CBO Responds to Obamacare Controversy

Anti-Obamacare protesters wear masks of U.S. President Barack Obama and Grim Reaper as they demonstrate in front of the U.S. Supreme Court June 28, 2012 in Washington, D.C.
National Journal
Catherine Hollander
Feb. 10, 2014, 12:05 p.m.

The non­par­tis­an Con­gres­sion­al Budget Of­fice was heard all over Wash­ing­ton last week when it re­leased its up­dated budget and eco­nom­ic out­look. Now, the of­fice is at­tempt­ing to be un­der­stood.

CBO on Monday pos­ted a “Fre­quently Asked Ques­tions” doc­u­ment aimed at clear­ing up the out­look’s most con­tro­ver­sial con­clu­sion, an es­tim­ate that Obama­care would re­duce the num­ber of hours worked by the equi­val­ent of 2.5 mil­lion full-time work­ers in 2024.

“That ana­lys­is has at­trac­ted a great deal of at­ten­tion and raised sev­er­al ques­tions,” the budget of­fice said dryly in a blog post at­trib­uted to its dir­ect­or, Douglas El­men­d­orf. Last week, con­gres­sion­al Re­pub­lic­ans had seized on the fig­ures as evid­ence the Af­ford­able Care Act was the job-killer they al­ways ar­gued it was. A num­ber of health care wonks went in­to over­drive to ex­plain why that was an over­sim­pli­fic­a­tion of CBO’s find­ings.

Will 2.5 mil­lion people lose their jobs in 10 years, thanks to the ACA? “We would not de­scribe our es­tim­ates in that way,” El­men­d­orf wrote Monday.

It’s a mat­ter of choice, he said. “Be­cause the longer-term re­duc­tion in work is ex­pec­ted to come al­most en­tirely from a de­cline in the amount of labor that work­ers choose to sup­ply in re­sponse to the changes in their in­cent­ives, we do not think it is ac­cur­ate to say that the re­duc­tion stems from people ‘los­ing’ their jobs,” El­men­d­orf wrote. Wheth­er or not people choos­ing to work less is be­ne­fi­cial to so­ci­ety or the eco­nomy more broadly “is a mat­ter of judg­ment,” he said.

The CBO dir­ect­or re­it­er­ated the un­cer­tainty in­her­ent in all of the budget of­fice’s es­tim­ates. The latest es­tim­ate of the im­pact of the Af­ford­able Care Act on the work­force is just as likely to be too large as it is to be too small, he said.

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4716) }}

What We're Following See More »
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
12 hours ago

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Maher Weighs in on Bernie, Trump and Palin
13 hours ago

“We haven’t seen a true leftist since FDR, so many millions are coming out of the woodwork to vote for Bernie Sanders; he is the Occupy movement now come to life in the political arena.” So says Bill Maher in his Hollywood Reporter cover story (more a stream-of-consciousness riff than an essay, actually). Conservative states may never vote for a socialist in the general election, but “this stuff has never been on the table, and these voters have never been activated.” Maher saves most of his bile for Donald Trump and Sarah Palin, writing that by nominating Palin as vice president “John McCain is the one who opened the Book of the Dead and let the monsters out.” And Trump is picking up where Palin left off.