WHITE HOUSE

Obama: Libya Response ‘Not Optimal’

New report suggests CIA aware of militant link within 24 hours of attack

Updated: October 19, 2012 | 9:49 a.m.
October 19, 2012 | 9:37 a.m.

In an appearance on The Daily Show with Jon Stewart on Thursday night, President Obama said the administration’s response to the attacks in Libya were not up to par, according to CBS News.

In the interview Stewart said, “I would say, and even you would admit, it was not the optimal response - at least to the American people as far as all of us being on the same page."

Responded Obama: "Here is what I will say, if four Americans get killed it is not optimal.

"And we are going to fix it, all of it," he continued. "And what happens during the course of a presidency, you know the government is a big operation at any given time, something screws up and you make sure you find out what's broken and you fix it."

The comments drew attacks from Republicans “It’s just so inappropriate," said Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., according to Politico. "And I’m sure that the families of those brave Americans are not amused.”

Meanwhile, the Associated Press reported on Friday that within 24 hours of the attack, the CIA station chief in Libya reported to Washington evidence that the assault was carried out by militants and was not the result of a spontaneous demonstration. The administration maintained for a week that the attack was a result of protests.

On Thursday, The Wall Street Journal reported that fresh intelligence casting doubt on the “spontaneous” explanation proffered by U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Susan Rice came in the night before she made her appearances on the Sunday shows, but Rice was not apprised of the changes. Instead, she relied on talking points provided by the CIA, according to The Journal.

Meanwhile, The New York Times published an interview with a suspect in the attack, Ahmed Abu Khattala, who is reportedly living in plain sight in Benghazi without fear of reprisal.

 

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Related Content
Expert Opinions
Energy Experts

What's at Stake with Natural-Gas Exports?

3:21 p.m.

Latest Response by Tim Peckinpaugh: LNG Exports: Let the Market Decide

Education Experts

New Definition of Asperger's, Autism for Kids

3:20 p.m.

Latest Response by Gina Burkhardt: To Label or Not to Label?

Energy Experts

What's at Stake with Natural-Gas Exports?

7:33 a.m.

Latest Response by Michael Schmidt: Debate is Microcosm of Energy Policy

More Expert Opinions »
Columns
Charlie Cook: Off to the Races

Republicans’ Hatred of Obama Blinds Them to Public Disinterest in Scandals

May 20, 2013
Republicans are so focused on their bitter battles against Obama, they can’t see how little impact the “scandals” have had on public opinion.
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

How the White House Scandals Could Hurt Republicans, Too

May 16, 2013
By enraging the base and strengthening the faction least willing to compromise with Obama, the IRS and Benghazi affairs could hurt a GOP shot at the presidency.
More Columns »