WHITE HOUSE

Obama Unveils Housing Plan to Help Veterans, Boost Refinancing

Updated: March 6, 2012 | 1:53 p.m.
March 6, 2012 | 12:39 p.m.

President Obama speaks during a news conference in the James Brady Press Briefing Room of the White House on Tuesday. (Charles Dharapak/AP)

President Obama tried to upstage the Super Tuesday primaries with housing announcements, including a plan to help military personnel who lose their homes through improper foreclosures.

Obama also put forward an idea for reducing refinancing costs for borrowers with government loans. The administration has turned up its rhetoric and sought more aggressive action in recent months in an effort to lower mortgage costs and hold the financial industry accountable.

“We are going to do this on our own. We don’t need congressional authorization to do it," the president told a news conference. "It is unconscionable that members of our armed forces and their families have been some of those most susceptible to losing their homes through the actions of unscrupulous banks and housing lenders."

Obama’s announcements include new details about a recently agreed $25 billion mortgage servicing settlement with the top five lenders that includes a special review through the Justice Department of “every servicemember foreclosed upon since 2006,” according to a White House fact sheet.

Under the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act, lenders cannot foreclose on active-duty military members and their families or charge them interest rates of more than 6 percent on preexisting debt. Some of the biggest lenders have already tried to rectify some of their violations of this law, but the administration’s announcement attempts to guarantee review and relief.

The review process would “provide any who were wrongly foreclosed upon with compensation equal to a minimum of lost equity, plus interest and $116,785,” paid for by the settlement, and provide additional protections and compensation for other abuses related to handling mortgages of military members, the White House document said.

The Obama administration has recently made several administrative changes to enhance existing housing programs, developed a new mortgage fraud working group, and called for legislation to streamline more refinancing. Although the administration’s track record on housing has been sharply criticized as underwhelming, the White House is hoping it can highlight the issue to distinguish Obama from any Republican challengers. The sluggish housing sector continues to hamper economic recovery and more than 11 million homeowners owe more than their homes are worth.

The other housing announcement has to do with an effort to encourage borrowers to refinance into lower interest rates. The administration is making changes to lower refinancing costs for borrowers with loans backed by the Federal Housing Administration—a government mortgage insurance program that offers low-down-payment mortgages targeted to first-time and low- and moderate-income borrowers.

The White House said it is reducing up-front mortgage insurance premiums and annual fees for borrowers with FHA loans so that roughly 2 million to 3 million borrowers could save an average about $1,000 per year, in addition to the savings from refinancing.

"There are real things we can do right now to make differences in the lives of innocent, responsible homeowners," Obama said.

“If you’ve acted responsibly, you should have a chance to save that money on your home." The White House fact sheet said the plan would save homeowners an average of $1,000 a year.

Analysts said they did not have enough details to fully gauge how big an impact the initiatives could make on the market, but said they expected there would be positive, if modest, additional measures for homeowners.

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


More By This Writer
Stacy Kaper's Pic
Stacy Kaper | Staff Writer, Economics
skaper@nationaljournal.com
Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Related Content
Expert Opinions
Transportation Experts

Oops! Judge Slams Local Public-Private Deal

May 17, 2013

Latest Response by Robert L. Darbelnet: Public Scrutiny Essential

Energy Experts

Should Washington Go Small on Energy and Climate Policy?

May 17, 2013

Latest Response by Jack Gerard: Minor Policies, Major Consequences

Energy Experts

Should Washington Go Small on Energy and Climate Policy?

May 16, 2013

Latest Response by Jonathan Silver: Woefully Little, Better Than Nothing

More Expert Opinions »
Columns
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

How the White House Scandals Could Hurt Republicans, Too

May 16, 2013
By enraging the base and strengthening the faction least willing to compromise with Obama, the IRS and Benghazi affairs could hurt a GOP shot at the presidency.
Norm Ornstein: Washington Inside Out

Eric Cantor’s Caucus Thwarts His Push for an Alternative Agenda

May 16, 2013
Cantor has learned that the tea-party movement he helped foster won’t fall in line behind his efforts to push an alternative conservative agenda.
More Columns »