WHITE HOUSE

Obama Signs Policy Directive on Preparedness

Updated: April 5, 2011 | 9:00 p.m.
April 5, 2011 | 8:49 p.m.

President Obama signed a still-secret national security directive last week designed to put the administration's imprint on the way the nation responds to major emergencies. (SAUL LOEB/AFP/Getty Images)

President Obama signed a national-security directive last week designed to put the administration's imprint on the way the nation responds to major emergencies, including terrorism, National Journal has learned.

A senior administration official said that congressional committees were briefed on Tuesday night on the Presidential Policy Directive, which bears the title of “National Preparedness.” The official said the text would be made public later this week. It is not clear if any annexes will be classified. The directive sets government policy as informed by a National Security Staff review that was completed earlier this year.

According to a summary of the directive given to National Journal, the administration preserves core elements of the Bush administration’s emergency preparedness plan, which was released in 2003. It makes Homeland Security grants contingent on performance and on how the Homeland Security Secretary assesses need and the quality of response plans.

But the Obama directive places significant emphasis on an “all-of-nation” “all-hazards” approach to disasters, fusing together the capabilities of federal, state, and local authorities to respond to crises. It refocuses government resources on mitigation—preventing catastrophes from getting worse—and resilience—how communities actively respond to and recover from a major disaster.

An official said that the new policy guidelines were developed in the wake of several disasters, including the H1N1 flu pandemic and the Deepwater Horizon oil spill.

The directive also “instructs the Department of Homeland Security to set up a National Preparedness System," which the summary says “will enable the nation to achieve the goal” of maximum preparedness and to undertake “a comprehensive campaign to build and sustain national preparedness; and an annual National Preparedness Report to measure progress in meeting the goal.”

The directive also calls for closer collaboration with the private sector and for better and more effective ways for the government to communicate with communities during crises.

Presidential Policy Directives carry the force of executive orders, but they originate from the National Security Council and can be classified. President George W. Bush issued dozens of orders, many of them without any public notice. Last September, Obama signed a policy directive on global engagement, the first of its kind. It was his sixth. Only the text of his first, which spelled out the duties of the National Security Council, has been released, according to the Federation of American Scientists, which tracks the directives.



Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Related Content
Expert Opinions
Energy Experts

What's at Stake with Natural-Gas Exports?

54 minutes ago

Latest Response by Dave McCurdy: Natural Gas Market Will Find Balance

Transportation Experts

Do We Suddenly Hate Driving?

4:24 p.m.

Latest Response by Keith Laughlin: We Need a New Policy for a New Day

Energy Experts

What's at Stake with Natural-Gas Exports?

3:21 p.m.

Latest Response by Tim Peckinpaugh: LNG Exports: Let the Market Decide

More Expert Opinions »

Columns
Charlie Cook: Off to the Races

Republicans’ Hatred of Obama Blinds Them to Public Disinterest in Scandals

May 20, 2013
Republicans are so focused on their bitter battles against Obama, they can’t see how little impact the “scandals” have had on public opinion.
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

How the White House Scandals Could Hurt Republicans, Too

May 16, 2013
By enraging the base and strengthening the faction least willing to compromise with Obama, the IRS and Benghazi affairs could hurt a GOP shot at the presidency.
More Columns »