Why We Need to Look at More Than Job Growth to Get a Real Sense of the Economy

The payroll pictures this month were weak, while the unemployment picture was slightly better.

Hundreds of people line up to attend a job fair in April n New York City.
National Journal
Catherine Hollander
Feb. 7, 2014, 4:57 a.m.

Payroll growth in Janu­ary was dis­ap­point­ing: a measly 113,000 jobs, the Bur­eau of Labor Stat­ist­ics said Fri­day morn­ing, well be­low eco­nom­ists’ fore­cast for a gain of 180,000.

On top of that, the Decem­ber payroll num­ber — the ugly, 74,000 jobs num­bers that every­one hoped would be re­vised up in the latest re­port — was barely changed.

However, the oth­er gauge of the labor mar­ket’s health, which comes from a dif­fer­ent BLS sur­vey, tells a dif­fer­ent story. The un­em­ploy­ment rate dropped to 6.6 per­cent last month, from 6.7 per­cent at the end of 2013.

Cru­cially, it did this while labor-force par­ti­cip­a­tion rose, mean­ing more people were either work­ing or seek­ing work. This is what eco­nom­ists call a de­cline for the “right reas­ons.” In past months, however, a de­cline in par­ti­cip­a­tion — dis­cour­aged work­ers drop­ping out of the labor force — has con­trib­uted to the fall­ing job­less rate. 

The con­trast­ing nature of the labor mar­ket’s two head­line num­bers re­veals how dif­fi­cult it is to use a single in­dic­at­or when dis­cuss­ing the job mar­ket these days.

It’s a prob­lem that has been ac­know­ledged at the Fed­er­al Re­serve, which has said it ex­pects to keep its bench­mark in­terest rate low “at least as long as” un­em­ploy­ment re­mains above 6.5 per­cent. Janet Yel­len, the new chair of the Fed, said the un­em­ploy­ment rate was prob­ably the single best in­dic­at­or of job-mar­ket health last spring. But, she said, “the un­em­ploy­ment rate also has its lim­it­a­tions.”

So even though the Fed said it might start to raise its bench­mark in­terest rate once that num­ber reached 6.5 per­cent, the wiggle room af­forded by this as­ser­tion — “at least as long” — in the cent­ral bank’s policy state­ment lets it take oth­er vari­ables in­to ac­count: factors such as the rate at which people are quit­ting their jobs and get­ting new ones, the long-term un­em­ploy­ment rate, and labor-force par­ti­cip­a­tion.

Mo­hamed El-Erian, the out­go­ing chief ex­ec­ut­ive of glob­al in­vest­ment firm Pimco, wrote in the Fin­an­cial Times Thursday that he thinks the job­less rate is los­ing its util­ity . El-Erian ar­gues that not only is the un­em­ploy­ment rate be­com­ing an in­creas­ingly use­less lag­ging in­dic­at­or — how well it de­scribes the health of the labor mar­ket — he also says it’s be­com­ing a bad lead­ing in­dic­at­or. Spe­cific­ally, he says the un­em­ploy­ment rate is no longer good at pre­dict­ing what the Fed will do.

“The Fed is slowly ex­tend­ing the concept of thresholds to a wider ar­ray of vari­ables, in­clud­ing more hol­ist­ic meas­ures of the labor mar­ket and, more im­port­antly, in­fla­tion tar­gets that are in ex­cess of the cur­rent (and pro­jec­ted) rate,” he said.

The payroll pic­tures this month were weak. The un­em­ploy­ment pic­ture was slightly bet­ter. A caveat: The sur­vey that pro­duces the payroll num­ber is lar­ger, and less volat­ile on a month-to-month basis. As such, eco­nom­ists af­ford its monthly read­ing slightly more weight than the sur­vey that pro­duces the un­em­ploy­ment readout. But to un­der­stand the labor mar­ket, we’ve got to talk about both.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
CITIZENS UNITED PT. 2?
Movie Based on ‘Clinton Cash’ to Debut at Cannes
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."

Source:
×