The Behind-the-Scenes Battle for the Future of the Internet

The noise over net neutrality is coming from Congress, but the real action is elsewhere.

National Journal
Brendan Sasso
Feb. 6, 2014, 6:49 a.m.

Demo­crats can’t do any­thing about a court rul­ing that struck down their cher­ished net-neut­ral­ity rules, but they know someone who can.

The now-van­quished “Open In­ter­net” rules were the province of the Fed­er­al Com­mu­nic­a­tions Com­mis­sion, and that’s where Demo­crats are pin­ning their hopes to re­store them.

At stake, they say, is no less than the fu­ture of the In­ter­net. The FCC’s rules re­quired In­ter­net ser­vice pro­viders to treat all web­sites equally. Demo­crats fear that without the rules, In­ter­net pro­viders could soon start slow­ing down ac­cess to web­sites like Net­flix and Google un­less the sites pay for spe­cial In­ter­net “fast lanes.” The In­ter­net pro­viders could even block ac­cess to par­tic­u­lar sites al­to­geth­er.

In Con­gress, top House and Sen­ate Demo­crats launched le­gis­la­tion Monday aimed at restor­ing the rules, at least while the FCC crafts new ones. But that’s all for show: The bill is dead on ar­rival in the House, where Re­pub­lic­ans have long des­pised the FCC’s net-neut­ral­ity rules — vir­tu­ally every one of them voted to re­peal the rules in 2011. Per the GOP, the reg­u­la­tions are an out­dated, un­ne­ces­sary, and bur­den­some in­tru­sion in­to the busi­ness de­cisions of In­ter­net pro­viders such as Com­cast and Ve­r­i­zon.

In­stead, the Demo­crats’ bill is aimed at mak­ing their voice heard at the site of the real fight for the fu­ture of the In­ter­net: the FCC. The rep­res­ent­at­ives are beg­ging com­mis­sion Chair­man Tom Wheel­er to act uni­lat­er­ally to re­store the rules.

“It is con­gres­sion­al pres­sure,” a Demo­crat­ic aide said, adding that the le­gis­la­tion shows that Demo­crats on the Hill will stand be­hind Wheel­er if he moves to re­in­state the rules. “Many seni­or mem­bers be­lieve that the FCC needs to take ac­tion — that simply ac­cept­ing the court’s de­cision is not sat­is­fact­ory.”

And Wheel­er has all the votes he needs to do so; he’s an Obama ap­pointee and at the head of an ideo­lo­gic­al ma­jor­ity on the five-mem­ber com­mis­sion. The ques­tion now is wheth­er he’ll take ac­tion, and how.

He has a few op­tions for try­ing to sal­vage the reg­u­la­tions, which were first pro­mul­gated by his pre­de­cessor, Ju­li­us Gen­achow­ski, in 2010. Wheel­er could ap­peal the de­cision, but with a un­an­im­ous rul­ing against the FCC from a three-judge pan­el of the Court of Ap­peals for the D.C. Cir­cuit, the agency’s chances don’t look good.

The most dra­mat­ic op­tion would be to re­clas­si­fy broad­band In­ter­net as a “tele­com­mu­nic­a­tions ser­vice,” which the FCC has broad au­thor­ity to reg­u­late. Re­clas­si­fic­a­tion would put the rules on firmer leg­al ground but would prompt an im­me­di­ate back­lash from con­gres­sion­al Re­pub­lic­ans, who would view the move as a gov­ern­ment takeover of the In­ter­net.

The FCC has sweep­ing powers over phone com­pan­ies, down to the prices they charge and the areas they serve. Im­pos­ing a sim­il­ar reg­u­lat­ory re­gime on the In­ter­net would strangle its growth, Re­pub­lic­ans fear. The FCC could re­clas­si­fy broad­band while also im­pos­ing cer­tain lim­its on its own abil­ity to reg­u­late, but that re­straint may do little to ap­pease the agency’s crit­ics.

An­oth­er op­tion would be to try to re­work the rules un­der the ex­ist­ing au­thor­ity.

Al­though the court struck down the spe­cif­ic rules in the case, it did up­hold the FCC’s over­all au­thor­ity to reg­u­late broad­band pro­viders. Wheel­er could start a new rule­mak­ing pro­cess or just an­nounce the prin­ciples he in­tends to pro­tect un­der the agency’s cur­rent powers. But re­work­ing the rules would al­most cer­tainly mean wa­ter­ing them down.

Har­old Feld, the seni­or vice pres­id­ent for con­sumer ad­vocacy group Pub­lic Know­ledge, ex­pressed doubt that the FCC will be able to en­act ef­fect­ive reg­u­la­tions without re­clas­si­fy­ing broad­band as a tele­com­mu­nic­a­tions ser­vice.

“[FCC of­fi­cials] may be think­ing that they can pick off enough of the most ob­vi­ous forms of ab­use that it would be ad­equate,” he said. “I don’t think it would be.”

Feld noted that be­cause Demo­crats con­trol the White House and the Sen­ate, Re­pub­lic­ans can’t pass le­gis­la­tion to undo an FCC de­cision to re­clas­si­fy broad­band. “People get paid to do their job,” Feld said. “And one of the things that every­body said about Wheel­er that was go­ing to be so great was that he was go­ing to have the spine and will­ing­ness to do his job, and he wasn’t go­ing to chick­en out just be­cause people make a lot of noise.”

The Demo­crat­ic Hill aide said law­makers are in­ten­tion­ally try­ing to leave Wheel­er’s op­tions open and not dic­tate what ac­tion he should take. But the aide said most Demo­crats be­lieve the FCC needs to have some kind of net-neut­ral­ity rules on the books.

“The ac­tion right now is at the FCC. The ball is in their court,” the aide said.

Wheel­er has re­peatedly stated that he is com­mit­ted to pro­tect­ing a free and open In­ter­net. Speak­ing after the FCC’s meet­ing last week, he said he is still look­ing at “all of the tools in the tool­box” and that the agency will an­nounce a “plan and ra­tionale shortly” for deal­ing with net neut­ral­ity.

What We're Following See More »
WEST WING REDUX
Allison Janney Takes to the Real White House Podium
7 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Carolyn Kaster/AP

STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
8 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
9 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
10 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
12 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
×