Countdown to Another Fiscal Fail

Congress braces for brutal choice — more sequester or another shutdown.

WASHINGTON, DC - OCTOBER 17: Members of the bipartisan budget conference (L-R) Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-AL), Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI), Sen. Patty Murray (D-WA) and Rep. Chris Van Hollen (D-MD) discuss their initial meeting at the U.S. Capitol October 17, 2013 in Washington, DC. Congress voted last night to fund the federal budget and increase the nation's debt limit, ending a 16-day government shutdown. 
National Journal
Tim Alberta Sarah Mimms
Dec. 1, 2013, midnight

Law­makers in both parties could face a dan­ger­ous polit­ic­al di­lemma after they re­turn to Wash­ing­ton: Either en­dorse a second round of dam­aging se­quester cuts or pre­pare for an­oth­er gov­ern­ment shut­down.

The situ­ation is that stark, and it’s com­ing on fast.

Budget ne­go­ti­at­ors led by House Budget Com­mit­tee Chair­man Paul Ry­an and Sen­ate Budget Com­mit­tee Chair­wo­man Patty Mur­ray are ra­cing to beat a Dec. 13 dead­line to draft a deal that would keep the gov­ern­ment open bey­ond Jan. 15.

They could get it done. Even House Speak­er John Boehner says he’s hope­ful. But oth­er law­makers and aides say the odds are not good, and that’s why House Re­pub­lic­ans are now pre­pared to pass a short-term con­tinu­ing res­ol­u­tion to fund the gov­ern­ment at the $966 bil­lion level that’s dic­tated by the Budget Con­trol Act, ush­er­ing in round two of the hated se­quester cuts.

“I think there are smarter spend­ing cuts that can re­place these crude across-the-board cuts. I’m hop­ing [Mur­ray] and I can come up with an agree­ment to do that,” Ry­an said re­cently. “But if not, the law is the law.”

The GOP strategy car­ries sig­ni­fic­ant down­side, however. Re­pub­lic­ans want the spend­ing cuts, but this next phase of se­quest­ra­tion in­cludes polit­ic­ally tricky re­duc­tions to Pentagon spend­ing — a $20 bil­lion slash that many law­makers are des­per­ate to stop.

House Re­pub­lic­ans, par­tic­u­larly, could find them­selves in a lose-lose situ­ation. They ac­know­ledge the dam­age done by Oc­to­ber’s shut­down saga and are de­term­ined to avoid a re­peat in Janu­ary, but many GOP law­makers are afraid of cut­ting the Pentagon’s fund­ing.

Enough House Re­pub­lic­ans rep­res­ent mil­it­ary-heavy dis­tricts that any vote framed as sup­port­ing fur­ther se­quest­ra­tion could be un­pre­dict­able for GOP lead­er­ship. Boehner’s team can af­ford to lose only 16 Re­pub­lic­an votes be­fore need­ing help from the oth­er side of the aisle. And giv­en the se­quester’s deep cuts to do­mest­ic pro­grams, sig­ni­fic­ant Demo­crat­ic sup­port for a con­tinu­ing res­ol­u­tion that keeps the auto­mat­ic re­duc­tions in place is un­likely.

One vo­cal GOP op­pon­ent of se­quest­ra­tion, House Ap­pro­pri­ations Com­mit­tee Chair­man Hal Ro­gers, has for months warned his col­leagues against ush­er­ing in a second round of across-the-board cuts. Ro­gers spec­u­lated last week there could be some “se­quester re­lief” in­cluded in a short-term CR, but he did not elab­or­ate on how that would hap­pen.

Mean­while, the Re­pub­lic­an lead­er­ship, while open to re­pla­cing se­quest­ra­tion, has in­creas­ingly in­dic­ated that it will move for­ward with the cuts if Ry­an and Mur­ray can­not reach an agree­ment. Both Boehner and Sen­ate Minor­ity Lead­er Mitch Mc­Con­nell have said that they will push their mem­bers to sup­port the se­quest­ra­tion cuts, ab­sent an agree­ment.

As the Dec. 13 dead­line ap­proaches with no in­dic­a­tion of a deal at hand, even some of the party’s most vo­cal op­pon­ents of se­quest­ra­tion have be­gun to soften their op­pos­i­tion.

“I don’t like it, but I can live with it,” said one Sen­ate Re­pub­lic­an law­maker, who has pre­vi­ously spoken out against the se­quester cuts and asked not to be iden­ti­fied.

Rep. Jack King­ston, R-Ga., a mem­ber of the Ap­pro­pri­ations Com­mit­tee and a vo­cal op­pon­ent of se­quest­ra­tion, said he couldn’t yet agree to a CR that would lock in those deep spend­ing cuts, par­tic­u­larly to the Pentagon.

But he, like many of his Re­pub­lic­an col­leagues, wor­ries that budget ne­go­ti­ations will con­clude on Dec. 13 without a deal. “I don’t know that they’re go­ing to get any­where,” he said.

King­ston’s pref­er­ence would be to get a budget agree­ment and pass 12 ap­pro­pri­ations bills for the re­mainder of the fisc­al year. But ab­sent a deal, King­ston said he would be open to sup­port­ing a con­tinu­ing res­ol­u­tion that locked in se­quest­ra­tion.

“We des­per­ately need to cut spend­ing,” King­ston said. “And se­quest­ra­tion is the only game in town that’s do­ing it.”¦ I would be re­luct­ant to get rid of it without oth­er, sig­ni­fic­ant, spend­ing cuts.”

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
14 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Maher Weighs in on Bernie, Trump and Palin
15 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

“We haven’t seen a true leftist since FDR, so many millions are coming out of the woodwork to vote for Bernie Sanders; he is the Occupy movement now come to life in the political arena.” So says Bill Maher in his Hollywood Reporter cover story (more a stream-of-consciousness riff than an essay, actually). Conservative states may never vote for a socialist in the general election, but “this stuff has never been on the table, and these voters have never been activated.” Maher saves most of his bile for Donald Trump and Sarah Palin, writing that by nominating Palin as vice president “John McCain is the one who opened the Book of the Dead and let the monsters out.” And Trump is picking up where Palin left off.

Source:
×