Congressman Waxman Pleads: Don’t Kill the Los Angeles Times

California representative pens a letter of concern to the Times’ owner, saying he believes its parent company may not have the paper’s best interests in mind.

Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif.
National Journal
Marina Koren
Dec. 19, 2013, 12:02 p.m.

The Los Angeles Times, like many big news or­gan­iz­a­tions, is cut­ting hun­dreds of jobs. The move has been dis­tress­ing to journ­al­ists, read­ers and, most re­cently, a con­gress­man.

Henry Wax­man, a Demo­crat­ic rep­res­ent­at­ive for Cali­for­nia’s 33rd dis­trict, ex­pressed con­cern Thursday about the fu­ture of the coun­try’s largest met­ro­pol­it­an daily news­pa­per in a let­ter to the head of its par­ent com­pany, the Tribune Com­pany.

“I am writ­ing on be­half of my con­stitu­ents who rely daily on the Los Angeles Times for their na­tion­al news and loc­al re­port­ing,” Wax­man wrote to Tribune pres­id­ent and CEO Peter Liguori. “I am con­cerned that cor­por­ate ac­tions the Tribune Com­pany is tak­ing may not be in the best in­terests of the Los Angeles Times.”

The let­ter de­tailed the num­ber of lay­offs the news­pa­per has seen each year since 2010, com­plete with foot­notes for the stat­ist­ics. The most re­cent lay­off an­nounce­ment came this Novem­ber, when Tribune said it would slash 700 jobs at the Los Angeles Times over the next year, rep­res­ent­ing a 6-per­cent re­duc­tion in its staff.

Last week, Tribune began pre­par­ing to spin off its en­tire news­pa­per unit and re­quire it to pay the com­pany a cash di­vidend. The unit in­cludes the Cali­for­nia news­pa­per, which must now pay the cor­por­a­tion rent for the pub­lic­a­tion’s own build­ing. This de­vel­op­ment, Wax­man wrote, means “the dif­fi­culties faced by the Los Angeles Times may get worse.”

The con­gress­man knows that ed­it­or­i­al staff cuts have be­come com­mon­place at U.S. news­pa­pers to off­set yearly rev­en­ue losses. However, this spe­cif­ic case seems fishy to him. “The re­quire­ment that the news­pa­per unit go in­to debt to pay a cash di­vidend to the Tribune Com­pany will un­doubtedly en­rich the Tribune Com­pany, but it may do so at the ex­pense of the fin­an­cial health of the Los Angeles Times,” he wrote, not­ing that some have de­scribed the Times‘ rent re­quire­ment “as tan­tamount to ‘life as a cor­por­ate orphan.’”

Wax­man closed his in­quiry with a re­quest to meet with Tribune of­fi­cials. The con­gress­man may not have the bul­ging wal­let and en­tre­pren­eur­i­al know-how of Jeff Bezos, but he ap­pears to be ready for battle to help save his ho­met­own pa­per.

What We're Following See More »
WEST WING REDUX
Allison Janney Takes to the Real White House Podium
26 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

Carolyn Kaster/AP

STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
52 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
1 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
2 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
5 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
×