These Conservatives Are Done Fighting Over the Debt Ceiling

The last time around, they put up a giant fight over government funding. Now some Republicans have mellowed out — and would settle for a clean bill.

Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-MN) speaks to reporters after a news conference May 16, 2013 on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC.
National Journal
Elahe Izadi
Feb. 6, 2014, 11:03 a.m.

The world looked dif­fer­ent four months ago for con­ser­vat­ives. They were fired up. The gov­ern­ment was shut down over de­mands to de­fund, then delay, Obama­care, and the debt-ceil­ing in­crease vote was around the corner. “We’re really, very en­er­gized today. We’re very strong,” Rep. Michele Bach­mann told Fox’s Sean Han­nity then. “This is about the hap­pi­est I’ve seen mem­bers in a long time be­cause we’ve seen we’re start­ing to win this dia­logue on a na­tion­al level.”

But now with an­oth­er ma­jor dead­line ahead — the debt ceil­ing — Bach­mann and oth­er Re­pub­lic­ans sound markedly dif­fer­ent. “What I’ve heard from oth­er mem­bers,” Bach­mann says, “is that this is not go­ing to be the hill that they’re go­ing to die on.”

“You have to know when to hold them and you have to know when to fold them,” ad­ded Bach­mann, who isn’t ad­voc­at­ing for a clean debt-ceil­ing bill. “You just need to be wise to know when to have polit­ic­al fights. It isn’t that our al­le­gi­ance to prin­ciples have changed; it hasn’t at all. You just need to know when your op­por­tun­it­ies are and when to ex­er­cise your lever­age.”

With House Speak­er John Boehner re­peatedly vow­ing that the coun­try will not de­fault on its debt, and lead­er­ship look­ing for sweeten­ers to a debt-ceil­ing in­crease, some con­ser­vat­ives are ac­tu­ally say­ing a clean bill should come to the floor now. That’s how they ex­pect this whole epis­ode to play out any­way, they reas­on. They’ll vote against it, but save the drama.

“What’s the defin­i­tion of in­san­ity? Do­ing the same thing over and ex­pect­ing dif­fer­ent res­ults. That ap­plies in this case,” says Re­pub­lic­an Rep. Thomas Massie of Ken­tucky. “You can ex­pect the same res­ults if you have the same par­ti­cipants.”

It’s an “ob­vi­ous” real­iz­a­tion, he adds.

Rep. Raul Lab­rador of Idaho has said the House should just take up a clean debt-ceil­ing bill. “Give the Demo­crats their vote. We don’t have to vote for it.” Like­wise, Rep. Justin Amash of Michigan ac­know­ledged where things are headed: “I wish they would do something sub­stant­ive, but they’re not go­ing to, so let’s just avoid the theat­er and get on with it.”

In­deed, “a sense of real­ism among the con­fer­ence” has taken hold, Bach­mann says. Let the Demo­crats take a tough vote first or at­tach something that would do some good, she reas­ons.

But what about the Hastert Rule, which in­form­ally for­bids any bill be­ing put on the floor without the sup­port of the ma­jor­ity of the ma­jor­ity? House Re­pub­lic­an lead­er­ship has already broken it six times from 2011 to 2013, and it looks like it may again. “Moth­er Teresa is a saint now, but if the Con­gress wanted to make her a saint and at­tach that to the debt ceil­ing, we prob­ably couldn’t get 218 Re­pub­lic­an votes,” Boehner said Thursday.

While Rep. John Flem­ing of Louisi­ana doesn’t want a clean bill first, he says “there is some mer­it” to con­ser­vat­ive mem­bers say­ing a clean bill should just move for­ward now. “We’re at a point now where we’ve got about as much dis­cre­tion­ary spend­ing as we can get out of this ad­min­is­tra­tion,” he says. He es­tim­ated that as many as 40 Re­pub­lic­ans will vote against a debt-ceil­ing in­crease no mat­ter what’s at­tached to it.

Con­ser­vat­ives push back on the idea that this new sense of real­ism is an at­ti­tude change. Rather, it’s a re­sponse to changed cir­cum­stances. Ahead of the gov­ern­ment shut­down, Obama­care was about to be im­ple­men­ted. They felt this was their last shot to make a grand stand to pre­vent it from be­ing rolled out. “Com­mon sense [told] you that this pres­id­ent has got to con­sider delay­ing or at least re­view­ing, re­con­sid­er­ing or al­ter­ing” Obama­care, Flem­ing says. “We were will­ing to go to the mat for that reas­on.”

The shut­down and how it played out dis­ab­used them of that idea. But con­fid­ence in their lead­er­ship also plays a ma­jor role. Even be­fore House Re­pub­lic­ans huddled at their an­nu­al re­treat to hash out a debt-ceil­ing strategy, lead­er­ship was sig­nal­ing a de­fault wouldn’t hap­pen.

“What you’re pick­ing up from a lot of con­ser­vat­ives on the Hill, and this ex­tends bey­ond the Hill, is they re­cog­nize their lead­er­ship in Con­gress isn’t will­ing to fight,” Dan Holler of Her­it­age Ac­tion says. “Their mem­bers, their con­stitu­ents — no one wants to see a fake fight. No one wants to see them go­ing through the mo­tions.”

So while Re­pub­lic­ans search for something they can at­tach to a debt-lim­it in­crease, some con­ser­vat­ives are resign­ing them­selves to the in­ev­it­able con­clu­sion. And the only way to change a con­clu­sion that looks in­ev­it­able is to switch up the cast of char­ac­ters. There’s al­ways Novem­ber. “We need to change the Sen­ate,” Massie says.

Sarah Mimms contributed to this article.
What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
CITIZENS UNITED PT. 2?
Movie Based on ‘Clinton Cash’ to Debut at Cannes
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."

Source:
×