Countdown to Another Fiscal Fail

Congress braces for brutal choice — more sequester or another shutdown.

WASHINGTON, DC - OCTOBER 17: Members of the bipartisan budget conference (L-R) Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-AL), Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI), Sen. Patty Murray (D-WA) and Rep. Chris Van Hollen (D-MD) discuss their initial meeting at the U.S. Capitol October 17, 2013 in Washington, DC. Congress voted last night to fund the federal budget and increase the nation's debt limit, ending a 16-day government shutdown. 
National Journal
Tim Alberta Sarah Mimms
Dec. 1, 2013, midnight

Law­makers in both parties could face a dan­ger­ous polit­ic­al di­lemma after they re­turn to Wash­ing­ton: Either en­dorse a second round of dam­aging se­quester cuts or pre­pare for an­oth­er gov­ern­ment shut­down.

The situ­ation is that stark, and it’s com­ing on fast.

Budget ne­go­ti­at­ors led by House Budget Com­mit­tee Chair­man Paul Ry­an and Sen­ate Budget Com­mit­tee Chair­wo­man Patty Mur­ray are ra­cing to beat a Dec. 13 dead­line to draft a deal that would keep the gov­ern­ment open bey­ond Jan. 15.

They could get it done. Even House Speak­er John Boehner says he’s hope­ful. But oth­er law­makers and aides say the odds are not good, and that’s why House Re­pub­lic­ans are now pre­pared to pass a short-term con­tinu­ing res­ol­u­tion to fund the gov­ern­ment at the $966 bil­lion level that’s dic­tated by the Budget Con­trol Act, ush­er­ing in round two of the hated se­quester cuts.

“I think there are smarter spend­ing cuts that can re­place these crude across-the-board cuts. I’m hop­ing [Mur­ray] and I can come up with an agree­ment to do that,” Ry­an said re­cently. “But if not, the law is the law.”

The GOP strategy car­ries sig­ni­fic­ant down­side, however. Re­pub­lic­ans want the spend­ing cuts, but this next phase of se­quest­ra­tion in­cludes polit­ic­ally tricky re­duc­tions to Pentagon spend­ing — a $20 bil­lion slash that many law­makers are des­per­ate to stop.

House Re­pub­lic­ans, par­tic­u­larly, could find them­selves in a lose-lose situ­ation. They ac­know­ledge the dam­age done by Oc­to­ber’s shut­down saga and are de­term­ined to avoid a re­peat in Janu­ary, but many GOP law­makers are afraid of cut­ting the Pentagon’s fund­ing.

Enough House Re­pub­lic­ans rep­res­ent mil­it­ary-heavy dis­tricts that any vote framed as sup­port­ing fur­ther se­quest­ra­tion could be un­pre­dict­able for GOP lead­er­ship. Boehner’s team can af­ford to lose only 16 Re­pub­lic­an votes be­fore need­ing help from the oth­er side of the aisle. And giv­en the se­quester’s deep cuts to do­mest­ic pro­grams, sig­ni­fic­ant Demo­crat­ic sup­port for a con­tinu­ing res­ol­u­tion that keeps the auto­mat­ic re­duc­tions in place is un­likely.

One vo­cal GOP op­pon­ent of se­quest­ra­tion, House Ap­pro­pri­ations Com­mit­tee Chair­man Hal Ro­gers, has for months warned his col­leagues against ush­er­ing in a second round of across-the-board cuts. Ro­gers spec­u­lated last week there could be some “se­quester re­lief” in­cluded in a short-term CR, but he did not elab­or­ate on how that would hap­pen.

Mean­while, the Re­pub­lic­an lead­er­ship, while open to re­pla­cing se­quest­ra­tion, has in­creas­ingly in­dic­ated that it will move for­ward with the cuts if Ry­an and Mur­ray can­not reach an agree­ment. Both Boehner and Sen­ate Minor­ity Lead­er Mitch Mc­Con­nell have said that they will push their mem­bers to sup­port the se­quest­ra­tion cuts, ab­sent an agree­ment.

As the Dec. 13 dead­line ap­proaches with no in­dic­a­tion of a deal at hand, even some of the party’s most vo­cal op­pon­ents of se­quest­ra­tion have be­gun to soften their op­pos­i­tion.

“I don’t like it, but I can live with it,” said one Sen­ate Re­pub­lic­an law­maker, who has pre­vi­ously spoken out against the se­quester cuts and asked not to be iden­ti­fied.

Rep. Jack King­ston, R-Ga., a mem­ber of the Ap­pro­pri­ations Com­mit­tee and a vo­cal op­pon­ent of se­quest­ra­tion, said he couldn’t yet agree to a CR that would lock in those deep spend­ing cuts, par­tic­u­larly to the Pentagon.

But he, like many of his Re­pub­lic­an col­leagues, wor­ries that budget ne­go­ti­ations will con­clude on Dec. 13 without a deal. “I don’t know that they’re go­ing to get any­where,” he said.

King­ston’s pref­er­ence would be to get a budget agree­ment and pass 12 ap­pro­pri­ations bills for the re­mainder of the fisc­al year. But ab­sent a deal, King­ston said he would be open to sup­port­ing a con­tinu­ing res­ol­u­tion that locked in se­quest­ra­tion.

“We des­per­ately need to cut spend­ing,” King­ston said. “And se­quest­ra­tion is the only game in town that’s do­ing it.”¦ I would be re­luct­ant to get rid of it without oth­er, sig­ni­fic­ant, spend­ing cuts.”

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
18 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
19 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
20 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
22 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
CITIZENS UNITED PT. 2?
Movie Based on ‘Clinton Cash’ to Debut at Cannes
23 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."

Source:
×