House Democratic Leadership ‘Leaning Toward’ Playing Ball on Benghazi Select Committee

Democrats would appoint five members, but still think the committee is a sideshow.

WASHINGTON, DC - JANUARY 16: House Minority Leader Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) answers questions during her weekly news conference on Capitol Hill, January 16, 2014 in Washington, DC. Pelosi called on House Speaker John Boehner to cancel next week's recess until the House passes an extension of unemployment insurance.
National Journal
Elahe Izadi
May 21, 2014, 7:32 a.m.

After weeks of de­bate with­in party ranks wheth­er to par­ti­cip­ate, House Demo­crat­ic Lead­er Nancy Pelosi is now lean­ing to­ward ap­point­ing mem­bers of her con­fer­ence to the Benghazi Se­lect Com­mit­tee.

Pelosi met with mem­bers of House Demo­crat­ic lead­er­ship this morn­ing and will likely hold an­oth­er meet­ing this af­ter­noon to up­date them on ne­go­ti­ations between her and House Speak­er John Boehner. “No de­cision has been made, but Pelosi is now lean­ing to­ward ap­point­ing a full com­ple­ment of mem­bers,” says a seni­or Demo­crat­ic aide.

The pan­el has slots for sev­en Re­pub­lic­ans, who were ap­poin­ted last week, and five Demo­crats. Demo­crat­ic lead­ers had lob­bied for an even split, but when it be­came clear that wasn’t go­ing to hap­pen, they pressed Re­pub­lic­ans to en­sure equal rep­res­ent­a­tion on vari­ous is­sues, such as sub­poen­as and the right to be present and par­ti­cip­ate in the de­pos­ition of wit­nesses.

Pelosi and Boehner met Tues­day af­ter­noon. “We have offered as­sur­ances on com­mit­tee pro­ced­ures, but no sub­stant­ive changes that could hurt the in­vest­ig­a­tion,” says a House GOP lead­er­ship aide.

That may re­main a stick­ing point for Demo­crats, par­tic­u­larly when it comes to the de­pos­ition of wit­nesses; Demo­crats have in­sisted that they want the right, not just the as­sur­ance, that they can be present and par­ti­cip­ate.

Pelosi and Boehner met Tues­day af­ter­noon. “We have offered as­sur­ances on com­mit­tee pro­ced­ures, but no sub­stant­ive changes that could hurt the in­vest­ig­a­tion,” says a House GOP lead­er­ship aide.

That may re­main a stick­ing point for Demo­crats, par­tic­u­larly when it comes to the de­pos­ition of wit­nesses. Demo­crats have in­sisted that they want the right, not just the as­sur­ance, that they can be present and par­ti­cip­ate.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
6 hours ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
6 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
6 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
6 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
7 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×