SUPREME COURT

Thomas's Wife Seeks Apology From Hill

Hill accused Thomas of sexual harassment during his 1991 Supreme Court confirmation hearing.

Updated: October 25, 2010 | 12:40 a.m.
October 20, 2010 | 7:28 a.m.

Virginia Thomas, seen here at her husband Clarence's Supreme Court confirmation hearing, left a voice mail for Anita Hill, the woman who accused him of sexual harassment, seeking an apology. (Jennifer Law/AFP/Getty Images)

After almost 20 years, the wife of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas picked up the phone and called the woman who accused her husband of sexual harassment during a contentious confirmation hearing that captivated the nation, ABC News reports.

Virginia Thomas left a voice mail, seeking an apology from Anita Hill. “Good morning, Anita Hill, it’s Ginny Thomas,” said the voice mail, which was obtained by ABC. “I just wanted to reach across the airwaves and the years and ask you to consider something. I would love you to consider an apology sometime and some full explanation of why you did what you did with my husband. So give it some thought and certainly pray about this and come to understand why you did what you did. OK, have a good day."

Thinking the call was a prank, Hill -- who is now a professor of social policy, law, and women’s studies at Brandeis University -- reported the call to the police, where it caught the attention of Mark Matthews at ABC affiliate KGO in San Francisco. The police, in turn, passed the message on to the FBI.

Matthews contacted Thomas, who said her voice mail was a peace offering.

“I did place a call to Ms. Hill at her office extending an olive branch to her after all these years, in hopes that we could ultimately get passed [sic] what happened so long ago,” Thomas told Matthews in an e-mail. “That offer still stands, I would be very happy to meet and talk with her if she would be willing to do the same. Certainly no offense was ever intended.”

But Hill only saw confrontation in the message because it presumes she has something to apologize for. “I simply testified to the truth of my experience,” Hill told ABC. “For her to say otherwise is not extending an olive branch, it’s accusatory. I don’t apologize. I have no intention of apologizing, and I stand by my testimony in 1991.”

Hill testified during the confirmation hearings that Thomas made inappropriate sexual remarks to her when she worked for him at the Education Department and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, a decade before Thomas was nominated to the high court. Thomas vigorously denied the allegations, calling his confirmation process a “high-tech lynching.”

This isn’t the first time Virginia Thomas has sought an apology from Hill. In an October 2007 interview on ABC’s Good Morning America, she said, “I'm sure she got swept up into something bigger than she may have understood at the beginning of whatever she was doing, but I think she owes us an apology, and I look forward to receiving that phone call or that visit one day.” The interview was conducted after the release of Clarence Thomas’s memoir, My Grandfather’s Son, in which he attacked Hill for her testimony, calling her a “mediocre” employee and a product of political opposition to his appointment.

Virginia Thomas made news again last year, when she launched a conservative think tank and advocacy group called Liberty Central, which provides support for the tea party movement.

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Related Content
Expert Opinions
Transportation Experts

Oops! Judge Slams Local Public-Private Deal

May 17, 2013

Latest Response by Robert L. Darbelnet: Public Scrutiny Essential

Energy Experts

Should Washington Go Small on Energy and Climate Policy?

May 17, 2013

Latest Response by Jack Gerard: Minor Policies, Major Consequences

Energy Experts

Should Washington Go Small on Energy and Climate Policy?

May 16, 2013

Latest Response by Jonathan Silver: Woefully Little, Better Than Nothing

More Expert Opinions »

Columns
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

How the White House Scandals Could Hurt Republicans, Too

May 16, 2013
By enraging the base and strengthening the faction least willing to compromise with Obama, the IRS and Benghazi affairs could hurt a GOP shot at the presidency.
Norm Ornstein: Washington Inside Out

Eric Cantor’s Caucus Thwarts His Push for an Alternative Agenda

May 16, 2013
Cantor has learned that the tea-party movement he helped foster won’t fall in line behind his efforts to push an alternative conservative agenda.
More Columns »