CBO Defends Its Minimum-Wage Estimate as Democrats Fume

The nonpartisan budget referee rejects White House criticism of a report that finds the minimum-wage hike would reduce the workforce.

National Journal
Catherine Hollander
Feb. 19, 2014, 7:08 a.m.

White House pique not­with­stand­ing, the Con­gres­sion­al Budget Of­fice is stand­ing by its es­tim­ate of the job im­pact that a min­im­um-wage hike would cre­ate.

“Our ana­lys­is of the ef­fects of an in­crease in the min­im­um wage is com­pletely con­sist­ent with the latest think­ing in the eco­nom­ics pro­fes­sion,” said CBO Dir­ect­or Douglas El­men­d­orf, dis­put­ing the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion’s at­temp­ted take­down of his agency’s work.

The White House and con­gres­sion­al Demo­crats tried to paint CBO as out of touch with main­stream eco­nom­ic think­ing after the non­par­tis­an budget agency es­tim­ated rais­ing the min­im­um wage to $10.10 an hour could re­duce the num­ber of work­ers in the labor force by 500,000 in 2016. (It also found that the wage pro­pos­al would lift 900,000 people out of poverty in the same year.) Re­pub­lic­ans seized on the news of job losses as evid­ence a high­er min­im­um wage is bad policy.

El­men­d­orf ar­gued that it’s a little hard to com­pare CBO’s find­ings, which covered both an in­crease in the fed­er­al min­im­um to $10.10 and to $9 from the cur­rent level of $7.25, with oth­er eco­nom­ists’ as­ser­tions on the job im­pact of the min­im­um wage be­cause the lat­ter didn’t ne­ces­sar­ily have to quanti­fy their es­tim­ates. But, he said, CBO ap­pears to line up with what oth­er eco­nom­ists — who have spoken in qual­it­at­ive lan­guage — have found.

The budget-of­fice dir­ect­or poin­ted to a sur­vey of eco­nom­ists con­duc­ted last year by the Uni­versity of Chica­go Booth School of Busi­ness’s Ini­ti­at­ive on Glob­al Mar­kets, which found them about equally di­vided on the ques­tion of wheth­er a hike of the min­im­um wage to $9 would make it “no­tice­ably harder” for low-skilled work­ers to find jobs. “We don’t know ex­actly what the re­spond­ents to that sur­vey meant by ‘no­tice­ably harder,’ ” he said, but CBO’s es­tim­ate might track with that.

He also poin­ted to a let­ter, or­gan­ized by the lib­er­al Eco­nom­ic Policy In­sti­tute, signed by 600 eco­nom­ists in sup­port of rais­ing the min­im­um wage to $10.10. Some sig­nat­or­ies of that let­ter were among those cri­ti­ciz­ing CBO’s re­port Tues­day. But, El­men­d­orf said Wed­nes­day, “I’m not sure we would dis­agree with their state­ment of the evid­ence.” The let­ter said, “The weight of evid­ence now show[s] that in­creases in the min­im­um wage have had little or no neg­at­ive ef­fect on the em­ploy­ment of min­im­um-wage work­ers.” The au­thors didn’t say what “little” meant, El­men­d­orf told re­port­ers at a break­fast hos­ted by the Chris­ti­an Sci­ence Mon­it­or, but “the range we [the CBO] have looks to me like a little re­duc­tion,” he said.

El­men­d­orf did not re­spond dir­ectly to re­marks from the White House Coun­cil of Eco­nom­ic Ad­visers’ Jason Fur­man, who said the CBO view was “out­side the con­sensus view of eco­nom­ists when it comes to the im­pact of the min­im­um wage on em­ploy­ment.”

The White House’s cri­ti­cism of the non­par­tis­an budget ref­er­ee was a de­par­ture from its re­sponse two weeks ago, when CBO is­sued an equally con­tro­ver­sial re­port find­ing that Obama­care could re­duce the labor force by the equi­val­ent of 2 mil­lion full-time work­ers in 2017. The White House stepped for­ward to cla­ri­fy those find­ings, which the GOP was hold­ing up as proof the law was a “job-killer,” not to ques­tion them.

“I don’t want to re­spond dir­ectly to what the CEA has said,” El­men­d­orf said Wed­nes­day, re­fer­ring to the min­im­um-wage find­ings. “We try to talk about our ana­lys­is and let oth­er people talk about theirs.”

What We're Following See More »
BACKING OUT ON BERNIE
Trump Won’t Debate Sanders After All
1 days ago
THE LATEST

Trump, in a statement: “Based on the fact that the Democratic nominating process is totally rigged and Crooked Hillary Clinton and Deborah Wasserman Schultz will not allow Bernie Sanders to win, and now that I am the presumptive Republican nominee, it seems inappropriate that I would debate the second place finisher. ... I will wait to debate the first place finisher in the Democratic Party, probably Crooked Hillary Clinton, or whoever it may be.”

AKNOWLEDGING THE INEVITABLE
UAW: Time to Unite Behind Hillary
3 days ago
THE DETAILS

"It's about time for unity," said UAW President Dennis Williams. "We're endorsing Hillary Clinton. She's gotten 3 million more votes than Bernie, a million more votes than Donald Trump. She's our nominee." He called Sanders "a great friend of the UAW" while saying Trump "does not support the economic security of UAW families." Some 28 percent of UAW members indicated their support for Trump in an internal survey.

Source:
AP KEEPING COUNT
Trump Clinches Enough Delegates for the Nomination
3 days ago
THE LATEST

"Donald Trump on Thursday reached the number of delegates needed to clinch the Republican nomination for president, completing an unlikely rise that has upended the political landscape and sets the stage for a bitter fall campaign. Trump was put over the top in the Associated Press delegate count by a small number of the party's unbound delegates who told the AP they would support him at the convention."

Source:
TRUMP FLOATED IDEA ON JIMMY KIMMEL’S SHOW
Trump/Sanders Debate Before California Primary?
3 days ago
THE LATEST
CAMPAIGNS INJECTED NEW AD MONEY
California: It’s Not Over Yet
3 days ago
THE LATEST

"Clinton and Bernie Sanders "are now devoting additional money to television advertising. A day after Sanders announced a new ad buy of less than $2 million in the state, Clinton announced her own television campaign. Ads featuring actor Morgan Freeman as well as labor leader and civil rights activist Dolores Huerta will air beginning on Fridayin Fresno, Sacramento, and Los Angeles media markets. Some ads will also target Latino voters and Asian American voters. The total value of the buy is about six figures according to the Clinton campaign." Meanwhile, a new poll shows Sanders within the margin of error, trailing Clinton 44%-46%.

Source:
×