WHITE HOUSE

White House Indicates Possible Flexibility on Contraception Rules

Updated: February 7, 2012 | 5:36 p.m.
February 7, 2012 | 3:55 p.m.

White House press secretary Jay Carney said on Tuesday that the administration will work to allay the concerns of church-affiliated organizations over a new birth control coverage requirement, but he indicated that the administration doesn't plan to reconsider the requirement itself.

"We will be working with those organizations and individuals who have concerns" during the implementation period between now and August 2013, Carney said. Catholic universities and hospitals are among the organizations that have opposed a new rule requiring insurance policies to cover women’s contraceptive services.

"There are a lot of different ideas out there,” Carney said of possible White House flexibility on the rule. He added, "I'm not going to predict, because I don't know, all the various possibilities those discussions will entertain."

Carney didn't say if any new exemptions for church-affiliated organizations were under consideration. An exemption currently exists for churches and other houses of worship.

"The president's interest, at a policy level, is making sure that this coverage is extended to all women," Carney said.

Carney's comments came after White House adviser David Axelrod said on Tuesday morning that the administration is willing to work with Catholic universities and hospitals to make sure the new rules don't infringe on religious liberties.

“We certainly don't want to abridge anyone's religious freedom,” Axelrod said on MSNBC’s Morning Joe. The president and the administration will move forward, "but with a grace period,” Axelrod said. Carney said that the "grace period" Axelrod mentioned was nothing new, and had been part of the implementation policy all along.

Both Axelrod and Carney noted that, while institutions like churches tend to employ people of the same faith, large organizations like hospitals tend to employ people of many faiths—including women who might not share the Catholic canonical opposition to artificial birth control.

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Related Content
Expert Opinions
Transportation Experts

Oops! Judge Slams Local Public-Private Deal

7:05 p.m.

Latest Response by Robert L. Darbelnet: Public Scrutiny Essential

Energy Experts

Should Washington Go Small on Energy and Climate Policy?

May 17, 2013

Latest Response by Jack Gerard: Minor Policies, Major Consequences

Energy Experts

Should Washington Go Small on Energy and Climate Policy?

May 16, 2013

Latest Response by Jonathan Silver: Woefully Little, Better Than Nothing

More Expert Opinions »
Columns
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

How the White House Scandals Could Hurt Republicans, Too

May 16, 2013
By enraging the base and strengthening the faction least willing to compromise with Obama, the IRS and Benghazi affairs could hurt a GOP shot at the presidency.
Norm Ornstein: Washington Inside Out

Eric Cantor’s Caucus Thwarts His Push for an Alternative Agenda

May 16, 2013
Cantor has learned that the tea-party movement he helped foster won’t fall in line behind his efforts to push an alternative conservative agenda.
More Columns »