ANALYSIS

Obama's Asia Trip Shows Hope's Limits

A rough journey, but could President McCain have done better?

Updated: November 12, 2010 | 9:34 a.m.
November 12, 2010 | 8:58 a.m.

President Obama speaks at a news conference today at the G-20 Summit in Seoul, South Korea. (Chung Sung-Jun/Getty Images)

It’s hard to remember, but there was a time when it was assumed, naïvely and perhaps unfairly, that Barack Obama’s mere presence would charm the world.

After all, the U.S. war in Iraq and the cocksure style of George W. Bush were said to have so alienated friend and foe alike that an Obama presidency couldn’t help but be a balm on old wounds. First, he wasn’t Bush, and second, his multiracial background, youth abroad, and willingness to engage adversaries such as Iran without precondition seemed certain to enhance American stature in the world.

Were it so simple.

Obama’s Asia trip provides plenty of evidence that that hope was naïve. He didn’t get the coveted free trade agreement with South Korea and he didn’t get the rest of the Group of 20 powers to stand behind his criticism of China’s currency policies, which the U.S. believes have added to trade imbalances. What’s more, he got criticized for the money-pumping actions of the Federal Reserve. Obama himself noted that not every trip can be a home run. Singles count, too. And indeed the G-20 did agree to take up the questions of trade and savings imbalances later and more earnestly. Instead of a solid single, it looks more like a shallow hit that barely got him to first base.

The good news for Obama is that one trip doth not a presidency make. John Kennedy was seen as being outflanked by Nikita Khrushchev at their first summit meeting in Vienna in 1961. No one in the first or second year of the Reagan administration could have anticipated the sweeping arms control agreements that would mark the end of his second term. Things can go north as well as south.

But Obama is working with a set of conditions that surely would have hobbled a President McCain. We’re a debtor nation, and as anyone who’s ever taken out a loan knows, it’s hard to yell at your banker. It’s Bush’s Fed Chairman, Ben Bernanke, who has taken these aggressive measures, and not without cause. Obama may have made mistakes—waiting too long, perhaps, to close the South Korea deal. No president, though, can bend the world to his will—even one in whom so much hope was placed.

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Expert Opinions
Energy Experts

What's at Stake with Natural-Gas Exports?

8:23 p.m.

Latest Response by William O'Keefe: LNG: A Rising Tide Does Raise All Boats

Transportation Experts

Do We Suddenly Hate Driving?

6:39 p.m.

Latest Response by Laura Barrett: P3s Must Be Accountable to Public

Energy Experts

What's at Stake with Natural-Gas Exports?

5:16 p.m.

Latest Response by Marlo Lewis: Central Planning: Bad Export Policy

More Expert Opinions »

Columns
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

How the White House Scandals Could Hurt Republicans, Too

May 16, 2013
By enraging the base and strengthening the faction least willing to compromise with Obama, the IRS and Benghazi affairs could hurt a GOP shot at the presidency.
Norm Ornstein: Washington Inside Out

Eric Cantor’s Caucus Thwarts His Push for an Alternative Agenda

May 16, 2013
Cantor has learned that the tea-party movement he helped foster won’t fall in line behind his efforts to push an alternative conservative agenda.
More Columns »