Nelson Mandela: Loved Universally In Death — But Not In Life

LONDON - JUNE 27: Nelson Mandela appears onstage during the 46664 Concert In Celebration Of Nelson Mandela's Life held at Hyde Park on June 27, 2008 in London, England. (Photo by Gareth Davies/Getty Images)
National Journal
Elahe Izadi
See more stories about...
Elahe Izadi
Dec. 6, 2013, 1:59 a.m.

When Nel­son Man­dela died Thursday in South Africa, the re­mem­brances poured in from across the polit­ic­al spec­trum here in the United States, eu­lo­giz­ing him for pos­sess­ing a saintly char­ac­ter and serving as an in­spir­a­tion for people world­wide.

But the thing is, Man­dela hadn’t been uni­ver­sally revered throughout his life. And in fact, some of those re­mem­brances came from the same groups and in­di­vidu­als who pre­vi­ously had harsh words for the man who had spent 27 years as a polit­ic­al pris­on­er and went on to lead post-apartheid South Africa.

Man­dela had been on the U.S. ter­ror­ist watch-list un­til 2008. In 2003, he de­nounced the U.S.-led Ir­aq war and said the U.S. had com­mit­ted “un­speak­able at­ro­cit­ies in the world.” He vis­ited Fi­del Castro in Cuba shortly after he was re­leased from pris­on, and em­braced then-Palestine Lib­er­a­tion Or­gan­iz­a­tion Chair­man Yass­er Ara­fat and Liby­an dic­tat­or Muam­mar el-Qad­dafi.

All of which meant he was not con­sidered above re­proach by all. In 2003, the Anti-De­fam­a­tion League, for in­stance, called Man­dela’s re­marks against the Ir­aq war and the U.S. “of­fens­ive, pre­ju­di­cial, and simply wrong.” The Amer­ic­an Jew­ish Com­mit­tee can­celed an event hon­or­ing Man­dela in 2000 after com­ments he made about an Ir­a­ni­an tri­al of 13 Jews.

After his death, ADL put out a state­ment, call­ing Man­dela a “true hero of free­dom who brought his­tor­ic change, and did so peace­fully.” AJC’s state­ment said, “We are in­delibly in­spired by his ex­ample and can say of him, as we can say of few oth­ers, that he truly helped re­pair the world.”

ADL did ac­know­ledge its past pos­ture to­ward Man­dela in the state­ment, say­ing that the or­gan­iz­a­tion had dis­agreed with him “from time to time. Those dif­fer­ences, however, did not di­min­ish our re­spect and es­teem for this up­stand­ing mor­al lead­er. Man­dela will be greatly missed, but his leg­acy lives on.”

Man­dela had been sub­jec­ted to scorn in the 1980s and 1990s. Pres­id­ent Re­agan had des­ig­nated the Afric­an Na­tion­al Con­gress as a ter­ror­ist or­gan­iz­a­tion — Man­dela had foun­ded the armed wing of the group. Re­agan then called pro­posed sanc­tions against South Africa “im­mor­al and ut­terly re­pug­nant.” He ve­toed the Com­pre­hens­ive Anti-Apartheid Act, but Con­gress over­rode his veto in 1986 — al­though without the votes of the likes of then-Rep. Dick Cheney. Dur­ing the Cold War, the con­cern among for­eign policy hawks was that the So­viet-backed ANC move­ment would lead to a com­mun­ist coun­try.

Man­dela’s planned vis­it to Miami in the early 1990s after he so fully em­braced Castro caused an out­cry, par­tic­u­larly by Cuban-Amer­ic­an city of­fi­cials who re­voked a pro­clam­a­tion in his hon­or. In later years, Castro and Man­dela main­tained a friend­ship.

But Man­dela’s pos­ture to­ward Cuba didn’t crop up in any state­ments from Amer­ic­an law­makers who are par­tic­u­larly vo­cal on mat­ters re­lated to Cuba. For in­stance, Sen. Marco Ru­bio, R-Fla., said Man­dela’s “ex­ample will live on for gen­er­a­tions to come. Men and wo­men striv­ing for justice and fair­ness around the world have drawn in­spir­a­tion from Nel­son Man­dela, and he showed South Afric­ans and the en­tire world what the power of for­give­ness truly means and can ac­com­plish.”

In­deed, the out­pour­ings came from nearly every level of of­fi­cials, from city may­ors to House speak­ers.

The most en­dur­ing im­age of Man­dela is of a man who helped heal the very pain­ful wounds of his na­tion, choos­ing re­con­cili­ation rather than re­tri­bu­tion. And that is what has giv­en rise to such praise­worthy re­mem­brances from all corners, even if he had geo­pol­it­ic­al ties and views that were at odds with many of those same corners.

It’s a re­flec­tion of how we choose to think of those who have left us, by not dwell­ing on how sharply op­posed we may have been. Es­pe­cially when the one who has left us seems to be lar­ger-than-life.

What We're Following See More »
SHE’LL HAVE A ROLE WITH CLINTON CAMP
Wasserman Schultz to Resign at Week’s End
6 hours ago
THE LATEST

"After hours of private talks," Debbie Wasserman Schultz agreed to step down as chair of the Democratic National Committee after the convention ends. In the wake of the convention intrigue, Hillary Clinton announced she's making Wasserman Schultz "the honorary chair of her campaign's 50-state program."

Source:
MARCIA FUDGE TO PRESIDE
Wasserman Schultz Stripped of Convention Duties
14 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Democratic National Committee Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz "will not have a major speaking role or preside over daily convention proceedings this week," and is under increasing pressure to resign. The DNC Rules Committee on Saturday named Ohio Democratic Rep. Marcia Fudge as "permanent chair of the convention." At issue: internal DNC emails leaked by Wikileaks that show how "the DNC favored Clinton during the primary and tried to take down Bernie Sanders by questioning his religion."

Source:
EARLY BUMP FOR TRUMP?
New Round of Polls Show a Tight Race
2 days ago
THE LATEST
  • A Rasmussen Reports poll shows Donald Trump ahead of Hillary Clinton, 43%-42%, the fourth week in a row he's led the poll (one of the few poll in which he's led consistently of late).
  • A Reuters/Ipsos survey shows Clinton leading 40%-36%. In a four-way race, she maintains her four-point lead, 39%-35%, with Gary Johnson and Jill Stein pulling 7% and 3%, respectively.
  • And the LA Times/USC daily tracking poll shows a dead heat, with Trump ahead by about half a percentage point.
BELLWETHER?
Candidates Deadlocked in Ohio
3 days ago
THE LATEST
17-POINT EDGE AMONG MILLENNIALS
Clinton Dominates Among Younger Voters
3 days ago
THE DETAILS

In an election between two candidates around 70 years of age, millennials strongly prefer one over the other. Hillary Clinton has a 47%-30% edge among votes 18 to 29. She also leads 46%-36% among voters aged 30 to 44.

Source:
×