This week, the Tennessee General Assembly repealed the state’s long-standing ban on switchblades, or, as their purveyors like to call them “automatic knives.” It was one more victory for the nascent knife-rights movement, a push to legalize deadly blades that’s occurring mostly out of the mainstream eye.
The bill also does away with a limit on the length of a knife — as well as preempts any city or town ordinance that regulates knives. It passed both houses overwhelmingly and likely will be signed into law by the state’s Republican governor, Bill Haslam. (So watch yourself the next time you anger someone in a Nashville honky-tonk.)
If you didn’t know that Tennessee, or any state for that matter, banned switchblades, or that they’re now dubbed “automatic” weapons because they can be triggered with one hand by a single button on the handle, that suits the knife-rights movement just fine. They’ve operated a largely under-the-radar campaign in friendly red states to open up the landscape to more exotic bladed instruments.
The similarity to the gun lobby isn’t accidental. The most influential organization dedicated to knife rights is patterned after the National Rifle Association, although it doesn’t nearly have that group’s legislative firepower. But the movement is also a recognition that, as gun advocates score victory after victory at the state level (the Georgia Legislature this week passed a bill that would allow guns to be carried in bars, schools, churches, and airports), the political environment has never been better for loosening similar restrictions on knives.
“We are really rewriting knife law in America,” says Doug Ritter, the chairman of Knife Rights.
Ritter, an Arizona journalist and outdoorsman, founded Knife Rights in 2006 after he was riled by an article in The Wall Street Journal that he felt unfairly stigmatized knives as a societal threat. “I basically had an epiphany,” Ritter said. “There was not an NRA for knife owners.”
Knives, especially switchblades, are in fact heavily regulated in many states and on the federal level with the Federal Switchblade Act, which bans the introduction of those “automatic” blades into interstate commerce. The federal act was passed in 1958, at the height of public fears over street toughs and juvenile delinquency, as epitomized by movies such as The Wild One and Rebel Without a Cause and musicals such as West Side Story.
The movement, Ritter says, came of age in 2009 when it beat back an attempt by the U.S. Customs Service to expand the definition of what constitutes a switchblade for importation purposes to include so-called tactical knives, small blades that can be opened with one hand, but that lack the triggering mechanism of switchblades. “Eighty percent of the knives sold in the U.S. could have been illegal,” Ritter says.
The following year brought the push to pass “preemption” laws at the state level, laws that would supersede local ordinances regulating knives, as well as laws that would legalize the sale of switchblades within state lines. The effort brought successes in states such as Alaska, Kansas, and Indiana. Ritter’s group also helped defeat a bid by Nevada to ban knives longer than 2 inches.
“Counting Tennessee, we’ve passed 13 bills in 11 states in four years,” Ritter says. “That’s a pretty admirable record.”
The group has also filed a civil-rights suit against New York City over its efforts to regulate folding pocketknives as “gravity knives.” On the federal level, it helped spur a bill sponsored last year by Rep. Matt Salmon, R-Ariz., Ritter’s congressman, that would allow owners of “automatic knives” to transport them from one state to another ithout violating federal law.
As with the NRA’s lobbying efforts, much of the justification for deregulation is rooted in the Founders’ and modern concepts of self-defense. Last fall, David Kopel, a well-known gun-rights advocate and Second Amendment scholar, released what was termed the first modern analysis of whether the Constitution protects knives along with guns. (It also may have been the first law-review article to quote the movie Crocodile Dundee.)
The conservative argument? The amendment refers simply to “arms,” not just firearms, and knives are “arms.” And also, just what do you think was on the end of those Revolutionary War-era muskets?
Ritter freely concedes that, for now, his organization, which employs just one state-level lobbyist, has confined its legislative efforts to GOP-dominated states where they’re likely to receive a warm reception, but the idea, he says, is to build momentum for forays into more hostile territory. It helps that there’s no organized opposition, no Brady Campaign for knives, no “knife control” movement. Liberal pundit Al Sharpton drew some conservative ire last year when he suggested regulating knives along with guns — but for the most part, progressives have been silent on the issue.
Once there’s enough grassroots momentum at the state level, Ritter says, the goal will be to repeal the federal switchblade act. “It’s a lot easier than to go to Congress and say, ‘Why does this anachronism exist?’ ” he says. “The gangs from West Side Story are all dead!”
What We're Following See More »
The great restroom war of 2016 continues apace, as eleven states have sued the Obama administration in federal court, claiming its federal guidance on how schools should accommodate transgender students "has no basis in law." "The lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas on behalf of Alabama, Arizona, Georgia, Louisiana, Maine, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, West Virginia and Wisconsin. The lawsuit argues that the federal government has worked to turn workplaces and schools 'into laboratories for a massive social experiment.'"
By a 29-10 vote, the House Natural Resources Committee today passed the bill to allow Puerto Rico to restructure its $70 billion in debt. The legislation "would establish an oversight board to help the commonwealth restructure its un-payable debt and craft an economic recovery plan."
"Though every major party nominee since 1976 has released his tax returns while running for president, the practice has never been required by law. Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR) wants to change that. The senior Democrat on the Senate Finance Committee, which handles tax issues, introduced a bill on Wednesday that would force presidential candidates to release their most recent tax returns. The Presidential Tax Transparency Act, as the bill is called, would require candidates to make their latest three years of tax returns public no later than 15 days after becoming the nominee."