Janet Yellen lived up to her “continuity candidate” reputation during her extra-long public debut as Federal Reserve Board chair on Tuesday.
Yellen announced no major policy shifts in her testimony, which spanned six hours (including breaks), before the House Financial Services Committee. “Not a lot of new ground was broken, but that was to be expected,” Richard Moody, chief economist at Regions Financial, emailed around hour five.
Yellen was, after all, the Fed’s No. 2 policymaker beginning in 2010. She had espoused many of the same views as Chairman Ben Bernanke in that role. So when the announcement that Yellen was President Obama’s pick to succeed Bernanke was made on Oct. 9, economists expected her to approach the job with the same general philosophy as her predecessor.
“Beyond speaking style, there was little differentiation,” Brett Ryan, vice president for U.S. economic research at Deutsche Bank, said in an email during her testimony. Even with that speaking style, marked by Yellen’s Brooklyn accent, she deployed a number of Bernanke-isms, noting for example, that monetary policy “is not a panacea” for the economy’s woes and that the dual mandate “has served us well,” favorite expressions of the Fed chief who departed on Jan. 31.
And like Bernanke, Yellen argued that proposed legislation to open up the Fed’s monetary policy decision to audits from the Government Accountability Office would do more harm than good. Like Bernanke, she stressed that the Fed’s unwinding of its bond-buying program, which began in December, is not on a pre-set course.
“I think that Janet Yellen is well on her way toward accomplishing her goal of navigating a smooth transition at the Fed,” Robert Dye, chief economist at Comerica Bank, emailed.
Deutsche Bank’s Ryan saw a subtle distinction in how Yellen described the Federal Reserve’s looming decision about raising its benchmark interest rate, which has been near zero since December 2008. The Fed has said it would keep the rate low at least as long as unemployment is above 6.5 percent and the outlook for inflation is no higher than 2.5 percent over the coming year or two. With the jobless rate at 6.6 percent as of last Friday’s employment report, economists were looking for clarity on how the central bank would make the call to raise rates.
“Crossing one of these thresholds will not automatically prompt an increase in the federal funds rate, but will instead indicate only that it had become appropriate for the committee to consider whether the broader economic outlook would justify such an increase,” Yellen said in her prepared testimony.
In addition to being notable for its length, Yellen’s testimony bore plenty of the hallmarks of a first day on the job. House Financial Services Committee Chairman Jeb Hensarling, R-Texas, had to ask Yellen to adjust her microphone a handful of times. Some committee members pointed out to the Fed chief where they were sitting, to help her know where to look while answering their questions. A man approached Yellen for an autograph during a break from the hearing. Another woman asked to have her photo taken with the new Fed chair, who is the first woman to lead the central bank in its 100-year history.
Some of those first-day hallmarks extended beyond navigating Room 2128 of the Rayburn House Office Building or being approached by strangers. When asked about the Financial Stability Oversight Council, a group of regulators convened by the Dodd-Frank Act to discuss risks to the country’s financial stability, Yellen noted that she had yet to attend a meeting.
It will take time before any real distinctions between Yellen and her predecessor emerge. For now, Rep. Ed Perlmutter, D-Colo., paid Yellen a compliment after three hours of testimony that can only be seen as positive in the Fed chair’s world of trying not to rattle markets every time they speak. “[Bernanke] was very smart, very steady, and not very exciting, and I want to say you’re following in his footsteps,” Perlmutter said.
What We're Following See More »
Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.
Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”
Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."
In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-expected primary battle behind her, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton (D) is no longer going on the air in upcoming primary states. “Team Clinton hasn’t spent a single cent in … California, Indiana, Kentucky, Oregon and West Virginia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “campaign has spent a little more than $1 million in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone backer in the Senate, said the candidate should end his presidential campaign if he’s losing to Hillary Clinton after the primary season concludes in June, breaking sharply with the candidate who is vowing to take his insurgent bid to the party convention in Philadelphia.”
The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."