CONGRESS

Senate Blocks First Piece of Obama's Jobs Proposals

Updated: October 21, 2011 | 11:18 a.m.
October 21, 2011 | 7:19 a.m.

It seems "bite-sized" doesn't make a bit of difference.

President Obama on Thursday night failed to gain the 60 Senate votes needed to pass his proposal to fund states and local agencies with $35 billion to retain teachers and first responders. The bill was a piece of Obama's American Jobs Act, which was blocked by a Republican filibuster when proposed in its entirety last week.

The vote was the administration's first attempt at proposing the bill one piece at a time, a strategy designed to record Republican votes on individual issues.

The White House issued a statement following the vote, blaming Republicans for blocking job growth: "Every American deserves an explanation as to why Republicans refuse to step up to the plate and do what’s necessary to create jobs and grow the economy right now."

But the outcome was no surprise. Senate Republicans began criticizing the bill's emphasis of public jobs over private jobs as soon as Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., proposed the bill on Wednesday. Many took issue with Reid's statement that "the private sector is doing just fine." Senate Finance Committee ranking member Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, called the focus on government jobs to create economic growth “plain ridiculous.”

“We need to liberate the American people—our job creators and middle-class families—from too much government, too much spending, too much regulation and the threat of higher taxes that is weighing down the prospects of a real economic recovery,” Hatch said.

A bill proposed by Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., also failed to win a 60-vote majority on Thursday night. The bill, opposed by the White House because it would be paid for by spending cuts, would have eliminated a rule that allows government agencies to withhold 3 percent of payments to contractors.

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Related Content
Most Read Articles
Expert Opinions
Transportation Experts

Oops! Judge Slams Local Public-Private Deal

May 17, 2013

Latest Response by Robert L. Darbelnet: Public Scrutiny Essential

Energy Experts

Should Washington Go Small on Energy and Climate Policy?

May 17, 2013

Latest Response by Jack Gerard: Minor Policies, Major Consequences

Energy Experts

Should Washington Go Small on Energy and Climate Policy?

May 16, 2013

Latest Response by Jonathan Silver: Woefully Little, Better Than Nothing

More Expert Opinions »
Columns
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

How the White House Scandals Could Hurt Republicans, Too

May 16, 2013
By enraging the base and strengthening the faction least willing to compromise with Obama, the IRS and Benghazi affairs could hurt a GOP shot at the presidency.
Norm Ornstein: Washington Inside Out

Eric Cantor’s Caucus Thwarts His Push for an Alternative Agenda

May 16, 2013
Cantor has learned that the tea-party movement he helped foster won’t fall in line behind his efforts to push an alternative conservative agenda.
More Columns »