Cantor Pushing for Bill to Define Iran Deal

House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, R-VA, listens to a speaker during a press conference following a Republican Conference meeting on February 5, 2013 at the US Capitol in Washington, DC.
National Journal
Tim Alberta
Dec. 3, 2013, 6:35 a.m.

House Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Eric Can­tor is at­tempt­ing to or­gan­ize a bi­par­tis­an co­ali­tion to draft a bill that would nar­rowly define what is, and is not, ac­cept­able in any fi­nal nuc­le­ar deal with Ir­an, Na­tion­al Journ­al has learned.

Can­tor, the No. 2 House Re­pub­lic­an and the highest-rank­ing Jew­ish mem­ber of Con­gress, in­formed House Re­pub­lic­ans of his plan at Tues­day morn­ing’s con­fer­ence meet­ing, ac­cord­ing to sources in the room.

“I for one am really up­set with that in­ter­im deal,” Can­tor said, ac­cord­ing to those who were there, adding: “We can go ahead and cri­ti­cize it, but “¦ we should be fo­cused on what that fi­nal deal looks like.”

Can­tor told his GOP col­leagues that he’s work­ing with House For­eign Af­fairs Com­mit­tee Chair­man Ed Royce, R-Cal­if., to find law­makers in both parties to sup­port le­gis­la­tion that would “speak volumes” about con­gres­sion­al ex­pect­a­tions for an agree­ment.

Re­pub­lic­an aides say Can­tor’s ef­fort rep­res­ents the be­gin­ning of what they pre­dict will be a bi­par­tis­an push to “put in writ­ing” ex­actly what Con­gress ex­pects in any fi­nal deal on Ir­an’s nuc­le­ar pro­gram. Spe­cific­ally, one seni­or Re­pub­lic­an aide said, Can­tor’s pref­er­ence is for a fi­nal deal that in­cludes a total pro­hib­i­tion on en­rich­ment.

Can­tor’s of­fice con­firmed his de­sire to pur­sue Ir­an le­gis­la­tion but would not elab­or­ate on de­tails. “The lead­er does not be­lieve the in­ter­im agree­ment with Ir­an was in our na­tion’s best in­terests, and he will work with fel­low mem­bers, Re­pub­lic­an and Demo­crat, to de­term­ine that any fi­nal deal defin­it­ively ad­dresses con­gres­sion­al con­cerns,” Can­tor spokes­man Rory Cooper said.

The ini­tial Ir­an agree­ment, reached late last month, softened some eco­nom­ic sanc­tions in ex­change for Ir­an freez­ing parts of its nuc­le­ar pro­gram. But that deal, de­signed to cre­ate six months of ne­go­ti­at­ing space to reach a broad­er agree­ment, pro­voked a flurry of bi­par­tis­an cri­ti­cism on Cap­it­ol Hill.

The House, which already passed its new round of Ir­an sanc­tions this sum­mer, was ini­tially thought to have little re­course in re­sponse to the Ir­an deal. (It’s un­clear wheth­er the Sen­ate, un­der im­mense pres­sure from the White House not to ap­prove new sanc­tions, will join the House in passing them.)

But neg­at­ive re­sponse to the Ir­an deal from both parties and both cham­bers, Re­pub­lic­an aides say, showed that law­makers are eager to push back against the White House.

With an­oth­er round of sanc­tions on hold, and Sen­ate Demo­crats wary of up­sta­ging Pres­id­ent Obama, Can­tor’s push to define any fi­nal Ir­an agree­ment could be­come the most real­ist­ic vehicle.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Maher Weighs in on Bernie, Trump and Palin
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

“We haven’t seen a true leftist since FDR, so many millions are coming out of the woodwork to vote for Bernie Sanders; he is the Occupy movement now come to life in the political arena.” So says Bill Maher in his Hollywood Reporter cover story (more a stream-of-consciousness riff than an essay, actually). Conservative states may never vote for a socialist in the general election, but “this stuff has never been on the table, and these voters have never been activated.” Maher saves most of his bile for Donald Trump and Sarah Palin, writing that by nominating Palin as vice president “John McCain is the one who opened the Book of the Dead and let the monsters out.” And Trump is picking up where Palin left off.

Source:
×