Lobbyists Warn Colleges That Participating in Sexual-Assault Survey Could Make Them Look Bad

“What will play well on TV?” lawyers for the American Council on Education ask colleges.

National Journal
Sarah Mimms
June 5, 2014, 1 a.m.

A slideshow pro­duced for a ma­jor edu­ca­tion lob­by­ing group is warn­ing col­leges that par­ti­cip­at­ing in a con­gres­sion­al sur­vey on cam­pus sexu­al as­saults could give them bad press.

After Sen. Claire Mc­Caskill’s re­quests to see a copy of a we­bin­ar the Amer­ic­an Coun­cil on Edu­ca­tion sent out to its mem­bers early last month were re­peatedly re­buffed, ac­cord­ing to her of­fice, the doc­u­ment was leaked to an edu­ca­tion blog on Tues­day. Not long after In­side High­er Ed pub­lished the slides in full, ACE made a copy avail­able to Mc­Caskill’s of­fice. A rep­res­ent­at­ive for ACE said that Mc­Caskill’s of­fice made sev­er­al re­quests for dif­fer­ent pieces of in­form­a­tion about the we­bin­ar, be­fore they sent the copy to her of­fice.

The pub­lished slides lack con­text and are not ac­com­pan­ied by any text or a tran­script of what ACE of­fi­cials said to mem­ber schools, but the mes­sage is clear: Work too closely with Con­gress on this sur­vey, or any fu­ture in­vest­ig­a­tion, and it could come back to bite your in­sti­tu­tion. The group said Thursday that they did not have a tran­script or re­cord­ing of the call that ac­com­pan­ied the we­bin­ar with its mem­ber schools, but said it was not their in­ten­tion to dis­cour­age schools from par­ti­cip­at­ing in the sur­vey.

ACE rep­res­ents 1,800 two- and four-year col­leges and uni­versit­ies, ac­cord­ing to its web­site.

Mc­Caskill, who was one of the sen­at­ors lead­ing the push for new reg­u­la­tions to com­bat sexu­al as­saults in the mil­it­ary earli­er this year, launched the sur­vey ini­ti­at­ive in April. In or­der to get an idea of how wide­spread sexu­al as­saults are on col­lege cam­puses — one fre­quently cited sur­vey says that one in five wo­men will be raped dur­ing her col­lege ca­reer — Mc­Caskill has asked 350 uni­versit­ies to par­ti­cip­ate in a sur­vey that asks, among oth­er ques­tions, how many sexu­al-as­sault in­vest­ig­a­tions they’ve con­duc­ted in the last five years. (You can see a sample copy of the sur­vey here.)

Some of those schools — though ACE would not say how many or name them — par­ti­cip­ated in a we­bin­ar and call with the lob­by­ing group in early May. ACE says that they were try­ing to lay out the pro­cess and dif­fi­culties of a con­gres­sion­al in­vest­ig­a­tion, not warn schools against par­ti­cip­at­ing in the sur­vey.

But the slides in­clude the cau­tion: “Sur­veys provide fod­der for ad­di­tion­al [con­gres­sion­al] in­vest­ig­a­tion.”

They then go on to warn col­leges and uni­versit­ies that the po­ten­tial scope of a con­gres­sion­al in­quiry is es­sen­tially lim­it­less. In­vest­ig­a­tions con­duc­ted by Con­gress, they say, are polit­ic­ally mo­tiv­ated, char­ac­ter­ized by a “Wild West” ap­proach “without real rules,” sub­ject to leaks to the press, and lack­ing safe­guards for their sub­jects (in­clud­ing at­tor­ney-cli­ent priv­ilege and right of ap­peal). The doc­u­ments do not men­tion, however, that at­tor­ney-cli­ent-priv­ilege claims are hold­ing up the House in­vest­ig­a­tion in­to the scan­dal at the Vet­er­ans Af­fairs De­part­ment.

The slides also ad­vise schools that con­fid­en­ti­al­ity in the sur­vey and po­ten­tial in­vest­ig­a­tion pro­cess is not guar­an­teed, not­ing that mem­bers could hold press con­fer­ences on the pro­ceed­ings. It also ad­vises them to con­sider: “What will play well on TV?”

Mc­Caskill has told all 350 in­sti­tu­tions that the sur­vey will be com­pletely con­fid­en­tial and is not re­leas­ing any of the names of par­ti­cip­at­ing schools.

A Mc­Caskill spokes­wo­man told Na­tion­al Journ­al that some of the schools in­volved in the sur­vey re­por­ted that they felt they were “be­ing warned against co­oper­at­ing.” The sen­at­or’s of­fice is now point­ing to the ACE slides as the cul­prit, though they would not provide the names of any of the par­ti­cip­at­ing schools either.

“It was ab­so­lutely noth­ing we said to in­struct schools to not re­spond to the sur­vey. “¦ Non-co­oper­a­tion would have been a bad strategy,” Cov­ing­ton & Burl­ing part­ner Robert Kel­ner, whose firm pro­duced the slides, said Wed­nes­day.

Kel­ner and ACE gen­er­al coun­sel Ada Meloy both said that the odds of a school be­ing in­vest­ig­ated would go up sig­ni­fic­antly if they did not par­ti­cip­ate in the sur­vey. Kel­ner ad­ded that it would be “fool­ish” not to do so. But neither could say con­fid­ently that that mes­sage was con­veyed to schools on the call.

Kel­ner said that the as­sump­tion of the call was that schools would par­ti­cip­ate, but ad­ded that be­cause the call was for a broad vari­ety of schools, not a spe­cif­ic cli­ent, his firm would not have giv­en any ad­vice on the sur­vey one way or the oth­er. Cov­ing­ton & Burl­ing provided the con­tact in­form­a­tion for three of its at­tor­neys at the end of the slideshow for any schools con­cerned about the leg­al rami­fic­a­tions of an­swer­ing the sur­vey and re­spond­ing to fu­ture con­gres­sion­al in­quir­ies.

“We’d cer­tainly hope mov­ing for­ward that ACE will be more will­ing to work pro­duct­ively with us and its mem­ber in­sti­tu­tions to help com­bat sexu­al as­sault on our col­lege cam­puses,” Mc­Caskill spokes­wo­man Sarah Feld­man said in a state­ment.

Meloy said that her group is happy to con­tin­ue work­ing with Mc­Caskill on re­du­cing sexu­al as­saults on col­lege cam­puses. “We cer­tainly are aligned with her in that de­sire and we’ve giv­en her sev­er­al op­tions of op­por­tun­it­ies to get her mes­sage to our mem­ber or­gan­iz­a­tions,” Meloy said.

This post was up­dated at 6:45 p.m. Wed­nes­day with fur­ther com­ments from ACE and Cov­ing­ton & Burl­ing.

What We're Following See More »
“CLINTON MUST BECOME THE NEXT PRESIDENT”
Bernie Sanders Seeks to Unite the Party
3 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Instead of his usual stump speech, Bernie Sanders tonight threw his support behind Hillary Clinton, providing a clear contrast between Clinton and GOP nominee Donald Trump on the many issues he used to discuss in his campaign stump speeches. Sanders spoke glowingly about the presumptive Democratic nominee, lauding her work as first lady and as a strong advocate for women and the poor. “We need leadership in this country which will improve the lives of working families, the children, the elderly, the sick and the poor,” he said. “Hillary Clinton will make a great president, and I am proud to stand with her tonight."

“MUST NEVER BE PRESIDENT”
Elizabeth Warren Goes After Donald Trump
4 hours ago
THE DETAILS

In a stark contrast from Michelle Obama's uplifting speech, Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren spoke about the rigged system plaguing Americans before launching into a full-throated rebuke of GOP nominee Donald Trump. Trump is "a man who has never sacrificed anything for anyone," she claimed, before saying he "must never be president of the United States." She called him divisive and selfish, and said the American people won't accept his "hate-filled America." In addition to Trump, Warren went after the Republican Party as a whole. "To Republicans in Congress who said no, this November the American people are coming for you," she said.

FLOTUS OFFERS STRONG ENDORSEMENT OF CLINTON
Michelle Obama: “I Trust” Hillary Clinton
4 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"In this election, and every election, it's about who will have the power to shape our children for the next four or eight years of their lives," Michelle Obama said. "There is only one person who I trust with that responsibility … and that is our friend Hillary Clinton." In a personal and emotional speech, Michelle Obama spoke about the effect that angry oppositional rhetoric had on her children and how she chose to raise them. "When they go low, we go high," Obama said she told her children about dealing with bullies. Obama stayed mostly positive, but still offered a firm rebuke of Donald Trump, despite never once uttering his name. "The issues a president faces cannot be boiled down to 140 characters," she said.

SANDERS BACKER CONFRONTS STUBBORN SANDERS SUPPORTERS
Sarah Silverman to Bernie or Bust: “You’re Being Ridiculous”
5 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Many Bernie Sanders delegates have spent much of the first day of the Democratic National Convention resisting unity, booing at mentions of Hillary Clinton and often chanting "Bernie! Bernie!" Well, one of the most outspoken Bernie Sanders supporters just told them to take a seat. "To the Bernie-or-bust people: You're being ridiculous," said comedian Sarah Silverman in a brief appearance at the Convention, minutes after saying that she would proudly support Hillary Clinton for president.

‘INEXCUSABLE REMARKS’
DNC Formally Apologizes to Bernie Sanders
9 hours ago
THE LATEST

The Democratic National Committee issued a formal apology to Bernie Sanders today, after leaked emails showed staffers trying to sabotage his presidential bid. "On behalf of everyone at the DNC, we want to offer a deep and sincere apology to Senator Sanders, his supporters, and the entire Democratic Party for the inexcusable remarks made over email," DNC officials said in the statement. "These comments do not reflect the values of the DNC or our steadfast commitment to neutrality during the nominating process. The DNC does not—and will not—tolerate disrespectful language exhibited toward our candidates."

Source:
×