Cut to GDP Growth Doesn’t Necessarily Spell Trouble for Economy

Take out the shutdown and tough weather, and you’ve got slow but not terrible growth.

Dome buried in snow
National Journal
Catherine Hollander
See more stories about...
Catherine Hollander
Feb. 28, 2014, 5:04 a.m.

Last sum­mer, the U.S. eco­nomy seemed like it was just start­ing to hum along. The gov­ern­ment re­por­ted growth of 4.1 per­cent in the third quarter, the fast­est it had been since 2011. Then, the fourth quarter came along, bring­ing with it a gov­ern­ment shut­down and the start of snow, and the eco­nomy’s growth slowed by nearly 2 per­cent­age points — drop­ping to 2.4 per­cent, ac­cord­ing to the latest es­tim­ate from the Bur­eau of Eco­nom­ic Ana­lys­is.

Time to worry? Not yet. BEA’s lower growth es­tim­ate came as no sur­prise to eco­nom­ists. When you con­sider what the eco­nomy went through in the fi­nal three months of the year, some eco­nom­ists ar­gue its per­form­ance wasn’t so shabby.

“While 2.4% is fairly slug­gish, it was des­pite more ad­verse than usu­al weath­er at the end of the quarter and the gov­ern­ment shut­down at the start,” Jim O’Sul­li­van, chief U.S. eco­nom­ist at High Fre­quency Eco­nom­ics, said in a note to cli­ents after the re­port’s re­lease.

BEA’s re­vi­sion re­flects cuts in con­sumer spend­ing, lower in­vent­ory in­vest­ment, few­er ex­ports, and less state and loc­al gov­ern­ment spend­ing than ini­tially thought.

The 16-day par­tial gov­ern­ment shut­down is still be­lieved to have sub­trac­ted 0.3 per­cent­age points from growth, a spokes­wo­man for the Bur­eau of Eco­nom­ic Ana­lys­is con­firmed Fri­day. The bur­eau doesn’t spe­cific­ally break out weath­er ef­fects on the eco­nomy un­less there are cata­stroph­ic events, she said, but eco­nom­ists widely see the tough winter weath­er in Decem­ber, Janu­ary, and Feb­ru­ary as hav­ing con­trib­uted to the spate of soft data that have been re­leased re­cently.

“Part of [the re­cent] soft­ness may re­flect ad­verse weath­er con­di­tions, but at this point it’s dif­fi­cult to dis­cern ex­actly how much,” Fed­er­al Re­serve Chair Janet Yel­len told mem­bers of the Sen­ate Bank­ing Com­mit­tee on Thursday. “In the weeks and months ahead, my col­leagues and I will be at­tend­ant to sig­nals to in­dic­ate wheth­er the re­cov­ery is pro­gress­ing in line with our earli­er ex­pect­a­tions.”

Add back the 0.3 per­cent­age points from the gov­ern­ment shut­down and a little bit more from the weath­er’s drag, and the re­cov­ery seems to be pro­gress­ing as ex­pec­ted, said Robert Dye, chief eco­nom­ist of Comer­ica Bank. “This is not a 4 or 5 per­cent [growth] eco­nomy, it’s a maybe something in the or­der of 2.5 to 3 per­cent eco­nomy, so that’s not a bad num­ber,” Dye said of Fri­day’s re­vi­sion.

Eco­nom­ists don’t ex­pect much of a pickup in the first quarter, thanks to that bad weath­er and those weak data read­ings, but many re­main hope­ful that growth in 2014 is likely to beat out the 1.9 per­cent growth of last year.

The Bur­eau of Eco­nom­ic Ana­lys­is will re­lease an ad­di­tion­al up­date on fourth-quarter growth on March 27.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
6 hours ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
6 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
6 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
6 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
7 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×