The Next Treasury Secretary Doesn’t Trust Wall Street With His Own Money

Updated: January 16, 2013 | 1:49 p.m.
January 16, 2013 | 1:17 p.m.

Jacob Lew's financial disclosure reveals a low-cost, low-management investment strategy. Lew (left) is President Obama's nominee to replace Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner (right). (AP Photo/Susan Walsh) ()

Jacob Lew, the White House chief of staff whom President Obama nominated to replace Timothy Geithner as Treasury secretary, is considered a change of pace for the department: He is known as a budget wonk and political fixer, not a financial-markets expert like Geithner.



Latest from Quartz:
Loading feed...

Despite, or perhaps because of, a lucrative stint at Citigroup as senior operations manager for one of the bank’s riskiest units, Lew’s 2011 financial disclosure form (pdf), helpfully pulled from the bureaucracy by our own David Yanofsky, reveals an investment strategy predicated on low-cost, low-management assets that don’t divert a lot of money to bankers’ pockets.

Most of his retirement investments, between $600,000 and $1.3 million, are managed by TIAA-CREF, the nonprofit organization originally founded by turn-of-the-20th-century tycoon Andrew Carnegie to provide for the retirement of teachers. (The disclosure form doesn’t specify actual sums, just ranges.) Nowadays, TIAA-CREF is a massive asset manager, but it is still a nonprofit focused on people in “service” professions—teachers, academics, researchers, etc. Lew likely began taking advantage of the organization’s low-cost offerings during his career as a congressional staffer.

The bulk of his remaining investments, $266,000 to $665,000, are in low-cost index funds. Rather than pay high fees for fund managers, Lew has purchased exchange-traded funds that invest in a broad range of equities, rising and falling with the markets. These kinds of investments are increasingly popular for investors looking for profit at a time of scarce returns: After all, an investment in an S&P 500 index 10 years ago would have significantly outperformed an investment in hedge funds during the same period. 

Does he trust Israel’s fiscal management more than America’s? Unlikely, but Lew likely owns far more Israeli government bonds than U.S. Treasuries (though some U.S. bonds may be part of his TIAA-CREF retirement funds). Lew is an Orthodox Jew known for his observance of the Sabbath, so it’s probably no surprise that he has made a significant investment in support of Israel’s government. Then again, maybe it’s a commentary on the admired monetary policy of Stanley Fischer, the governor of Israel’s central bank, who also supervised Federal Reserve Board Chairman Ben Bernanke’s Ph.D. thesis.

As more retail investors are becoming cognizant of the high cost of management fees in a low-interest-rate world — see online broker E-Trade’s new ad campaign highlighting just that — Lew may be ahead of the curve. Too bad he’s likely to be too busy figuring out this whole debt ceiling mess to bring that attitude to financial regulation.

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Expert Opinions
Energy Experts

What's at Stake with Natural-Gas Exports?

39 minutes ago

Latest Response by Tim Peckinpaugh: LNG Exports: Let the Market Decide

Education Experts

New Definition of Asperger's, Autism for Kids

40 minutes ago

Latest Response by Gina Burkhardt: To Label or Not to Label?

Energy Experts

What's at Stake with Natural-Gas Exports?

7:33 a.m.

Latest Response by Michael Schmidt: Debate is Microcosm of Energy Policy

More Expert Opinions »
Columns
Charlie Cook: Off to the Races

Republicans’ Hatred of Obama Blinds Them to Public Disinterest in Scandals

May 20, 2013
Republicans are so focused on their bitter battles against Obama, they can’t see how little impact the “scandals” have had on public opinion.
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

How the White House Scandals Could Hurt Republicans, Too

May 16, 2013
By enraging the base and strengthening the faction least willing to compromise with Obama, the IRS and Benghazi affairs could hurt a GOP shot at the presidency.
More Columns »