The Interior Department announced Thursday its long-awaited new rules for granting federal recognition to Native American tribes — but some lawmakers are already seeking changes.
Some members of Congress and officials on the state and local levels have been warily bracing for the proposed rules. Many have been worried about how far and wide they might open up new avenues for tribal casinos. They also are worried the rules might erode state tax bases and lead to new battles over historic lands.
The new rules by Secretary of the Interior Sally Jewell and Assistant Secretary-Indian Affairs Kevin Washburn would represent the reformation of a 35-year-old process by which the Interior officially recognizes Indian tribes.
The federal government already recognizes 566 tribes — but only 17 of those have been recognized under this 35-year-old process, which the proposal is seeking to revise.
And, in fact, the proposed changes announced Thursday keep and incorporate a key feature floated in a draft plan in June to provide recognition to a tribe that can show “community and political influence/authority from 1934 to the present,” rather than from as early as 1789 under existing rules.
The change would also eliminate the need for a petitioner to demonstrate that third parties identify them as a tribe from 1900 to the present.
Specifically, the rule change relates to the “Party 83 process” under Title 25 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Procedures for Establishing That an American Indian Group Exists as an Indian Tribe.
“President Obama believes that reforming the federal acknowledgment process will strengthen our important trust relationship with Indian tribes,” said Jewell in a statement.
But the fear from some lawmakers and state and local politicians was that the new language devised by the Bureau of Indian Affairs could result in federal recognition for literally hundreds of tribes that for years have struggled and failed to receive that status — and could give them all the privileges that come with such recognition.
Connecticut officials were among those who responded in a lukewarm way to Thursday’s announcement. In a joint statement, Connecticut Gov. Dannel Malloy, Attorney General George Jepsen, U.S. Sens. Richard Blumenthal and Chris Murphy, and Reps. Rosa DeLauro, John Larson, Joe Courtney, Jim Himes, and Elizabeth Etsy called the proposed revisions “a step in the right direction.”
“However, we believe additional changes and clarifications are necessary to ensure that Connecticut’s interests are protected, and we will continue to work for their inclusion,” they said.
The statement did not specify how they wanted it changed.
The Connecticut officials’ reaction comes amid concerns about its potential impact on the state’s current gambling agreement with the Mashantucket Pequot and Mohegan tribes — which are already operating casinos there — and could further erode the state’s tax base.
The Eastern Pequot of North Stonington, the Golden Hill Paugussett of Colchester and Trumbull, and the Schaghticoke of Kent are reported to be among the tribes in that state that have been fighting for years to get federal recognition.
Federal recognition establishes the U.S. government as the trustee for tribal lands and resources and makes tribal members and governments eligible for federal budget assistance and program services. In short, this means the federal authorities would protect their sovereign status, their lands and tribal property, and their rights as a dependent nation.
- 1 Trump Couldn’t Possibly Win—Except That He Probably Will
- 2 More Zika Money Is Coming, But Timing Remains Unclear
- 3 Clinton Goes After Walker, Rubio, Paul on Equal Pay
- 4 Why Did Lee Harvey Oswald Defect to the USSR Before He Killed the President?
- 5 Verizon’s AOL Deal Could Lead to New Privacy Problems
What We're Following See More »
Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.
Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”
Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."
In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-expected primary battle behind her, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton (D) is no longer going on the air in upcoming primary states. “Team Clinton hasn’t spent a single cent in … California, Indiana, Kentucky, Oregon and West Virginia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “campaign has spent a little more than $1 million in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone backer in the Senate, said the candidate should end his presidential campaign if he’s losing to Hillary Clinton after the primary season concludes in June, breaking sharply with the candidate who is vowing to take his insurgent bid to the party convention in Philadelphia.”
The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."