2008 Bernanke Was ‘Decidedly Confused and Very Muddled’ About Crisis-Era Intervention

Transcripts from the financial crisis show Fed officials in a “wait-and-see” mode after Lehman’s collapse.

Chairman of the Federal Reserve Ben Bernanke testifies before the Senate Banking Committee on July, 21, 2011.
National Journal
Catherine Hollander
Feb. 21, 2014, 11:49 a.m.

Leh­man Broth­ers, the gi­ant in­vest­ment firm, de­clared bank­ruptcy in Septem­ber 2008. The next day, the Fed­er­al Re­serve’s policy-set­ting com­mit­tee con­vened for a reg­u­larly sched­uled meet­ing as mar­kets wondered just how far Leh­man’s col­lapse would ripple through the fin­an­cial sys­tem.

Ben Bernanke, then Fed chair­man, said he was “grap­pling” with the ne­ces­sity of mak­ing ad hoc de­cisions about “mor­al haz­ard,” ac­cord­ing to tran­scripts from the 2008 meet­ings, re­leased Fri­day after a five-year lag.

“In each event, in each in­stance, even though there is this sort of un­avoid­able ad hoc char­ac­ter to it, we are try­ing to make a judg­ment about the costs — from a fisc­al per­spect­ive, from a mor­al-haz­ard per­spect­ive, and so on — of tak­ing ac­tion versus the real pos­sib­il­ity in some cases that you might have very severe con­sequences for the fin­an­cial sys­tem and, there­fore, for the eco­nomy of not tak­ing ac­tion,” Bernanke said at the Fed­er­al Open Mar­ket Com­mit­tee’s Sept. 16 meet­ing.

“I am de­cidedly con­fused and very muddled about this,” he said.

Al­though we know now that the eco­nomy was go­ing to con­tin­ue its down­ward spir­al, most FOMC mem­bers — in­clud­ing then-San Fran­cisco Fed Pres­id­ent and now-Fed Chair Janet Yel­len — thought it was too soon to provide mon­et­ary ac­com­mod­a­tion in the form of fur­ther in­terest-rate cuts at that Septem­ber meet­ing.

“My policy pref­er­ence is to main­tain the fed­er­al-funds rate tar­get at the cur­rent level and to wait for some time to as­sess the im­pact of the Leh­man bank­ruptcy fil­ing, if any, on the na­tion­al eco­nomy,” said St. Louis Fed Pres­id­ent James Bul­lard. “I think we should be seen as mak­ing well-cal­cu­lated moves with the funds rate, and the cur­rent un­cer­tainty is so large that I don’t feel as though we have enough in­form­a­tion to make such cal­cu­la­tions today,” said Charles Evans, the Chica­go Fed pres­id­ent.

Like Bul­lard and Evans, Eric Rosen­gren, pres­id­ent of the Bo­ston Fed, wasn’t a vot­ing mem­ber at that Septem­ber meet­ing. But he had a dif­fer­ent take. “This is already a his­tor­ic week, and the week has just be­gun”¦. The de­gree of fin­an­cial dis­tress has ris­en markedly,” Rosen­gren said. “Giv­en that many bor­row­ers will face high­er in­terest rates as a res­ult of fin­an­cial prob­lems, we can help off­set this ad­di­tion­al drag by re­du­cing the fed­er­al-funds rate.”

The FOMC’s vot­ing mem­bers un­an­im­ously stood pat at that Septem­ber meet­ing’s con­clu­sion, leav­ing the fed­er­al-funds rate at 2 per­cent. As the eco­nomy con­tin­ued to un­ravel over the com­ing months, the Fed op­ted to act, cut­ting the rate to near zero when it met in Decem­ber and ush­er­ing in a new era of mon­et­ary policy as the Fed turned to un­con­ven­tion­al tools — like the three bond-buy­ing pro­grams it has since launched — to boost the eco­nomy.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Maher Weighs in on Bernie, Trump and Palin
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

“We haven’t seen a true leftist since FDR, so many millions are coming out of the woodwork to vote for Bernie Sanders; he is the Occupy movement now come to life in the political arena.” So says Bill Maher in his Hollywood Reporter cover story (more a stream-of-consciousness riff than an essay, actually). Conservative states may never vote for a socialist in the general election, but “this stuff has never been on the table, and these voters have never been activated.” Maher saves most of his bile for Donald Trump and Sarah Palin, writing that by nominating Palin as vice president “John McCain is the one who opened the Book of the Dead and let the monsters out.” And Trump is picking up where Palin left off.

Source:
×