts idea as, at best, a one-year patch to replenish the Highway Trust Fund — not “a real solution” to stabilize funding for highways, bridges, and transit and rail systems.
Foxx pointed out that the administration has put forth a longer-range alternative. It has proposed a $302 billion, four-year transportation reauthorization plan, known as the Grow America Act. But the administration’s proposal is funded by supplementing current revenues like the gas tax with $150 billion in onetime “transition” revenue in the form of a “pro-growth business tax “reform” — a tough sell to congressional Republicans.
But something needs to be decided, and soon. The nation’s Highway Trust Fund is projected to dry up by August, at the height of the road and bridge construction season, in what some are now calling a highway funding “cliff” facing Congress.
And Foxx painted a picture of a summer construction season being abruptly halted, with 700,000 jobs potentially at risk. Already, he said, state and local partners in thousands of planned road, bridge, and other infrastructure projects are uncertain about whether to put up the tens of millions of dollars that represent their share of costs to get projects ready.
Senate Democrats and outside conservative groups have ridiculed the postal cuts as a solution. They scoff at its reliance on hypothetical savings over 10 years of diminished Saturday delivery — including the avoidance of some future bailout of the Postal Service if that service continues — as a way to immediately come up with more than $10 billion for the fund.
Foxx declined to reject outright the GOP’s postal-cuts idea, but he made clear that there is not much administration enthusiasm for it.
“All along we have said that if there are other ideas that emerge that we will be willing to consider those things,” Foxx said. “I suppose that’s where we are.”
But he added, “I would point out that on its best day, the proposal that’s being offered on this postal service is a one-year proposal, and so it doesn’t meet the demands of a long-term investment.”
He also warned: “For Americans out there, the potholes are going to get deeper, the travel times are going to get longer, the trips to pick up your kids are going to get longer. It’s just not the way to do business, and that’s the thing we’re trying to change.”
What We're Following See More »
Concerned that she's become too divisive, "Democrats on Capitol Hill are discussing whether Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz should step down as Democratic National Committee (DNC) chairwoman before the party’s national convention in July. ... Wasserman Schultz has had an increasingly acrimonious relationship with the party’s other presidential candidate, Bernie Sanders, and his supporters, who argue she has tilted the scales in Clinton’s favor." The money quote, from a Democratic senator who backs Clinton: “There have been a lot of meetings over the past 48 hours about what color plate do we deliver Debbie Wasserman Schultz’s head on." Meanwhile, Newsweek takes a look at why no one seems to like Wasserman Schultz.
"The U.S. House of Representatives plans to vote Wednesday on a Republican bill that would block the District of Columbia from spending locally raised tax revenue without congressional approval, prompting President Obama to pledge to veto it. In issuing the veto threat on Tuesday, the Obama White House made one of the strongest statements to date in support of the District’s attempt to win financial independence from Congress."
When it comes to name-calling among America's upper echelon of politicians, there may be perhaps no greater spat than the one currently going on between Sen. Elizabeth Warren and Donald Trump. While receiving an award Tuesday night, she continued a months-long feud with the presumptive GOP presidential nominee. Calling him a "small, insecure moneygrubber" who probably doesn't know three things about Dodd-Frank, she said he "will NEVER be president of the United States," according to her prepared remarks."We don't know what Trump pays in taxes because he is the first presidential nominee in 40 years to refuse to disclose his tax returns. Maybe he’s just a lousy businessman who doesn’t want you to find out that he’s worth a lot less money than he claims." It follows a long-line of Warren attacks over Twitter, Facebook and in interviews that Trump is a sexist, racist, narcissistic loser. In reply, Trump has called Warren either "goofy" or "the Indian"—referring to her controversial assertion of her Native American heritage.
Citing the unpredictable nature of this primary season and the possible leverage they could bring at the convention, John Kasich is hanging onto his 161 delegates. "Kasich sent personal letters Monday to Republican officials in the 16 states and the District of Columbia where he won delegates, requesting that they stay bound to him in accordance with party rules."
Bernie Sanders "signed a letter Tuesday morning requesting a full and complete check and recanvass of the election results in Kentucky ... where he trails Hillary Clinton by less than one-half of 1 percent of the vote. The Sanders campaign said it has asked the Kentucky secretary of state to have election officials review electronic voting machines and absentee ballots from last week's primary in each of the state's 120 counties.