Sandra Fluke ‘Strongly Considering’ Run for Henry Waxman’s Seat

The lawyer Rush Limbaugh once called a ‘slut’ is reportedly mulling a congressional campaign.

Sandra Fluke, here a third-year law student at Georgetown University, testifies during a hearing before the House Democratic Steering and Policy Committee in February 2012.
National Journal
Marina Koren
Jan. 30, 2014, 11:27 a.m.

When Henry Wax­man was elec­ted to the House of Rep­res­ent­at­ives, he was 35 years old. Now, at 74, the con­gress­man says he’s ready to pass the torch.

“After 40 years in Con­gress, it’s time for someone else to have the chance to make his or her mark, ideally someone who is young enough to make the long-term com­mit­ment that’s re­quired for real le­gis­lat­ive suc­cess,” he said in a state­ment an­noun­cing his re­tire­ment Thursday.

Just a few hours after news of Wax­man’s de­par­ture broke, a po­ten­tial (and young) can­did­ate has spoken up: Sandra Fluke.

“I’m flattered that I’m be­ing dis­cussed as a po­ten­tial can­did­ate,” Fluke, 32, told KP­CC, a Cali­for­nia ra­dio sta­tion. “A num­ber of folks I re­spect very deeply have reached out today and en­cour­aged me to run. I am strongly con­sid­er­ing run­ning.”

Her name should ring a bell. Two years ago, in Feb­ru­ary, Fluke was barred from testi­fy­ing at a House Over­sight and Gov­ern­ment Re­form Com­mit­tee hear­ing about con­tra­cep­tion. Chair­man Dar­rell Issa said that be­cause Fluke was not a mem­ber of the clergy, she could not ap­pear on the ul­ti­mately all-male pan­el, which was sup­posed to dis­cuss con­tra­cep­tion in re­la­tion to re­li­gious free­dom.

So House Demo­crats con­vened an un­of­fi­cial hear­ing them­selves. Fluke, then a third-year law stu­dent at Geor­getown, spoke in sup­port of the Af­ford­able Care Act’s re­quire­ment that in­sur­ance com­pan­ies cov­er con­tra­cept­ives like birth con­trol.

A few days later, con­ser­vat­ive ra­dio host Rush Limbaugh called her a “slut” on his show.

“What does it say about the col­lege co-ed Susan Fluke [sic] who goes be­fore a con­gres­sion­al com­mit­tee and es­sen­tially says that she must be paid to have sex — what does that make her? It makes her a slut, right?” Limbaugh said. “It makes her a pros­ti­tute. She wants to be paid to have sex. She’s hav­ing so much sex she can’t af­ford the con­tra­cep­tion. She wants you and me and the tax­pay­ers to pay her to have sex.”

In March, a spokes­man for House Speak­er John Boehner, un­der pres­sure from Demo­crat­ic law­makers and con­sid­er­able pub­lic out­cry, said Limbaugh’s com­ments were “in­ap­pro­pri­ate.” Limbaugh even­tu­ally apo­lo­gized for his “word choices.”

Fluke has plenty of time to think about a run, and she’s not the only one. Steve Lopez at the Los Angeles Times sus­pects that Zev Yaroslavsky, a long­time Wax­man polit­ic­al ally who sits on the Los Angeles County Board of Su­per­visors, will soon be vy­ing for Wax­man’s open seat. Bobby Shriver and Sheila Kuehl, who are run­ning to re­place Yaroslavsky on the board, could jump in­to the race, too.

What We're Following See More »
1.5 MILLION MORE TUNED IN FOR TRUMP
More People Watched Trump’s Acceptance Speech
12 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Hillary Clinton hopes that television ratings for the candidates' acceptance speeches at their respective conventions aren't foreshadowing of similar results at the polls in November. Preliminary results from the networks and cable channels show that 34.9 million people tuned in for Donald Trump's acceptance speech while 33.3 million watched Clinton accept the Democratic nomination. However, it is still possible that the numbers are closer than these ratings suggest: the numbers don't include ratings from PBS or CSPAN, which tend to attract more Democratic viewers.

Source:
×