BUDGET

White House: Obama Will Veto One-Week Spending Bill

Updated: April 7, 2011 | 1:49 p.m.
April 7, 2011 | 12:31 p.m.

The White House said point blank on Thursday that President Obama will veto H.R. 1363, the one-week government spending bill in the House that would fund defense spending through the end of fiscal 2011.

“This bill is a distraction from the real work that would bring us closer to a reasonable compromise for funding the remainder of Fiscal Year 2011 and avert a disruptive federal government shutdown that would put the nation’s economic recovery in jeopardy,” said a pointed statement of administration policy released midday Thursday.

With talks continuing for a spending resolution for the rest of the year, the statement said Obama would support a “clean” short-term continuing resolution to accommodate the passage of a longer-term deal.

Senate Democrats and the White House object to a provision in the bill that bans the use of federal and local government funds for abortions in the District of Columbia.

Critics of the measure have also challenged Republican assertions that the bill cuts $12 billion from current levels because it adds $7.6 billion to the Pentagon budget, totaling only $4.4 billion in cuts, according a statement from Steve Ellis, vice president of the nonprofit Taxpayers for Common Sense.

In a prompt statement, House Speaker John Boehner criticized the White House for issuing the veto threat without "stating a single policy justification."

"The bill the House is considering today would fund our troops through September in the face of three conflicts and keep the government from shutting down tomorrow, while reflecting meaningful reductions in government spending that are widely accepted by both chambers of Congress." Boehner said. “We will send this bill to the Senate today, confident that those Democrats who believe it is important to fund our troops and make real spending cuts will prevail upon Senator Reid and our Commander-in-Chief to keep the government from shutting down."

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Related Content
Expert Opinions
Energy Experts

What's at Stake with Natural-Gas Exports?

20 minutes ago

Latest Response by Paul Sullivan: TBD

Energy Experts

What's at Stake with Natural-Gas Exports?

11:00 a.m.

Latest Response by Jonathan Silver: Nat Gas: Exports are Not the Only Issue

Energy Experts

What's at Stake with Natural-Gas Exports?

10:58 a.m.

Latest Response by Jonathan Silver: Nat Gas: Exports are Not the Only Issue

More Expert Opinions »

Columns
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

How the White House Scandals Could Hurt Republicans, Too

May 16, 2013
By enraging the base and strengthening the faction least willing to compromise with Obama, the IRS and Benghazi affairs could hurt a GOP shot at the presidency.
Norm Ornstein: Washington Inside Out

Eric Cantor’s Caucus Thwarts His Push for an Alternative Agenda

May 16, 2013
Cantor has learned that the tea-party movement he helped foster won’t fall in line behind his efforts to push an alternative conservative agenda.
More Columns »