House GOP’s Debt Limit Plan Is Slap in the Face to Paul Ryan

Republicans agreed Monday night to overturn a Ryan provision in exchange for a debt-ceiling vote.

Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wis.
National Journal
Sarah Mimms
See more stories about...
Sarah Mimms
Feb. 10, 2014, 1:16 p.m.

House Re­pub­lic­ans agreed on a plan Monday to in­crease the debt ceil­ing, weeks be­fore Treas­ury Sec­ret­ary Jac­ob Lew has in­dic­ated the U.S. will de­fault. The pro­pos­al is likely to earn the back­ing of a bi­par­tis­an group of mem­bers and pass the House eas­ily on Wed­nes­day.

But in all of the back-slap­ping over House Re­pub­lic­ans’ avoid­ing an­oth­er last-minute battle over the na­tion’s fin­ances, one clear loser stands out: Rep. Paul Ry­an.

To get an agree­ment that would at­tract their own mem­bers and Demo­crats alike, House Re­pub­lic­ans threw one of their own un­der the bus just two months after he ac­cep­ted con­grat­u­la­tions along­side Sen. Patty Mur­ray as the two who beat the odds and not only for­mu­lated — but passed — a two-year budget deal in one of the most in­tract­able Con­gresses in memory.

House Re­pub­lic­ans agreed to their plan to raise the debt lim­it Monday even­ing, adding it to le­gis­la­tion that would re­peal cuts to re­tired mil­it­ary per­son­nel’s pen­sion plans, says Rep. Den­nis Ross of Flor­ida. Ry­an spe­cific­ally pushed for those cuts in his ne­go­ti­ations with Mur­ray late last year. That re­peal will be paid for by ex­tend­ing se­quest­ra­tion for man­dat­ory spend­ing by one year. That ex­ten­sion won’t come for 10 years.

Ross said GOP re­ac­tion to the plan was “mixed.” The pro­pos­al does not have the sup­port of the full Re­pub­lic­an caucus, ac­cord­ing to sev­er­al oth­er GOP law­makers, but lead­er­ship will whip Monday night to find out where they stand.

Asked about the plan Monday night, Paul Ry­an re­peatedly said, “I’ve got noth­ing for you.”

Ry­an, who has cham­pioned en­ti­tle­ment re­form since tak­ing over the chair­man­ship of the House Budget Com­mit­tee, pushed hard for the cuts dur­ing the budget ne­go­ti­ations, know­ing he wouldn’t be able to get a lar­ger en­ti­tle­ment over­haul past the Demo­crat­ic Sen­ate.

But the piece­meal ap­proach to the over­haul of mil­it­ary pen­sions alone, which does not even take ef­fect un­til the end of 2015, has proven to be a pop­u­lar tar­get.

Neither party seemed thrilled with the cuts in the first place, and sev­er­al mem­bers of both parties cited the COLA changes in their de­cision to op­pose the budget deal in Decem­ber. The cuts have also been the tar­get of sev­er­al bills in the Sen­ate over the last few weeks. In fact, at the time House Re­pub­lic­ans were pitch­ing their plan to mem­ber­ship, the Sen­ate voted to in­voke clo­ture on a bill that would re­verse the cuts.

Mur­ray was quick to dis­tance her­self from the cuts, push­ing le­gis­la­tion that would re­verse the cuts for dis­abled vet­er­ans and those re­ceiv­ing sur­viv­ors’ be­ne­fits. Ry­an sup­por­ted the lat­ter move, but has held fast to his be­lief that the cuts are just the first step in a much longer, and ne­ces­sary, pro­cess of over­haul­ing the mil­it­ary pen­sion sys­tem as a whole, not­ing that pay­ments to re­tir­ees rose nearly 50 per­cent between fisc­al 2002 and fisc­al 2012.

Ry­an has noted that he is open to oth­er op­tions — as long as they are paid for and deal with the lar­ger is­sue of a bal­loon­ing sys­tem. Con­gress formed a com­mis­sion in 2012 that will re­lease its re­com­mend­a­tions for a more com­plete over­haul in early 2015.

“I stand be­hind the need for re­form.”¦ For me, there’s simply no choice between re­spons­ible re­forms of mil­it­ary com­pens­a­tion and mak­ing what our mil­it­ary lead­er­ship has called ‘dis­pro­por­tion­ate cuts to mil­it­ary read­i­ness and mod­ern­iz­a­tion.’ Every time we kick the can down the road, we put our troops’ com­bat read­i­ness at risk,” Ry­an wrote in a USA Today op-ed. “This agree­ment put for­ward one re­form op­tion, and I in­vite oth­ers to do the same.”

But Monday’s debt-lim­it agree­ment is hardly the kind of re­form plan Ry­an was look­ing for. It rolls back the cuts without provid­ing any pro­pos­als for fu­ture al­ter­a­tions to the pen­sion pro­gram.

In one sense, House lead­er­ship’s cal­cu­lus is simple: A small, but sig­ni­fic­ant, force of con­ser­vat­ives will not sup­port a debt hike without ma­jor con­ces­sions, and they’re un­likely to get them. Rep. John Flem­ing, a mem­ber of the Re­pub­lic­an Study Com­mit­tee, es­tim­ated that 40 Re­pub­lic­ans are in that camp and would op­pose any of the debt-ceil­ing op­tions lead­er­ship is con­sid­er­ing. It’s a simple equa­tion — Speak­er John Boehner had to put something on the floor that will at­tract Demo­crats.

A res­tor­a­tion of the COLA cuts could cer­tainly do that, and bring in a num­ber of Re­pub­lic­an votes as well. Those in the House ma­jor­ity who are forced to vote for the debt ceil­ing hike will be able to go home to their con­stitu­ents with the mes­sage that they voted to re­store fund­ing for our vet­er­ans.

However, the pro­pos­al does little for the House Re­pub­lic­an Con­fer­ence, which ini­tially called for spend­ing cuts in ex­change for rais­ing the debt lim­it. Rather than re­du­cing the de­fi­cit, re­vers­ing the mil­it­ary pen­sion cuts will ac­tu­ally cost $6 bil­lion through 2025. Even if Re­pub­lic­ans man­age to find a suit­able pay-for, the fix will have a neut­ral ef­fect.

What We're Following See More »
WEST WING REDUX
Allison Janney Takes to the Real White House Podium
2 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Carolyn Kaster/AP

STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
2 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
3 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
4 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
7 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
×