WHITE HOUSE

Presidential Vacation Criticism Is as Old as Washington

Updated: August 18, 2011 | 7:23 p.m.
August 18, 2011 | 6:00 a.m.

Former President Bill Clinton retreated to Martha's Vineyard in August 1999 for a relaxing vacation, but didn't do so well during a round of golf. (Paul J. Richards/AFP/Getty Images)

It's vacation time for President Obama. So cue the critics and listen to the echoes of history in their complaints. You'll hear that this vacation is too long. Or too lavish. Or too insensitive. Or too far removed from the struggles of average Americans.

From National Journal:
Where Presidents Go on Vacation


First Family Won’t Leave Controversy Behind

Libya's Rebels Reopen Embassy in Washington

VIDEO: Perry is Skeptical of Global-Warming

15 Things You Didn't Know About Congress

In the two centuries since John Adams was the first president to seek solace outside Washington and the 109 years since Theodore Roosevelt invented the modern presidential vacation, the critics have always been there to attack. Now, it's Obama’s turn to weather the storm.

From his arrival Thursday on Martha’s Vineyard in Massachusetts until he returns on August 27, Obama will be seen mostly in full relaxation mode, buying ice cream for his daughters, browsing in book stores, riding a bike, and hitting the beach. And with each sighting will almost certainly come lamentations from the critics -- the media, political opponents, nervous supporters -- that he should be back in the White House tending to the nation’s business. Like all his modern predecessors, his aides will defend him, insisting that the business and the trappings of office travel with him.

In contrast to some of those predecessors, though, no one will be able to accuse Obama of using Navy battleships and submarines, Army dirigibles, or Air Force planes to enhance his vacation enjoyment. There was always criticism; but in the past, there were also some vacation perks that went with being commander in chief.

Before July 5, 1902, no president pretended that a vacation trip was anything other than a vacation. When John Adams spent seven months at his Quincy, Mass., farm in 1798, he was accused of abdicating his office and Congress tried to take advantage of his lengthy absence to push for a war with France. The criticism helped undercut his bid for a second term. James Madison celebrated the end of the War of 1812 by staying away from Washington for four months – from June until October 1816. Thomas Jefferson went home from July until October in 1805.

But no president claimed he was on a “working” vacation until that summer day in 1902 when a special presidential train took Theodore Roosevelt to his home in Oyster Bay, N.Y. Later there was to be Harry Truman’s “Little White House” in Key West, Fla., Richard Nixon’s “Florida White House” in Key Biscayne, and George W. Bush’s “Western White House” in Texas. But Roosevelt’s “Summer White House” in Oyster Bay was the first vacation home to carry the White House moniker. And he was the first president to bring staff with him.

It was, declares historian Lawrence L. Knutson and the White House Historical Association, the trip that “forever transformed the nature of the presidential vacation.” Roosevelt brought with him, wrote Knutson, aides, “a platoon of reporters,” and a large number of “stenographers, typists, telegraphers and messengers.” All were stuffed into makeshift quarters they shared with a dentist named Dr. W.C. Root over the Oyster Bay Bank. A newspaper cartoon showed Roosevelt riding off with an uprooted White House and a sign declaring “White House: Gone to Oyster Bay, Back in the Fall.” The critics roared, but The New York Times defended the long vacation, saying it “will be good for him and good for all of us.”

It was on that vacation that Roosevelt coined the term “bully pulpit” and brushed aside concerns about his vacation safety so soon after his predecessor was assassinated. He insisted on ditching the Secret Service, explaining he was carrying a revolver and could protect himself. He also sought his own amusement, at one point going to Long Island Sound where the torpedo submarine USS Plunger was berthed. For 55 minutes, he was the first president ever to be submerged in a sub. For this, The New York Times spanked him for risking his life in “some new-fangled, submersible, collapsible or other dangerous device.”

Twenty-nine years later, Herbert Hoover sought the Navy’s help to give him some respite during the depths of the Depression. Almost on the spur of the moment, the White House announced in March 1931 that “to secure a short rest” Hoover was going to Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. Somewhat defensively, the announcement noted “this will be the first vacation of the president since assuming office with the exception of a seven-day fishing trip to Florida something more than a year ago.” His mode of transportation was to be the newly modernized battleship Arizona. It's trial run became a luxury cruise for the president.

Time magazine described Hoover as “a very tired man” at the outset of the cruise. But after many “long naps,” exercise on the deck with a medicine ball, and dinners (in formal wear) accompanied by an orchestra, Hoover was rejuvenated. Time described him as “a new man physically ... his cheeks were a pinkish tan (and) lines around his eyes had been smoothed out.”  To keep him in touch with the White House, an Army blimp was used daily to shuttle mail from Washington to be dropped in bags on the deck of the Arizona.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Expert Opinions
Transportation Experts

Oops! Judge Slams Local Public-Private Deal

May 17, 2013

Latest Response by Robert L. Darbelnet: Public Scrutiny Essential

Energy Experts

Should Washington Go Small on Energy and Climate Policy?

May 17, 2013

Latest Response by Jack Gerard: Minor Policies, Major Consequences

Energy Experts

Should Washington Go Small on Energy and Climate Policy?

May 16, 2013

Latest Response by Jonathan Silver: Woefully Little, Better Than Nothing

More Expert Opinions »
Columns
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

How the White House Scandals Could Hurt Republicans, Too

May 16, 2013
By enraging the base and strengthening the faction least willing to compromise with Obama, the IRS and Benghazi affairs could hurt a GOP shot at the presidency.
Norm Ornstein: Washington Inside Out

Eric Cantor’s Caucus Thwarts His Push for an Alternative Agenda

May 16, 2013
Cantor has learned that the tea-party movement he helped foster won’t fall in line behind his efforts to push an alternative conservative agenda.
More Columns »