Democrats Want to Turn the Minimum Wage Into a Women’s Issue. Will It Work?

(L-R) Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), Sen. Barbara Mikulski (D-MD), Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH), Sen. Patty Murray (D-WA), Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY), Sen. Tammy Baldwin (D-WI) and Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-CA) wait for fellow women Democratic senators before holding a news conference to announce their support for raising the minimum wage to $10.10 at the U.S. Capitol January 30, 2014 in Washington, DC.
National Journal
Elahe Izadi
See more stories about...
Elahe Izadi
Jan. 31, 2014, midnight

Hik­ing the min­im­um wage has be­come the is­sue-of-the mo­ment for Demo­crats, and as with many oth­er ma­jor policy ini­ti­at­ives of late, they’re tout­ing it as le­gis­la­tion that has a great­er im­pact on wo­men.

It’s a tac­tic they em­braced in the run-up to the 2012 race, as the “War on Wo­men” nar­rat­ive took hold. But now in­stead of just tak­ing on ob­vi­ous wo­men’s is­sues — the Vi­ol­ence Against Wo­men Act, for in­stance — they’re tar­get­ing wo­men voters on health care, im­mig­ra­tion, and eco­nom­ic policy.

“Are Re­pub­lic­ans really go­ing to block giv­ing 15 mil­lion Amer­ic­an wo­men a raise? Are they pre­pared to tell one in four wo­men in Amer­ica that $7.25 an hour, which is barely enough to buy a couple gal­lons of gas, is enough for them to sup­port them­selves and their kids?” Sen. Patty Mur­ray, D-Wash., said at a press con­fer­ence, flanked by nearly all of the oth­er Demo­crat­ic wo­men in the Sen­ate. “If they are, what does block­ing a min­im­um-wage in­crease say about their pri­or­it­ies when it comes to Amer­ic­an wo­men?”

The law­makers poin­ted out that two-thirds of people earn­ing the fed­er­al min­im­um wage or less are wo­men. In the de­bate over the eco­nom­ics of wages, there are plenty of stat­ist­ics all sides use for their po­s­i­tions. Demo­crats say three-fourths of Amer­ic­ans back a hike (al­though that is for $9); Re­pub­lic­ans point to stud­ies show­ing a wage hike leads to more un­em­ploy­ment; those luke­warm on the is­sue note that few­er than 5 per­cent of work­ers paid hourly get a wage at or be­low the min­im­um.

As Demo­crats turn a wage hike in­to an is­sue with par­tic­u­lar im­port­ance to wo­men, a num­ber of Re­pub­lic­an law­makers ac­know­ledge that their party has got a way to go on this front.

“We’ve got more work to do in terms of our mes­saging, and par­tic­u­larly our mes­saging with wo­men and job cre­ation and high­er wages,” said Sen. John Ho­even, R-N.D. “The Re­pub­lic­an ap­proach goes to sup­ply and de­mand: How do we cre­ate the kind of busi­ness cli­mate that will en­cour­age private in­vest­ment, get com­pan­ies to hire more people, and cre­ate more jobs? And then that de­mand for labor, men and wo­men, helps move wages high­er.”

Sen. Susan Collins says mes­saging to­ward wo­men is something the GOP is get­ting bet­ter at do­ing. “That clearly has not been a strong point in the past, but I think if we can get wo­men to look at our eco­nom­ic policies, they will find them very at­tract­ive,” the Maine Re­pub­lic­an said. “But that means we have to avoid mem­bers mak­ing in­cen­di­ary re­marks about so­cial is­sues and thus ali­en­at­ing wo­men.”

It’s something that House lead­er­ship has taken note of; No. 4-rank­ing House Re­pub­lic­an Cathy Mc­Mor­ris Rodgers made the party’s State of the Uni­on re­sponse, tout­ing her per­son­al story as a work­ing moth­er and say­ing that “Re­pub­lic­ans have plans to close the gap — plans that fo­cus on jobs first, without more spend­ing, gov­ern­ment bail­outs, and red tape.”

The min­im­um wage is the top item Sen. Tom Har­kin wants to see pass be­fore he re­tires at the end of his term. Ac­cord­ing to the Iowa Demo­crat, who au­thored a wage-hike bill, “The mo­mentum is build­ing on this — really build­ing on this. Even Bill O’Re­illy says $10 sounds about right.”

The chances of a wage hike passing, Har­kin says, are “very good, and I’m not be­ing Pol­ly­anna-ish about this — and I’ve been around a long time. I’m Pol­ly­anna-ish about some things, but not this.” 

Make no mis­take, the bill has a ways to go. It will hit the Sen­ate floor in early March, and while Har­kin says he’s open to com­prom­ises to “sweeten the pot” for Re­pub­lic­ans to back it, he won’t be on board with go­ing be­low the $10.10 he’s pro­pos­ing. Mur­ray and oth­ers con­curred.

Whatever com­prom­ises could come up would likely be un­ac­cept­able to Demo­crats. Har­kin by­passed a com­mit­tee markup to avoid “em­bar­rass­ing amend­ments” from Re­pub­lic­ans.

And then there’s the busi­ness of what will hap­pen in the House. As Pres­id­ent Obama an­nounced that he was rais­ing the wage for work­ers on new fed­er­al con­tracts via ex­ec­ut­ive ac­tion this week and would be vis­it­ing states and busi­nesses that have raised their wages, Rep. James Lank­ford of Ok­lahoma, a mem­ber of Re­pub­lic­an House lead­er­ship, said he doesn’t see a fed­er­al hike hap­pen­ing this Con­gress. “If busi­nesses are do­ing it and states are do­ing it, then why do we have to do this as the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment? The mar­ket is already de­term­in­ing that,” Lank­ford said.

If Sen­ate Re­pub­lic­ans kill a min­im­um-wage hike, or House Re­pub­lic­ans don’t both­er to take it up, they’ll be talk­ing in­stead about how they want to cre­ate bet­ter-pay­ing jobs. A fa­vor­ite talk­ing point of House Re­pub­lic­an lead­er­ship is that they’ve passed dozens of jobs bills they are wait­ing for Sen­ate Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id to take up.

But to reach wo­men on eco­nom­ic is­sues, the GOP will have to cut through a lot of oth­er noise. “In the mes­saging wars, un­for­tu­nately, we seem to get poun­ded more of­ten than not,” said Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska.

“And in fair­ness, isn’t it about mak­ing sure the policies are right rather than the mes­sage?” Murkowski asked. “Some­times when you try to dis­till the world in­to a bump­er stick­er, it might look good on the bump­er stick­er, but it doesn’t work well for fam­il­ies around the coun­try and work­ers.”

Demo­crats counter that sub­stance is pre­cisely what their wo­men-cent­ric mes­sage is about. “Telling Amer­ic­an wo­men that they don’t de­serve a liv­ing wage isn’t about tone or about how [Re­pub­lic­ans] talk about wo­men’s is­sues, it’s about what they do,” Mur­ray said. “It’s about policy.”

What We're Following See More »
AT LEAST NOT YET
Paul Ryan Can’t Get Behind Trump
1 hours ago
THE LATEST

Paul Ryan told CNN today he's "not ready" to back Donald Trump at this time. "I'm not there right now," he said. Ryan said Trump needs to unify "all wings of the Republican Party and the conservative movement" and then run a campaign that will allow Americans to "have something that they're proud to support and proud to be a part of. And we've got a ways to go from here to there."

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Preet Bharara Learned at the Foot of Chuck Schumer
1 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

In The New Yorker, Jeffrey Toobin gives Preet Bharara, the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, the longread treatment. The scourge of corrupt New York pols, bad actors on Wall Street, and New York gang members, Bharara learned at the foot of Chuck Schumer, the famously limelight-hogging senator whom he served as a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee staff. No surprise then, that after President Obama appointed him, Bharara "brought a media-friendly approach to what has historically been a closed and guarded institution. In professional background, Bharara resembles his predecessors; in style, he’s very different. His personality reflects his dual life in New York’s political and legal firmament. A longtime prosecutor, he sometimes acts like a budding pol; his rhetoric leans more toward the wisecrack than toward the jeremiad. He expresses himself in the orderly paragraphs of a former high-school debater, but with deft comic timing and a gift for shtick."

Source:
DRUG OFFENDERS
Obama Commutes the Sentences of 58 Prisoners
2 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama has announced another round of commutations of prison sentences. Most of the 58 individuals named are incarcerated for possessions with intent to distribute controlled substances. The prisoners will be released between later this year and 2018.

STAFF PICKS
Trump Roadmapped His Candidacy in 2000
3 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The Daily Beast has unearthed a piece that Donald Trump wrote for Gear magazine in 2000, which anticipates his 2016 sales pitch quite well. "Perhaps it's time for a dealmaker who can get the leaders of Congress to the table, forge consensus, and strike compromise," he writes. Oddly, he opens by defending his reputation as a womanizer: "The hypocrites argue that a man who loves and appreciates beautiful women (and does so legally and openly) shouldn't become a national leader? Is there something wrong with appreciating beautiful women? Don't we want people in public office who show signs of life?"

Source:
‘NO MORAL OR ETHICAL GROUNDING’
Sen. Murphy: Trump Shouldn’t Get Classified Briefigs
3 hours ago
THE LATEST
×