Congress Has Theories About What Happened to the Missing Malaysia Airlines Plane

Rep. Michael McCaul suggests that the plane may have landed and could now be used as a bomb.

Colonel Do Duc Minh (2st L), Vietnam Air Force's 370 Division's Chief of Staff, points at a map as he speaks to reporters about search flights aimed at finding the missing Malaysia Airlines plane at Tan Son Nhat airport in Ho Chi Minh city on March 15, 2014. Do Duc Minh said Vietnam continues their search flights while widening the search areas close to air spaces under control of Thailand and Singapore.
National Journal
Sarah Mimms
See more stories about...
Sarah Mimms
March 18, 2014, 1 a.m.

Ten days after Malay­sia Air­lines Flight 370 dis­ap­peared, seem­ingly in­to thin air, au­thor­it­ies are no more cer­tain about what happened to the plane and its 239 pas­sen­gers and crew mem­bers than they were when the flight went miss­ing on March 8.

As the search con­tin­ues, mem­bers of Con­gress ad­mit that they know al­most noth­ing about what happened to the miss­ing flight. Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y., who chairs the Home­land Se­cur­ity Sub­com­mit­tee on Coun­terter­ror­ism and In­tel­li­gence, blames a lack of co­oper­a­tion from the Malay­si­an gov­ern­ment for the slow pace of the in­vest­ig­a­tions.

In an in­form­a­tion va­cu­um, the­or­ies are fly­ing around the halls of the Cap­it­ol:

THE PLANE LANDED AND COULD BE USED AS A WEAPON.

Rep. Mi­chael Mc­Caul, R-Texas, who chairs the House Home­land Se­cur­ity Com­mit­tee, floated this the­ory on Fox News Sunday, ar­guing that the plane may have ac­tu­ally landed and could be used by ter­ror­ist groups.

Mc­Caul said that there are three op­tions: Either the plane landed in the ocean, it flew north to­wards Pakistan and Kaza­kh­stan (un­likely, he says, be­cause it would have been picked up by radar), or it flew south to­wards In­done­sia and Aus­tralia. That lat­ter op­tion, Mc­Caul warned, could have some dam­aging re­per­cus­sions.

If it landed in a coun­try such as In­done­sia, he said, “it could be used later on as a cruise mis­sile, as the 9/11 hi­jack­ers did. That’s something we have to use our ima­gin­a­tion in these situ­ations.”

Mc­Caul elab­or­ated in an­oth­er ap­pear­ance on Fox News on Monday, not­ing that “we’re look­ing at” the use of the plane as a po­ten­tial weapon as one the­ory. “What would be the pur­pose be­hind crash­ing it in­to the ocean? “¦ [I]t could have landed some­where, filled with ex­plos­ives and then sent some­where else to cause some great dam­age.”

Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, hasn’t put out a the­ory about the plane crash, but he did tweet out a link to this NPR story look­ing at pos­sible run­ways that the flight could have used if it in­deed landed.

… OR MAYBE NOT.

Rep. Mike Ro­gers, R-Mich., who also sits on the Home­land Se­cur­ity Com­mit­tee told Fox News Sunday: “This plane still may be at the bot­tom of the In­di­an Ocean, and I think a lot of folks that I talk to be­lieve that’s prob­ably the most likely, the most prob­able cir­cum­stances — is that in fact it is at the bot­tom of the In­di­an Ocean. But you can­not quite yet rule out everything else be­cause we don’t have the phys­ic­al evid­ence we need to come to that con­clu­sion.”

THE PI­LOTS WERE IN­VOLVED.

For all the talk of the two pas­sen­gers who boarded the flight with stolen pass­ports, many mem­bers of Con­gress worry that not enough at­ten­tion has been paid to pi­lot Za­harie Ahmad Shah and co­pi­lot Fariq Ab­dul Ham­id. Those con­cerns have only grown since it was re­vealed that the plane’s transpon­der — which al­lows it to com­mu­nic­ate with air traffic con­trol — was turned off.

“There’s ob­vi­ously something with the pi­lot and the co­pi­lot, and that has to be drilled down on. “¦ This right now has to fo­cus on the pi­lot and the co­pi­lot,” King said Sunday on ABC’s This Week.

Ro­gers, mean­while, has honed in spe­cific­ally on the flight sim­u­lat­or found at the pi­lot’s home. On its own, the sim­u­lat­or may not be sus­pi­cious, but the former FBI agent warns that it could have been used for pre-plan­ning.

“Think about it. If you’re go­ing to fly over coun­tries that we know have radar and you’re go­ing to try to do it in a way that either saves the air­craft or crashes the air­craft, there is a lot of plan­ning that has to hap­pen,” Ro­gers said on Fox News Sunday.

Mc­Caul agrees that the in­vest­ig­a­tion needs to fo­cus on the cock­pit. “I think from all the in­form­a­tion I’ve been briefed on from, you know, high levels with­in Home­land Se­cur­ity, Na­tion­al Coun­terter­ror­ism Cen­ter, in­tel­li­gence com­munity, that something was go­ing on with the pi­lot. I think this all leads to­wards the cock­pit, with the pi­lot him­self, and co­pi­lot,” Mc­Caul said on Fox News Sunday.

CHINA KNOWS SOMETHING.

King, in par­tic­u­lar, is sus­pi­cious of the Chinese gov­ern­ment, which took days to re­lease pho­tos of what they be­lieve to be the rem­nants of the flight. The New York Re­pub­lic­an also spec­u­lates that the pho­tos may have been doctored in the in­ter­im.

” “¦ [A]ll I can think about that is that the Chinese may not want us to know how soph­ist­ic­ated their sys­tem is and they may have ac­tu­ally dumbed down some of those pho­tos be­fore they put them out,” King said on CNN’s New Day last week.

“Al­most half the plane was Chinese cit­izens, and you would think that at a time like this, in­ter­na­tion­al crises, the Chinese would’ve come for­ward. But maybe they thought that the im­ages they would show would be — you know, show a level of soph­ist­ic­a­tion bey­ond what we think they have,” he ad­ded.

The Malay­si­an gov­ern­ment could also be hid­ing something, King has spec­u­lated, ar­guing that the na­tion took nine days after the crash to search the pi­lot’s and co­pi­lot’s homes. But that isn’t the only piece of in­form­a­tion that the Malay­si­an gov­ern­ment has kept close to the vest.

“If the Malay­si­an Air Force thought back on Sat­urday that the plane pos­sibly had de­toured or turned around, why did they wait un­til just the oth­er day to tell us that?” King asked on CNN Thursday.

FAKE PASS­PORTS, TER­ROR­ISM MAY BE RED HER­RINGS.

Though ter­ror­ism and the two pas­sen­gers with stolen pass­ports were im­me­di­ate con­cerns in the af­ter­math of the plane’s dis­ap­pear­ance, King notes that so far no con­nec­tion has been made.

“No, there’s been no ter­ror­ist con­nec­tions what­so­ever,” King said on This Week. “There’s been no ter­ror­ist chat­ter. There’s noth­ing out there in­dic­at­ing it’s ter­ror­ists. Doesn’t mean it’s not, but so far noth­ing has been picked up by the in­tel­li­gence com­munity from Day One. I still have ques­tions about the two Ir­a­ni­ans who were on the plane, but again, that could be a side is­sue. The fact is noth­ing has come up in­dic­at­ing a ter­ror­ist nex­us.”

Mc­Caul con­curred. “We don’t have any evid­ence that this is ter­ror­ist-re­lated, al­though you can’t rule that out,” he said.

The grow­ing ru­mors among mem­bers of Con­gress most keyed-in on se­cur­ity is­sues are just fur­ther evid­ence that des­pite the work of 25 coun­tries to find the plane, whatever happened to Malay­sia Air­lines Flight 370 re­mains an ut­ter mys­tery.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
30 minutes ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
30 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
30 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
30 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
1 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×