Nancy Pelosi on Daily Show: Congress Is Unproductive Because of Tea Partiers With ‘No Agenda’

Nancy Pelosi blamed Congress’s lack of productivity on its most conservative lawmakers during a Thursday night interview with Jon Stewart. But she avoided giving specifics on what went wrong with Obamacare.

National Journal
Jack Fitzpatrick
See more stories about...
Jack Fitzpatrick
Jan. 30, 2014, 7:45 p.m.

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4698) }}

If it seems like Con­gress has a hard time get­ting any­thing done, Nancy Pelosi has an ex­plan­a­tion: tea-party Re­pub­lic­ans.

The House Minor­ity Lead­er told The Daily Show‘s Jon Stew­art Thursday night the “an­ti­gov­ern­ment, an­ti­science, anti-Obama” fac­tion of con­ser­vat­ives are to blame for the lack of pro­gress on a wide range of is­sues, while largely avoid­ing re­spons­ib­il­ity when pressed for an­swers on the botched Obama­care web­site rol­lout.

In a gen­er­al sense, Pelosi said, Con­gress was his­tor­ic­ally un­pro­duct­ive last year be­cause of con­ser­vat­ives who simply want to im­pede pro­gress.

“If you’re deal­ing with people who have no agenda — ‘Noth­ing is our agenda, and nev­er is our timetable’ — it’s very hard to ne­go­ti­ate with them,” Pelosi said.

Some of those more con­ser­vat­ive mem­bers even seemed de­term­ined not to stand and ap­plaud for any is­sues dur­ing Pres­id­ent Obama’s State of the Uni­on speech on Tues­day, she said.

But when Stew­art fo­cused on the spe­cif­ics of Pres­id­ent Obama’s health care law, Pelosi avoided the de­tails and fo­cused on the fact that the policy was “sol­id” and that the web­site would con­tin­ue to work bet­ter.

When asked dir­ectly what went wrong and wheth­er there were any sys­tem­ic is­sues that needed to be ad­dressed, Pelosi re­spon­ded, “I don’t know.”

In­ef­fi­cien­cies in the fed­er­al pro­cure­ment pro­cess could be to blame, Pelosi said, but she em­phas­ized that she felt good about the policy. The ins-and-outs of the rol­lout were out of her hands.

“It’s not my re­spons­ib­il­ity,” she said.

Pelosi said she did not want to make ex­cuses for the rol­lout. Sys­tem­ic prob­lems or not, she said, it should have gone bet­ter.

“What mat­ters is, it should have been pre­pared for,” she said. “There is no ex­cuse.”

What We're Following See More »
LOTS OF STRINGERS
Inside the AP’s Election Operation
4 hours ago
WHY WE CARE
THE QUESTION
What’s the Average Household Income of a Trump Voter?
4 hours ago
THE ANSWER

Seventy-two thousand dollars, according to FiveThirtyEight. That's higher than the national average, as well as the average Clinton or Sanders voter, but lower than the average Kasich voter.

Source:
VERY FEW DEMS NOW REPRESENT MINING COMMUNITIES
How Coal Country Went from Blue to Red
6 hours ago
WHY WE CARE
STAFF PICKS
History Already Being Less Kind to Hastert’s Leadership
9 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

In light of his recent confessions, the speakership of Dennis Hastert is being judged far more harshly. The New York Times' Carl Hulse notes that in hindsight, Hastert now "fares poorly" on a number of fronts, from his handling of the Mark Foley page scandal to "an explosion" of earmarks to the weakening of committee chairmen. "Even his namesake Hastert rule—the informal standard that no legislation should be brought to a vote without the support of a majority of the majority — has come to be seen as a structural barrier to compromise."

Source:
‘STARTING FROM ZERO’
Trump Ill Prepared for General Election
9 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Even if "[t]he Republican presidential nomination may be in his sights ... Trump has so far ignored vital preparations needed for a quick and effective transition to the general election. The New York businessman has collected little information about tens of millions of voters he needs to turn out in the fall. He's sent few people to battleground states compared with likely Democratic rival Hillary Clinton, accumulated little if any research on her, and taken no steps to build a network capable of raising the roughly $1 billion needed to run a modern-day general election campaign."

Source:
×