WHITE HOUSE

White House to Announce Contraception Compromise As Early As Friday

Updated: February 10, 2012 | 9:38 a.m.
February 10, 2012 | 9:36 a.m.

The White House will announce as early as Friday a new position on a Health and Human Services regulation requiring that virtually all employers—including large religious institutions who oppose doing so—provide health insurance coverage for a wide-range of contraception services.

Two senior administration officials confirmed the move will be crafted to quell an uproar among the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops and prominent Republicans in Congress and those seeking the party's presidential nomination. 

The compromise could be based on "what exists in a majority of states, like in Illinois where DePaul University, the largest Catholic university in the country, offers an employee health plan that does cover contraception," CBS News reported. A possible compromise may also give employers an out by having insurance companies reach out directly to the women, according to ABC News.

Vice President Joe Biden hinted at the compromise in a Thursday interview with a Cincinnati radio station, saying "as a practicing Catholic, I am of the view that this can be worked out and should be worked out. I know the president feels the same way."

Whether the new language will appease Catholics remains unclear. Two senior officials cautioned that the underlying substance of the contraceptive-coverage regulation, due to take full effect in the summer of 2013, remains unclear in the public mind and any new approach may not mollify critics in the Catholic hierarchy or on the GOP campaign trail. The officials spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the announcement.

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Related Content
Expert Opinions
Energy Experts

What's at Stake with Natural-Gas Exports?

7:33 a.m.

Latest Response by Michael Schmidt: Debate is Microcosm of Energy Policy

Energy Experts

What's at Stake with Natural-Gas Exports?

6:25 p.m.

Latest Response by Jack Rafuse: The LNG Export Conundrum: Dow Chemical

Energy Experts

What's at Stake with Natural-Gas Exports?

4:23 p.m.

Latest Response by Bernard L. Weinstein: Export more LNG to fight climate change

More Expert Opinions »

Columns
Charlie Cook: Off to the Races

Republicans’ Hatred of Obama Blinds Them to Public Disinterest in Scandals

May 20, 2013
Republicans are so focused on their bitter battles against Obama, they can’t see how little impact the “scandals” have had on public opinion.
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

How the White House Scandals Could Hurt Republicans, Too

May 16, 2013
By enraging the base and strengthening the faction least willing to compromise with Obama, the IRS and Benghazi affairs could hurt a GOP shot at the presidency.
More Columns »