Democrats Will Try to Force a Vote on Immigration Reform. Here’s Why It Matters.

The effort will likely go nowhere procedurally, but lawmakers want to keep the pressure on Republicans.

A boys shows a US flag as President Barack Obama speaks on immigration at the Chamizal National Memorial on May 10, 2011 in El Paso, Texas.
National Journal
Elahe Izadi
See more stories about...
Elahe Izadi
March 26, 2014, 2:31 a.m.

Just last month, Cap­it­ol Hill Demo­crats — very pur­pose­fully — gave Re­pub­lic­ans plenty of space to have an in­tern­al dis­cus­sion over im­mig­ra­tion re­form. Not any­more. 

With the pro­spects of passing com­pre­hens­ive re­form this year not look­ing very good, Demo­crats want to kick the pres­sure up a notch on their Re­pub­lic­an coun­ter­parts. Demo­crats will file a dis­charge pe­ti­tion Wed­nes­day in an at­tempt to force a vote on the House ver­sion of the com­pre­hens­ive im­mig­ra­tion re­form bill that passed the Sen­ate last sum­mer.

That ef­fort will likely go nowhere pro­ced­ur­ally, but ad­voc­ates view the mech­an­ism as a push to Re­pub­lic­an lead­er­ship and as a chance to get law­makers on the re­cord.

“It’s time for our Re­pub­lic­an lead­er­ship in the House to give us a vote,” said House Demo­crat­ic Caucus Chair­man Xavi­er Be­cerra. “Stop block­ing a vote, let us have a path to fix our broken im­mig­ra­tion sys­tem.”

House Minor­ity Lead­er Nancy Pelosi’s of­fice on Tues­day high­lighted a new Con­gres­sion­al Budget Of­fice es­tim­ate that the House ver­sion of the com­pre­hens­ive bill that passed the Sen­ate would re­duce the de­fi­cit by $200 bil­lion over 10 years. (That’s no big sur­prise, giv­en that CBO found the Sen­ate bill would also re­duce the de­fi­cit.)

Im­mig­ra­tion act­iv­ists have already taken up ag­gress­ive tac­tics, such as con­front­ing House Speak­er John Boehner dur­ing his break­fast and storm­ing House Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Eric Can­tor’s Ar­ling­ton, Va., condo. But back when House Re­pub­lic­ans un­veiled their im­mig­ra­tion prin­ciples last month, Demo­crats re­mained tep­id so that Re­pub­lic­ans could try and push im­mig­ra­tion re­form among their own mem­bers. Since then, Re­pub­lic­ans have down­played re­form mov­ing ahead — des­pite Boehner still say­ing it’s im­port­ant that it hap­pen.

Now, Pres­id­ent Obama is reach­ing out to mem­bers of Con­gress and act­iv­ists who have been call­ing on his ad­min­is­tra­tion to curb de­port­a­tions. Home­land Se­cur­ity Sec­ret­ary Jeh John­son met with Demo­crat­ic Rep. Lu­is Gu­ti­er­rez for the first time Tues­day. While po­ten­tial changes to de­port­a­tion en­force­ment were not dis­cussed, John­son has been dir­ec­ted to re­view his agency’s ap­proach.

“It is clear to me they are pre­par­ing for the worst-case scen­ario if the Re­pub­lic­ans don’t act,” Gu­ti­er­rez said.

This dis­charge pe­ti­tion stands little chance of ac­tu­ally for­cing a vote. Even the Re­pub­lic­ans who have signed on as co­spon­sors of the com­pre­hens­ive im­mig­ra­tion bill aren’t en­dors­ing it. Rep. Ileana Ros-Le­htin­en of Flor­ida, one of just three Re­pub­lic­ans who have ac­tu­ally signed onto the House im­mig­ra­tion bill, says she won’t be sign­ing the dis­charge pe­ti­tion as a mat­ter of prin­ciple. But she’s not speak­ing out against the ef­fort, either.

“I don’t blame them for us­ing it. I think it’s good, a power­ful tool,” she said. “For every is­sue, you use every vehicle avail­able to you.”

Demo­crats are call­ing on the pub­lic to sup­port the dis­charge pe­ti­tion, and out­side or­gan­iz­a­tions will be util­iz­ing it in their ad­vocacy.

“That’s much bet­ter from an or­gan­iz­ing per­spect­ive,” Jeff Haus­er of the AFL-CIO said of sign­ing the pe­ti­tion. “Those work­ing with im­mig­rant com­munit­ies, it al­lows us to know who are our friends and who are our en­emies.”

What We're Following See More »
‘PRESUMPTIVE NOMINEE’
Priebus Asks Party to Unite Behind Trump
2 hours ago
THE LATEST
FEELING THE MIDWESTERN BERN
Sanders Upsets Clinton in Indiana
3 hours ago
THE LATEST

Despite trailing Hillary Clinton by a significant margin, Bernie Sanders wasn't going the way of Ted Cruz tonight. The Vermont senator upset Clinton in Indiana, with MSNBC calling the race at 9pm. Sanders appears poised to win by a five- or six-point spread.

Source:
TRUMP IS PRESUMPTIVE NOMINEE
Ted Cruz Bows Out, Effectively Ceding the Contest to Trump
3 hours ago
THE LATEST

And just like that, it's over. Ted Cruz will suspend his presidential campaign after losing badly to Donald Trump in Indiana tonight. "While Cruz had always hedged when asked whether he would quit if he lost Indiana; his campaign had laid a huge bet on the state." John Kasich's campaign has pledged to carry on. “From the beginning, I’ve said that I would continue on as long as there was a viable path to victory,” said Cruz. “Tonight, I’m sorry to say it appears that path has been foreclosed."

Source:
TAKES AT LEAST 45 DELEGATES
Trump Wins Indiana, All but Seals the Nomination
3 hours ago
THE LATEST

The Republican establishment's last remaining hope—a contested convention this summer—may have just ended in Indiana, as Donald Trump won a decisive victory over Ted Cruz. Nothing Cruz seemed to have in his corner seemed to help—not a presumptive VP pick in Carly Fiorina, not a midwestern state where he's done well in the past, and not the state's legions of conservatives. Though Trump "won't secure the 1,237 delegates he needs to formally claim the nomination until June, his Indiana triumph makes it almost impossible to stop him. Following his decisive wins in New York and other East Coast states, the Indiana victory could put Trump within 200 delegates of the magic number he needs to clinch the nomination." Cruz, meanwhile, "now faces the agonizing choice of whether to remain in the race, with his attempt to force the party into a contested convention in tatters, or to bow out and cede the party nomination to his political nemesis." The Associated Press, which called the race at 7pm, predicts Trump will win at least 45 delegates.

Source:
LOTS OF STRINGERS
Inside the AP’s Election Operation
8 hours ago
WHY WE CARE
×