Congress Knew the White House Had Considered a Prisoner Swap

The administration floated an exchange for Bergdahl in 2011, and lawmakers pushed back. This time, Obama opted to ask forgiveness instead of permission.

House Intelligence Chairman Mike Rogers (R-MI) (R) and House Intelligence ranking member U.S. Rep. Dutch Ruppersberger (D-MD) speak to the media at a news conference on Capitol Hill, March 25, 2014 in Washington, DC.
National Journal
Sara Sorcher
June 3, 2014, 1:24 p.m.

Why didn’t the White House no­ti­fy Con­gress be­fore swap­ping ter­ror­ist sus­pects for Sgt. Bowe Ber­g­dahl? Per­haps be­cause Pres­id­ent Obama knew he’d find res­ist­ance.

He already had once be­fore, ac­cord­ing to an aide to Mike Ro­gers, chair­man of the House In­tel­li­gence Com­mit­tee. In 2011, the ad­min­is­tra­tion floated the pos­sib­il­ity of ex­chan­ging pris­on­ers for the Amer­ic­an POW from the war in Afgh­anistan but then backed off after law­makers from both parties raised ques­tions about the im­pact of the swap on the safety of oth­er U.S. per­son­nel, among oth­er is­sues.

So when Obama de­cided to swap five Taliban ter­ror­ist sus­pects be­ing held at Guantanamo for the cap­tive sol­dier, only a hand­ful of law­makers were told in ad­vance — and then only in the barest de­tail.

Sen­ate Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id was among that small group. The staff dir­ect­or for James In­hofe, the top Re­pub­lic­an on the Sen­ate Armed Ser­vices Com­mit­tee, also re­ceived a call shortly be­fore Obama’s press con­fer­ence on Sat­urday to an­nounce the ex­change. “Ba­sic­ally, they were giv­ing us no­ti­fic­a­tion to tune in­to the press con­fer­ence,” an In­hofe aide said, speak­ing un­der con­di­tion of an­onym­ity be­cause of the sens­it­iv­ity about the timeline. “There were no de­tails provided in that phone call.”

The next day, Sen­ate Armed Ser­vices re­ceived the of­fi­cial no­ti­fic­a­tion — a doc­u­ment ex­plain­ing that the ex­change had already taken place. That too con­tained few de­tails, the aide said, and the com­mit­tee is still chas­ing down the an­swers.

Mem­bers of the House also were left in the dark. Ro­gers was no­ti­fied “after the fact…. Whenev­er the swap happened, he was no­ti­fied sev­er­al hours later,” his aide said. House Armed Ser­vices Com­mit­tee Chair­man Buck McK­eon, too, was caught flat-footed by the an­nounce­ment. “We got a call mid-week, around Wed­nes­day, to the staff dir­ect­or say­ing, ‘Something may hap­pen, some­time soon, stay near your phone,’ ” a McK­eon aide said. “But there was no in­dic­a­tion of what that was, or even the gen­er­al sub­ject mat­ter.”

A few hours after Ber­g­dahl was re­covered, the staff dir­ect­or got an­oth­er call ex­plain­ing what happened. “What was sup­posed to be 30 days ahead, did not come un­til after the fact,” the McK­eon aide said.

Mem­bers of Con­gress al­ways knew it was pos­sible Obama would do this without of­fer­ing any warn­ing, law­makers and aides note, cit­ing the sign­ing state­ment Obama at­tached to the Na­tion­al De­fense Au­thor­iz­a­tion Act for Fisc­al Year 2014. It stated the pres­id­ent in­ten­ded to act swiftly in ne­go­ti­ations with for­eign coun­tries about de­tain­ee trans­fers, im­ply­ing that the 30-day no­tice re­quire­ment would be ig­nored.

“Giv­en that no­tice, mem­bers of Con­gress should not be sur­prised that he ac­ted as he did in the cir­cum­stances that ex­is­ted,” said Sen­ate Armed Ser­vices Com­mit­tee Chair­man Carl Lev­in, who plans to hold a clas­si­fied brief­ing with ad­min­is­tra­tion mem­bers next Tues­day.

Fur­ther, some con­gres­sion­al lead­ers knew the ad­min­is­tra­tion had already thought through such a swap. They had been briefed by seni­or ad­min­is­tra­tion of­fi­cials from the State and De­fense de­part­ments as well as the CIA and Na­tion­al Se­cur­ity Coun­cil in late 2011 and early 2012 about a pos­sible ex­change for Ber­g­dahl, ac­cord­ing to a House in­tel­li­gence com­mit­tee aide. In those meet­ings, Am­bas­sad­or Marc Gross­man and Denis Mc­Donough, who now serves as Obama’s chief of staff, led the dis­cus­sion. 

Law­makers pressed those of­fi­cials for an­swers to ques­tions about how an ex­change might af­fect the timeline for pulling out of Afgh­anistan and wheth­er the swap might en­cour­age ter­ror­ist groups to at­tempt to snatch U.S. per­son­nel.

After the second meet­ing between law­makers and these seni­or ad­min­is­tra­tion of­fi­cials, the White House de­cided against more brief­ings, say­ing the pro­spects of the ex­change had di­min­ished, ac­cord­ing to the com­mit­tee aide. 

The White House might be ac­know­ledging the dam­age it has done to already poor re­la­tions with Con­gress by go­ing for­ward with an ex­change without bring­ing those mem­bers of Con­gress back in­to the loop.

Sen. Di­anne Fein­stein, who chairs the Sen­ate In­tel­li­gence Com­mit­tee, said that Deputy Na­tion­al Se­cur­ity Ad­viser Tony Blinken called her Monday night to say he was sorry law­makers were not no­ti­fied soon­er. “He apo­lo­gized for it and said it was an over­sight,” Fein­stein said.

Clara Ritger contributed to this article.
What We're Following See More »
SHARES THEIR LOVE STORY
Bill Clinton Gets Personal in Convention Speech
45 minutes ago
THE DETAILS

“In the spring of 1971, I met a girl,” started Bill Clinton. In his speech Tuesday night at the Democratic National Convention, Clinton brought a personal touch, telling parallel stories of his relationship with Hillary Clinton and the work she has done throughout her career. He lauded the Democratic nominee for her career of work, touching on her earliest days of advocacy for children and those with disabilities while in law school, her role as Secretary of State, and her work in raising their daughter, Chelsea. Providing a number of anecdotes throughout the speech, Clinton built to a crescendo, imploring the audience to support his wife for president. "You should elect her, she'll never quit when the going gets tough," he said. "Your children and grandchildren will be grateful."

LOUD “BLACK LIVES MATTER” CHANTS RING OUT
Mothers Of The Movement Endorse Hillary Clinton
3 hours ago
THE DETAILS

A coalition of mothers whose children lost their lives in high profile cases across the country, known as the Mothers Of The Movement, were greeted with deafening chants of "Black Lives Matter" before telling their stories. The mothers of Sandra Bland, Jordan Davis, and Trayvon Martin spoke for the group, soliciting both tears and applause from the crowd. "Hillary Clinton has the compassion and understanding to comfort a grieving mother," said Sybrina Fulton, the mother of Trayvon Martin. "And that's why, in the memory of our children, we are imploring you — all of you — to vote this election day."

SOUTH DAKOTA GIVES HER CLINCHING DELEGATES
Clinton Officially Democratic Nominee for President
5 hours ago
THE DETAILS

With the South Dakota delegation announcing its delegate count, Hillary Rodham Clinton is officially the Democratic nominee for president, surpassing the 2383 delegates needed to clinch the nomination. Clinton is expected to speak at the convention on Thursday night and officially accept the nomination.

THE QUESTION
How Many People Protested in Philly Yesterday?
9 hours ago
THE ANSWER

About 5,500, according to official estimates. "The Monday figures marked a large increase from the protests at the Republican National Convention in Cleveland, where even the largest protests only drew a couple of hundred demonstrators. But it’s a far cry from the 35,000 to 50,000 that Philadelphia city officials initially expected."

Source:
NO BATTLEGROUND STATES LEAN TRUMP
NY Times’ Upshot Gives Clinton 68% Chance to Win
9 hours ago
THE LATEST

Only a day after FiveThirtyEight's Now Cast gave Donald Trump a 57% chance of winning, the New York Times' Upshot fires back with its own analysis that shows Hillary Clinton with a 68% chance to be the next president. Its model "calculates win probabilities for each state," which incorporate recent polls plus "a state's past election results and national polling." Notably, all of the battleground states that "vote like the country as a whole" either lean toward Clinton or are toss-ups. None lean toward Trump.

Source:
×