I grew up in a restaurant, spending my teenage years and early twenties waitressing. And my favorite day out of all 365 was Valentine’s Day.
Why? Because of money.
Yes, it may sound depressing that a woman in the prime of her youth looked forward to spending her Valentine’s Day waiting on lovestruck couples. But think about it: a restaurant packed with couples, ordering only the finest things on the menu. That means small parties (which is less work) with larger-than-usual bills, equaling larger tips. And the absolute worst day of the year to go stingy on tipping is on the day you’re trying to impress your significant other. I easily walked away with double what I normally made in tips on a typical busy, weekend night.
There’s plenty of grumbling from those who advise forsaking a restaurant dining experience because of pricey, fixed menus. But not all restaurants have fixed menus on this day, and people still drop a lot of money. The average diner plans to spend $74.19 eating out on Valentine’s Day this year, according to the National Retail Federation.
New York diners expect to spend an average of $158.43 on a dinner for two tonight, according to Zagat’s 2014 survey. That’s quite a bit higher than the average New Yorker spends on a typical meal out, at $48.56 per person.
Valentine’s Day is the second busiest night of the year for restaurants, second only to Mother’s Day, according to the National Restaurant Association. But for many servers, Mother’s Day isn’t as attractive of a workday; it typically consists of large parties with demanding requests who often dine during lunch hours, when meals tend to be cheaper.
And many couples go to their favorite restaurants to eat, says the restaurant organization. Sure, there are bad, regular tippers out there, but diners have more of an incentive to tip servers well when they will face them again.
No matter where you stand on whether the federal minimum wage — particularly for tipped workers — should be increased, do your local servers a solid tonight: eat out and tip well. It’s the Valentine’s Day gift they are counting on.
What We're Following See More »
Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”
“We haven’t seen a true leftist since FDR, so many millions are coming out of the woodwork to vote for Bernie Sanders; he is the Occupy movement now come to life in the political arena.” So says Bill Maher in his Hollywood Reporter cover story (more a stream-of-consciousness riff than an essay, actually). Conservative states may never vote for a socialist in the general election, but “this stuff has never been on the table, and these voters have never been activated.” Maher saves most of his bile for Donald Trump and Sarah Palin, writing that by nominating Palin as vice president “John McCain is the one who opened the Book of the Dead and let the monsters out.” And Trump is picking up where Palin left off.