For Darrell Issa and Elijah Cummings, Sorry Is the Hardest Word

Both congressmen are asking for an apology after an explosive disagreement at a Wednesday morning hearing. But it may be too late to apologize.

House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Darrell Issa gets up to leave as ranking member U.S. Rep. Elijah Cummings continues to speak after Issa adjourned the hearing in the Rayburn House Office Building March 5, 2014 in Washington, DC.
National Journal
Sarah Mimms
March 5, 2014, 12:04 p.m.

House Over­sight and Gov­ern­ment Re­form Com­mit­tee Chair­man Dar­rell Issa and rank­ing mem­ber Eli­jah Cum­mings don’t ex­actly get along well, as was ap­par­ent dur­ing a Wed­nes­day morn­ing hear­ing: Cum­mings began a lengthy speech de­noun­cing the chair’s in­vest­ig­at­ive tac­tics while Issa held down the mute but­ton on Cum­mings’s mi­cro­phone.

Both are call­ing for an apo­logy fol­low­ing the out­burst, and Issa, in true House Over­sight Com­mit­tee form, is call­ing on his Demo­crat­ic col­leagues to launch a kind of in­vest­ig­a­tion.

“He owes me an apo­logy,” Issa said Wed­nes­day af­ter­noon. “I think he should be dealt with by his lead­er­ship. You know the con­duct of the House…. We’d dis­missed the only wit­ness and his con­duct was in­ap­pro­pri­ate and rather shock­ing.”

The in­cid­ent began fol­low­ing a very brief Over­sight hear­ing with former IRS of­fi­cial Lois Lern­er, which ended ab­ruptly after Lern­er in­voked her Fifth Amend­ment right. Issa of­fi­cially ad­journed the hear­ing, but not be­fore Cum­mings took to the mic.

“Mr. Chair­man you can­not run a com­mit­tee like this “¦ we are bet­ter than that as a coun­try, we are bet­ter than that as a com­mit­tee, I have asked for a few minutes to ask — ” Cum­mings said be­fore Issa cut his mi­cro­phone.

“We’re ad­journed, close it down,” Issa said, as Cum­mings began shout­ing in­to the dead mi­cro­phone. After a minute, Issa just got up and left. (Watch the video of the full ex­change here.)

Issa isn’t sure ex­actly where Cum­mings’s at­tack came from. “We talked about it be­fore the hear­ing. He asked would there be open­ing state­ments? I said no, there wouldn’t be, we’d already opened in May. And he un­der­stood that,” Issa ex­plained later Wed­nes­day. “And then he asked if he could ask a ques­tion after ad­journ­ment. I said, ‘What is your ques­tion?’ and he went in­to ef­fect­ively an open­ing state­ment ac­cus­ing me of hav­ing all the hear­ings based on false premise. And so then — we’d already ad­journed, I simply walked away.”

For his part, Cum­mings says Issa should be the one to say he’s sorry. He and the oth­er 16 Demo­crat­ic mem­bers of the Over­sight Com­mit­tee penned a let­ter to Issa Wed­nes­day, ask­ing for an apo­logy. “We be­lieve your ac­tions today were dis­respect­ful and ab­us­ive, and they im­pugn the in­teg­rity of this Com­mit­tee and un­der­mine the cred­ib­il­ity of its work. They also make it ap­pear that the Com­mit­tee is more con­cerned with polit­ic­al spec­tacle than gath­er­ing facts in a bal­anced and im­par­tial man­ner,” they wrote.

For now, Demo­crat­ic lead­er­ship seems to be stick­ing by their man. “The be­ha­vi­or dis­played today by Chair­man Issa dur­ing the Over­sight and Gov­ern­ment re­form hear­ing was un­ac­cept­able and de­plor­able,” Minor­ity Whip Steny Hoy­er said in a state­ment to Na­tion­al Journ­al. “This is not how our demo­cracy works and it’s not the way to provide re­spons­ible gov­ern­ment over­sight. Rank­ing Mem­ber Cum­mings and Demo­crats should have the op­por­tun­ity to be heard. If any­one de­serves an apo­logy, Mr. Cum­mings does.”

Hoy­er also tweeted his sup­port for the rank­ing mem­ber Wed­nes­day morn­ing.

Up­dated: Wed­nes­day at 5:50 p.m. with com­ments from Hoy­er.

MOST READ
What We're Following See More »
IN ADDITION TO DNC AND DCCC
Clinton Campaign Also Hacked
10 hours ago
THE LATEST
1.5 MILLION MORE TUNED IN FOR TRUMP
More People Watched Trump’s Acceptance Speech
10 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Hillary Clinton hopes that television ratings for the candidates' acceptance speeches at their respective conventions aren't foreshadowing of similar results at the polls in November. Preliminary results from the networks and cable channels show that 34.9 million people tuned in for Donald Trump's acceptance speech while 33.3 million watched Clinton accept the Democratic nomination. However, it is still possible that the numbers are closer than these ratings suggest: the numbers don't include ratings from PBS or CSPAN, which tend to attract more Democratic viewers.

Source:
×