WHITE HOUSE

Obama Highlights Efforts to Prevent Genocide

Updated: April 23, 2012 | 11:52 a.m.
April 23, 2012 | 10:54 a.m.

President Obama, defending his administration's efforts to prevent genocide, said the Atrocities Prevention Board would begin meeting on Monday. “This is not an afterthought. This is not a sideline in our foreign policy,” he said at the Holocaust Memorial Museum.

Facing critics who say the administration is not doing enough to halt the widespread killing in Syria, Obama ordered the board created in August 2011 in part to avoid the international criticism faced by former Presidents Bill Clinton on Rwanda, and George W. Bush on Darfur.

“Preventing mass atrocities and genocide is a core national security interest and a core moral responsibility of the United States of America,” Obama said. “It does not mean that we intervene militarily every time there's an injustice in the world. We cannot and should not. It does mean we possess many tools diplomatic and political and economic and financial and intelligence and law enforcement and our moral suasion.”

“Going forward, we’ll strengthen our tools across the board. And we’ll make new ones,” he said.

The president also said that during his tenure, “I know we have saved countless lives.” Obama pointed to the diplomatic efforts to aid the secession of South Sudan, the NATO intervention in Libya, and the American advisers sent to Uganda and other regional forces to help pursue the leader of the Lord’s Resistance Army, Joseph Kony.

After a National Security Council review of the Africa mission's progress, Obama said he would continue to deploy the about 100 U.S. military personnel there. "This is part of our regional strategy to end the scourge that is the LRA,” he said.

--Sara Sorcher contributed

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Related Content
Expert Opinions
Energy Experts

What's at Stake with Natural-Gas Exports?

7:32 a.m.

Latest Response by Margo Thorning: Capitalize on Robust U.S. Natural Gas Sources

Energy Experts

What's at Stake with Natural-Gas Exports?

7:29 a.m.

Latest Response by Marty: Pick Up the Pace on Export Approvals

Energy Experts

What's at Stake with Natural-Gas Exports?

7:26 a.m.

Latest Response by Jonathan Silver: Nat Gas: Exports are Not the Only Issue

More Expert Opinions »

Columns
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

How the White House Scandals Could Hurt Republicans, Too

May 16, 2013
By enraging the base and strengthening the faction least willing to compromise with Obama, the IRS and Benghazi affairs could hurt a GOP shot at the presidency.
Norm Ornstein: Washington Inside Out

Eric Cantor’s Caucus Thwarts His Push for an Alternative Agenda

May 16, 2013
Cantor has learned that the tea-party movement he helped foster won’t fall in line behind his efforts to push an alternative conservative agenda.
More Columns »