Cut to GDP Growth Doesn’t Necessarily Spell Trouble for Economy

Take out the shutdown and tough weather, and you’ve got slow but not terrible growth.

Dome buried in snow
National Journal
Catherine Hollander
See more stories about...
Catherine Hollander
Feb. 28, 2014, 5:04 a.m.

Last sum­mer, the U.S. eco­nomy seemed like it was just start­ing to hum along. The gov­ern­ment re­por­ted growth of 4.1 per­cent in the third quarter, the fast­est it had been since 2011. Then, the fourth quarter came along, bring­ing with it a gov­ern­ment shut­down and the start of snow, and the eco­nomy’s growth slowed by nearly 2 per­cent­age points — drop­ping to 2.4 per­cent, ac­cord­ing to the latest es­tim­ate from the Bur­eau of Eco­nom­ic Ana­lys­is.

Time to worry? Not yet. BEA’s lower growth es­tim­ate came as no sur­prise to eco­nom­ists. When you con­sider what the eco­nomy went through in the fi­nal three months of the year, some eco­nom­ists ar­gue its per­form­ance wasn’t so shabby.

“While 2.4% is fairly slug­gish, it was des­pite more ad­verse than usu­al weath­er at the end of the quarter and the gov­ern­ment shut­down at the start,” Jim O’Sul­li­van, chief U.S. eco­nom­ist at High Fre­quency Eco­nom­ics, said in a note to cli­ents after the re­port’s re­lease.

BEA’s re­vi­sion re­flects cuts in con­sumer spend­ing, lower in­vent­ory in­vest­ment, few­er ex­ports, and less state and loc­al gov­ern­ment spend­ing than ini­tially thought.

The 16-day par­tial gov­ern­ment shut­down is still be­lieved to have sub­trac­ted 0.3 per­cent­age points from growth, a spokes­wo­man for the Bur­eau of Eco­nom­ic Ana­lys­is con­firmed Fri­day. The bur­eau doesn’t spe­cific­ally break out weath­er ef­fects on the eco­nomy un­less there are cata­stroph­ic events, she said, but eco­nom­ists widely see the tough winter weath­er in Decem­ber, Janu­ary, and Feb­ru­ary as hav­ing con­trib­uted to the spate of soft data that have been re­leased re­cently.

“Part of [the re­cent] soft­ness may re­flect ad­verse weath­er con­di­tions, but at this point it’s dif­fi­cult to dis­cern ex­actly how much,” Fed­er­al Re­serve Chair Janet Yel­len told mem­bers of the Sen­ate Bank­ing Com­mit­tee on Thursday. “In the weeks and months ahead, my col­leagues and I will be at­tend­ant to sig­nals to in­dic­ate wheth­er the re­cov­ery is pro­gress­ing in line with our earli­er ex­pect­a­tions.”

Add back the 0.3 per­cent­age points from the gov­ern­ment shut­down and a little bit more from the weath­er’s drag, and the re­cov­ery seems to be pro­gress­ing as ex­pec­ted, said Robert Dye, chief eco­nom­ist of Comer­ica Bank. “This is not a 4 or 5 per­cent [growth] eco­nomy, it’s a maybe something in the or­der of 2.5 to 3 per­cent eco­nomy, so that’s not a bad num­ber,” Dye said of Fri­day’s re­vi­sion.

Eco­nom­ists don’t ex­pect much of a pickup in the first quarter, thanks to that bad weath­er and those weak data read­ings, but many re­main hope­ful that growth in 2014 is likely to beat out the 1.9 per­cent growth of last year.

The Bur­eau of Eco­nom­ic Ana­lys­is will re­lease an ad­di­tion­al up­date on fourth-quarter growth on March 27.

What We're Following See More »
WEST WING REDUX
Allison Janney Takes to the Real White House Podium
4 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Carolyn Kaster/AP

STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
4 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
5 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
6 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
9 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
×