GOP Senator Hunts for Info on Elephant-Poaching

Louisiana’s David Vitter asks U.S. agency whether foreign government officials are involved.

It's a good week to be a Republican.
National Journal
Billy House
May 13, 2014, 11:10 a.m.

Sen. Dav­id Vit­ter is ask­ing U.S. con­ser­va­tion of­fi­cials wheth­er they have evid­ence link­ing gov­ern­ment of­fi­cials from United Ar­ab Emir­ates or oth­er Middle East­ern coun­tries to the il­leg­al poach­ing of Afric­an ele­phants — and the ex­tent of bribery or oth­er pub­lic cor­rup­tion in­volved.

In a let­ter to the head of the Fish and Wild­life Ser­vice, Dan Ashe, the Louisi­ana Re­pub­lic­an ex­plains that he is search­ing for a “bet­ter un­der­stand­ing” of the situ­ation on the ground in Zi­m­b­ab­we and Tan­zania — and what ex­actly the U.S. gov­ern­ment is do­ing to as­sist pro­tec­tion of the Afric­an ele­phant in those coun­tries.

Vit­ter, the rank­ing mem­ber on the Sen­ate En­vir­on­ment and Pub­lic Works Com­mit­tee, has of­ten joined oth­er con­ser­vat­ives in char­ging that the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion uses the En­dangered Spe­cies Act to — in his words — stomp on the prop­erty rights of Amer­ic­ans.

At the same time, Vit­ter has in­sisted that he strongly sup­ports pro­tect­ing en­dangered spe­cies and fra­gile eco­sys­tems. In the plight of Afric­an ele­phants, he has found a cause.

A Vit­ter spokes­man, Luke Bolar, ex­plained Tues­day that the sen­at­or’s in­quiry about activ­it­ies of for­eign-gov­ern­ment of­fi­cials res­ults from “some things that have been brought to the sen­at­or’s at­ten­tion” and that he is “just try­ing to get more de­tails.” The Fish and Wild­life Ser­vice has not yet re­spon­ded to his let­ter, dated Monday.

Ele­phant-poach­ing, much of it car­ried out by or­gan­ized crim­in­al gangs tied to the il­leg­al ivory trade, has ris­en sharply in Africa in re­cent years. In Tan­zania, for in­stance, the slaughter has reached such alarm­ing rates that its ele­phant pop­u­la­tion could be wiped out in sev­en years, con­ser­va­tion ex­perts told a United Na­tions con­fer­ence as re­cently as last week.

“There is ab­so­lutely no ques­tion about the dev­ast­a­tion that il­leg­al poach­ing is caus­ing some of our most icon­ic spe­cies,” Vit­ter told Ashe. “It is im­per­at­ive that we find the best means for­ward to pre­vent il­leg­al poach­ing in Africa and to mit­ig­ate ad­di­tion­al threats to the sur­viv­al of the ele­phant.”

Vit­ter re­ques­ted in­form­a­tion on what the U.S. knows about wheth­er “bribery or oth­er in­ap­pro­pri­ate fin­an­cial trans­ac­tions” are en­cour­aging poach­ing, wheth­er Middle East­ern in­vestors are in­volved, and wheth­er there are any “for­eign ad­vert­ising cam­paigns” that pro­mote poach­ing of pro­tec­ted or en­dangered spe­cies, in­clud­ing the Afric­an ele­phant, from Zi­m­b­ab­we or Tan­zania.

“Giv­en the re­search you have done in re­gards to glob­al cor­rup­tion on these is­sues, have you dis­covered or ac­quired evid­ence that gov­ern­ment of­fi­cials with­in the United Ar­ab Emir­ates or oth­er Middle East­ern gov­ern­ments have been in­volved in ef­forts to har­vest Afric­an ele­phants in large num­bers that are un­sus­tain­able?” Vit­ter asked.

Vit­ter’s let­ter fol­lows an April 4 an­nounce­ment by Fish and Wild­life that it was sus­pend­ing im­ports of sports-hunted Afric­an ele­phant trophies taken dur­ing 2014 from Zi­m­b­ab­we and Tan­zania. “Ques­tion­able man­age­ment prac­tices, a lack of ef­fect­ive law en­force­ment and weak gov­ernance have res­ul­ted in un­con­trolled poach­ing and cata­stroph­ic pop­u­la­tion de­clines of Afric­an ele­phants in Tan­zania,” the agency said.

“In Zi­m­b­ab­we, avail­able data, though lim­ited, in­dic­ate a sig­ni­fic­ant de­cline in the ele­phant pop­u­la­tion. An­ec­dot­al evid­ence, such as the widely pub­li­cized pois­on­ing last year of 300 ele­phants in Hwange Na­tion­al Park, sug­gests that Zi­m­b­ab­we’s ele­phants are also un­der siege,” the an­nounce­ment said.

“Ad­di­tion­al killing of ele­phants in these coun­tries, even if leg­al, is not sus­tain­able and is not cur­rently sup­port­ing con­ser­va­tion ef­forts that con­trib­ute to­wards the re­cov­ery of the spe­cies,” the an­nounce­ment said.

MOST READ
What We're Following See More »
1.5 MILLION MORE TUNED IN FOR TRUMP
More People Watched Trump’s Acceptance Speech
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

Hillary Clinton hopes that television ratings for the candidates' acceptance speeches at their respective conventions aren't foreshadowing of similar results at the polls in November. Preliminary results from the networks and cable channels show that 34.9 million people tuned in for Donald Trump's acceptance speech while 33.3 million watched Clinton accept the Democratic nomination. However, it is still possible that the numbers are closer than these ratings suggest: the numbers don't include ratings from PBS or CSPAN, which tend to attract more Democratic viewers.

Source:
×