The Latest Battleground for Immigration Reform Lies Within the Military

A proposal to let dreamers enlist in the military, and get legal status, has stalled in Congress.

Rep. Jeff Denham (R-CA) joins a group of military 'DREAMers', undocumented youth who aspire to serve the United States in uniform but are prohibited from doing due to their immigration status, during a rally in front of the U.S. Captiol May 20, 2014 in Washington, DC. 
National Journal
Elahe Izadi
May 21, 2014, 3:41 a.m.

This is how dif­fi­cult it is to get any sort of im­mig­ra­tion-re­lated le­gis­la­tion through the GOP-con­trolled House: A Re­pub­lic­an-au­thored bill to al­low “dream­ers” to en­list in the mil­it­ary and also qual­i­fy for leg­al status is be­ing blocked.

Re­pub­lic­an Rep. Jeff Den­ham of Cali­for­nia has been lob­by­ing to get a vote on his pro­pos­al, the En­list Act, which is co­sponsored by 26 Demo­crats and 24 Re­pub­lic­ans, in­clud­ing Ma­jor­ity Whip Kev­in Mc­Carthy. On Tues­day, House Speak­er John Boehner said “there have been dis­cus­sions” but “no de­cisions” on wheth­er to al­low a stand-alone vote on the meas­ure.

Den­ham had ini­tially tried to get the pro­pos­al through via the Na­tion­al De­fense Au­thor­iz­a­tion Act, a must-pass de­fense bill. GOP lead­er­ship killed that idea Fri­day and on Tues­day night it was blocked in the House Rules Com­mit­tee from com­ing to the floor as an amend­ment to the bill.

“We have sup­por­ted it in the past, but try­ing to do this on the na­tion­al de­fense au­thor­iz­a­tion bill seems to us to be an in­ap­pro­pri­ate place to do it,” Boehner said earli­er in the day.

The le­gis­la­tion would al­low those who were brought to the U.S. il­leg­ally be­fore 2012 and were young­er than 15 at the time (known as “dream­ers”) to en­list in the mil­it­ary and gain per­man­ent leg­al status. Upon hon­or­able dis­charge, such ser­vice mem­bers would then be eli­gible to ap­ply for cit­izen­ship.

To drum up sup­port for the meas­ure, Den­ham, along with Re­pub­lic­an Rep. Mike Coff­man of Col­or­ado and Demo­crat­ic Reps. Lu­is Gu­ti­er­rez and Joa­quin Castro, held a press con­fer­ence Tues­day dur­ing which un­doc­u­mented youth dis­cusses their high grades, their ex­per­i­ence with mil­it­ary pro­grams like high school ROTC, and their de­sire to en­list in the mil­it­ary.

“My dream was, I’m go­ing to serve in the mil­it­ary,” said Ab­ra­ham Diaz, who was brought to the U.S. as a child by his fam­ily. “We want to serve our coun­try. This is has been our coun­try.”

And once again, while ad­voc­ates want Con­gress to pass im­mig­ra­tion-re­lated le­gis­la­tion, they are in­creas­ingly look­ing to the White House to step in and take ex­ec­ut­ive ac­tion. The Home­land Se­cur­ity De­part­ment is re­view­ing its de­port­a­tion policy and should an­nounce the res­ults of that re­view soon. The Pentagon is also weigh­ing a change to al­low some un­doc­u­mented im­mig­rants to en­list in the mil­it­ary, which would es­sen­tially mir­ror Den­ham’s pro­pos­al.

“The De­part­ment of De­fense has the abil­ity to do this today, and if the mil­it­ary takes the po­s­i­tion that they want the best and bright­est, and these men and wo­men meet the cri­ter­ia, then I think it’s something that the De­part­ment of De­fense is will­ing and able to do,” Den­ham said.

Den­ham, a vo­cal sup­port­er of com­pre­hens­ive im­mig­ra­tion re­form who rep­res­ents a dis­trict with a large His­pan­ic pop­u­la­tion, has faced fierce con­ser­vat­ive op­pos­i­tion on and off the Hill for his bill. Her­it­age Ac­tion pledged to key-vote the Na­tion­al De­fense Au­thor­iz­a­tion Act if it in­cluded lan­guage about dream­ers.

Con­ser­vat­ive Re­pub­lic­ans, who op­posed in­clud­ing the En­list Act in NDAA, cir­cu­lated a “Dear Col­league” let­ter, and said such a pro­vi­sion amoun­ted to am­nesty. House Armed Ser­vices Com­mit­tee Chair­man Buck McK­eon, a co­spon­sor of the En­list Act,  even­tu­ally pledged to not in­clude the pro­pos­al in the un­der­ly­ing bill text, for fear that it would be­come a pois­on pill.

Den­ham turned his ef­forts this month to get the bill through as an amend­ment on the de­fense bill, which would have forced law­makers to go on the re­cord about the pro­pos­al. The of­fice of Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Eric Can­tor shot that down on Fri­day. “No pro­posed EN­LIST amend­ments to NDAA will be made in or­der,” a Can­tor spokes­man had said in a state­ment.

Den­ham said he was sur­prised by that move. “The state­ment came from staff, so I’m still look­ing for a reas­on,” he said. 

Can­tor has pre­vi­ously echoed sup­port for a path to cit­izen­ship for dream­ers, but the “Kids Act” that would do just that hasn’t ma­ter­i­al­ized.

Dur­ing Tues­day’s Rules Com­mit­tee hear­ing, Den­ham in­sisted that the meas­ure was ger­mane to the de­bate around NDAA as a change to mil­it­ary code. He offered the bill as an amend­ment last year and it was ruled in or­der then, but he ended up with­draw­ing it when com­mit­tee jur­is­dic­tion­al is­sues arose. He pledged not to with­draw this time around.

“Not only is this an is­sue of na­tion­al se­cur­ity and mil­it­ary read­i­ness, but those kids who are here and have gone through our edu­ca­tion sys­tem, why wouldn’t we let the De­part­ment of De­fense to pick the best and bright­est?” Den­ham said. “I be­lieve in earned cit­izen­ship, but there’s no bet­ter way to show your pat­ri­ot­ism, your com­mit­ment, your sac­ri­fice, and the will­ing­ness to earn your cit­izen­ship than a will­ing­ness to serve in our mil­it­ary.”

Chan­ging im­mig­ra­tion policy to be­ne­fit dream­ers has be­come one of the few le­gis­lat­ive areas that in­spires strong bi­par­tis­an sup­port. Com­bine that with mil­it­ary ser­vice, and it would seem that get­ting sup­port for leg­al status shouldn’t be all that tough. After all, quite a few law­makers from both parties have signed onto Den­ham’s bill.

But this latest show­down un­der­scores the dif­fi­culties in the House to do pass any le­gis­la­tion re­lated to im­mig­ra­tion this year, par­tic­u­larly when it comes to al­low­ing a path to leg­al­iz­a­tion or cit­izen­ship.

What We're Following See More »
1.5 MILLION MORE TUNED IN FOR TRUMP
More People Watched Trump’s Acceptance Speech
13 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Hillary Clinton hopes that television ratings for the candidates' acceptance speeches at their respective conventions aren't foreshadowing of similar results at the polls in November. Preliminary results from the networks and cable channels show that 34.9 million people tuned in for Donald Trump's acceptance speech while 33.3 million watched Clinton accept the Democratic nomination. However, it is still possible that the numbers are closer than these ratings suggest: the numbers don't include ratings from PBS or CSPAN, which tend to attract more Democratic viewers.

Source:
×