Rice Withdraws from Secretary of State Consideration

Updated: December 13, 2012 | 5:59 p.m.
December 13, 2012 | 4:14 p.m.

United Nations Ambassador Susan Rice (AP Photo/Ron Edmonds)

After months of criticism for her response to the terrorist attack in Benghazi, U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice has withdrawn her name from consideration for secretary of state, the White House said on Thursday.

Amid heavy pressure from Republican opponents and potential political backlash if she were nominated to succeed Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, Rice said in a letter to President Obama that she wanted to avoid a distraction.

“The position of secretary of State should never be politicized,” she said in the letter. “As someone who grew up in an era of comparative bipartisanship and as a sitting U.S. national-security official who has served in two U.S. administrations, I am saddened that we have reached this point, even before you have decided whom to nominate. We cannot afford such an irresponsible distraction from the most pressing issues facing the American people.”

Rice said she was convinced that a confirmation process for her would be “lengthy, disruptive and costly — to you and to our most pressing national and international priorities. That trade-off is simply not worth it to our country."

Obama said in a statement that Rice was “an extraordinarily capable, patriotic, and passionate public servant,” and said she had been attacked unfairly.

“While I deeply regret the unfair and misleading attacks on Susan Rice in recent weeks, her decision demonstrates the strength of her character, and an admirable commitment to rise above the politics of the moment to put our national interests first,” Obama said in a statement. “The American people can be proud to have a public servant of her caliber and character representing our country.”

Congressional Republicans, including Senate Armed Services ranking member John McCain, R-Ariz., and Sens. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., and Kelly Ayotte, R-N.H., have for months decried the Obama administration’s changing account of the attack on the U.S. compound in Benghazi. And despite meeting with her critics, she failed to ease their concerns.

Whether a Rice nomination would be able to pass the Senate was in question, with Republicans blasting Rice’s appearance on television shows in which she said the Sept. 11 attack began as a spontaneous protest linked to anger over an anti-Muslim film, instead of calling it a terrorist attack.

The announcement means that the other top contender for the post, Senate Foreign Relations Chairman John Kerry, D-Mass., may have a clearer shot. However, if Kerry leaves the chamber, fellow Massachusetts Sen. Scott Brown, a Republican, would have the opportunity to win the state's other Senate seat after his loss to Democrat Elizabeth Warren in the November elections. Democrats, having already spent almost $40 million to defeat Brown, may not be able to overcome him in a special election.

Kerry, for his part, had kind words for Rice — and made no mention of his possible accession to the post. “I've defended her publicly and wouldn't hesitate to do so again, because I know her character and I know her commitment," Kerry said. "She's an extraordinarily capable and dedicated public servant. Today’s announcement doesn't change any of that. We should all be grateful that she will continue to serve and contribute at the highest level."

Kerry said he sympathized with Rice as someone who has also weathered what he called political attacks. "But I also know that she will continue to serve with great passion and distinction.”

NBC News first reported her decision. Rice will also appear on Rock Center with Brian Williams on Thursday night.

 

Susan Rice's Letter to President Obama:

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Related Content
Expert Opinions
Transportation Experts

Do We Suddenly Hate Driving?

10:43 p.m.

Latest Response by Gabriel Roth: But do we not drive to save time?

Energy Experts

What's at Stake with Natural-Gas Exports?

4:49 p.m.

Latest Response by Dave McCurdy: Natural Gas Market Will Find Balance

Transportation Experts

Do We Suddenly Hate Driving?

4:24 p.m.

Latest Response by Keith Laughlin: We Need a New Policy for a New Day

More Expert Opinions »
Columns
Norm Ornstein: Washington Inside Out

GOP’s Switch on Financial Disclosure Wins Gold Medal in Hypocrisy Olympics

9:30 p.m.
The IRS scandal evolved from the broader reality that the GOP has changed its financing mantra from “disclosure” to “secrecy.”
Major Garrett: All Powers

Obama Pushes to Accommodate, Not Protect, Freedom of the Press

May 21, 2013
The Justice Department’s secret subpoena of AP phone logs begs questions about Obama’s attitude toward the First Amendment and government scrutiny.
Charlie Cook: Off to the Races

Republicans’ Hatred of Obama Blinds Them to Public Disinterest in Scandals

May 20, 2013
Republicans are so focused on their bitter battles against Obama, they can’t see how little impact the “scandals” have had on public opinion.
More Columns »